Google Pixel Watch review: a good first attempt

Small smartwatch gets much right but comes up short versus cheaper rivals and cannot be repaired

Google’s first Pixel smartwatch is finally here after years of waiting, integrating the company’s Fitbit health-tracking tech and hoping to take on Samsung and the dominant Apple Watch.

The Pixel Watch costs £339 ($350/A$549) and, while designed as a companion for the company’s smartphones, it will work with most Android phones with access to the Google Play Store but not with Apple’s iPhone. It runs Google’s Wear OS software based on Android but is heavily integrated with Fitbit – the fitness tracker firm Google bought in 2019 – potentially making it the best of both worlds.

Unusually for a smartwatch, the Pixel Watch only comes in one small size with a 41mm case. Its domed Gorilla Glass 5 screen merges smoothly into its stainless steel body, which is available in a choice of three colours. It is a simple and unfussy design.

The Google Pixel Watch shot from the back showing the crown and side button.
One side of the watch has a button and a crown, and the other a mic and speaker for taking calls on your wrist or talking to Google Assistant. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

The 20mm bands detach with a small button each side but the slightly fiddly proprietary attachment mechanism means standard watch straps won’t fit. Each Pixel Watch comes with a high-quality rubber band, with other types available from £59.

The watch certainly looks and feels well made, and is comfortable to wear. Despite being quite thick, its smooth finish slides under shirt cuffs without issue.

For those with smaller wrists, the compact size will be a boon, but it was a bit too small for me. The screen is bright and crisp and can be turned on all the time, which I think is an essential feature for a watch. But it is smaller than you might expect, with large bezels around the outside. The predominantly black interface hides well but text, images and information look pretty small on the 3cm display.

The Pixel Watch showing the face on a male wrist.
The 41mm case and 3cm screen makes the watch on the small side compared with rivals that offer more than one size. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

The watch is responsive. Taps, swipes and crown turns are smoothly executed. Apps open swiftly, and Google Assistant loads and responds quickly to queries. It’s not quite as snappy as an Apple Watch but it is miles faster than most rivals on the Android side, matching Samsung’s Galaxy Watch line.

The battery only just lasts long enough on a day-to-day basis. With the screen always on, the health-monitoring features active and the “bedtime mode” with sleep tracking overnight, the watch lasted about 25 hours between charges.

But if you track any exercise during the day, the watch won’t last the night, meaning you will have to charge it for at least 15 minutes before bed to track your sleep. A full charge takes just shy of 80 minutes from dead using the USB-C charging puck and your own power adaptor.

A selection of four watch faces displayed on the Google Pixel Watch.
There are plenty of good watch faces included, most with customisations for colour, design and complications, with loads of third-party options available in the Play Store. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian


  • Screen: 3cm AMOLED (320ppi)

  • Case size: 41mm

  • Case thickness: 12.3mm

  • Band size: 20mm proprietary

  • Weight: 36g

  • Processor: Samsung Exynos 9110 + M33 co-processor

  • RAM: 2GB

  • Storage: 32GB

  • Operating system: Wear OS 3.5 (Android 11)

  • Water resistance: 50 metres (5ATM)

  • Sensors: barometer, gyro, HR, ECG, mic, speaker, NFC, GNSS, compass

  • Connectivity: Bluetooth 5, wifi n, NFC, optional 4G/eSIM


Google does not provide an expected lifespan for the battery but it should last in excess of 500 full charge cycles with at least 80% of its original capacity. It cannot be replaced and the watch is currently unrepairable.

It contains 80% recycled stainless steel. The company publishes environmental impact reports for some of its products including the Pixel Watch. Google will recycle old devices free of charge.

Wear OS 3.5 for plenty of apps

A composite image showing Spotify and Google Assistant running on a Pixel Watch.
The latest version of Wear OS can run third-party apps such as Spotify and has built-in Google Assistant for voice queries. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

The watch runs the latest version of Wear OS 3.5, with Google’s customisations making it look a little different from Samsung’s version of it. Google will support the watch until at least October 2025. It will run third-party apps downloaded from the Play Store including Strava and Spotify with offline music downloads.

Google Assistant is baked in for quick voice assistance, which works significantly faster than older-generation Wear OS watches and Fitbits. Press and hold the side button to bring it up or just say “Hey Google”. Google Maps, Gmail, Calendar and Wallet apps are available, too, alongside Home for controlling smart lights and other bits.

It displays full notifications from your phone, including images in alerts and chats, with the ability to respond to them. Typing replies on the watch is hard as the keyboard is tiny but voice dictation works pretty well.


The Fitbit app tracking a workout on a Pixel Watch.
The watch can show four basic metrics during activity, which are small, but the screen is bright enough to see outdoors in direct sunlight. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Google’s Fitbit takes care of health and fitness-tracking features, both on the watch and a companion app on the phone. The experience is very similar to what you get on Fitbit’s Versa and Sense fitness trackers, providing solid general health tracking including steps, calories, sedentary alerts, all-day heart rate and ECGs, but no irregular heartbeat notifications, temperature sensor or fall detection yet.

Sleep tracking is good, with cycles, breathing rate and heart-rate variability all recorded.

Exercise tracking is a bit more of a mixed bag. The Fitbit app nails the basics with pretty fast GPS and heart-rate monitoring, which beat actual Fitbit devices for accuracy.

But while the watch tracks 41 different workouts with heart-rate zones and different goals, the data it captures and displays during the activity is fairly basic. For running, you have no cadence or route guidance. You can’t set up interval workouts. Cycling lacks power and other bits. All workout controls are touch-screen based for pausing or setting laps, which makes doing so much harder than it needs to be.

The Android Fitbit app showing general health and activity data taken from a Pixel Watch.
The watch syncs with the Fitbit app on your phone, showing decent summaries of your workouts and combining them with your general health data. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Fitbit also offers a “premium” subscription, which costs from £7.99 a month and unlocks some extras in the app. For sleep it will show you restlessness and sleeping heart rate, more mindfulness sessions, a breakdown of your stress through the day and a daily “readiness” score, which shows recovery from exercise. You get a free six-month trial with the watch.

The built-in exercise options will be fine for casual users but are certainly more limited than competitors including Apple and Samsung. They can be augmented with third-party Wear OS apps, such as Strava or Komoot for route guidance.


The Google Pixel Watch costs £339 ($350/A$549) or £379 ($400/$649) with 4G (data contract required).

For comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 costs £269, the Fitbit Sense 2 costs £270, the Apple Watch Series 8 costs £419 and the Garmin Venu 2 costs £230.


The Pixel Watch is a good first try for Google but it isn’t yet up to par with rival smartwatches, including Samsung’s Galaxy Watch line, which use the same software.

It is a small, well-made watch that is responsive and merges the best of Fitbit with Google’s Wear OS. You can run third-party apps and use all of Google’s various services, from Gmail and Calendar to contactless payments.

However, the battery life is a bit too short – only just enough for 24 hours without exercise. Fitbit isn’t as capable as rivals when it comes to workout tracking yet. It is relatively expensive and might be a bit small and plain for some, too.

But a bigger issue is that the watch is currently unrepairable, so if the battery wears out or you break the screen, you’re out of luck. Google said it was looking at repair options but for now that loses it a star.

Pros: responsive, smooth design, 50m water resistance, Fitbit, Play Store, all Google apps including Maps, Pay and Assistant, good integration with Google ecosystem, good watch faces, works with most Android phones.

Cons: short battery life, Fitbit limited for workout tracking, not repairable, expensive, small size only, strap release a bit fiddly, not compatible with an iPhone.

The Pixel Watch on its magnetic charging puck.
The Pixel Watch hits 30% charge in about 15 minutes but unlike Samsung’s watches that can charge from the back of a phone, it will only charge via the included USB-C magnetic puck that clips to the back. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian


Samuel Gibbs Consumer technology editor

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Google IO: Pixel 6a, Pixel Watch and Android 13 unveiled
New Pro earbuds and upcoming Pixel 7 phones, tablet and software shown off during virtual event

Samuel Gibbs

11, May, 2022 @7:00 PM

Article image
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 review: the new Google smartwatch
Wear OS 3 watch ups ante for Android wearables, now faster and feature-packed with body-fat scanner

Samuel Gibbs Consumer technology editor

06, Sep, 2021 @6:00 AM

Article image
Google Pixel 7 review: cracking camera at a good price
Smaller Android phone offers great software, smart AI and performance for much less than rivals

Samuel Gibbs Consumer technology editor

31, Oct, 2022 @7:00 AM

Article image
Google Pixel 4 review: a good phone ruined by poor battery life
Brilliant camera, slick features and small size mean nothing when the phone won’t even last a day

Samuel Gibbs Consumer technology editor

31, Oct, 2019 @7:00 AM

Article image
Google Pixel 7 Pro review: new camera champ undercuts competition
Top-class camera and zoom, good performance and smart AI tricks costing significantly less than rivals

Samuel Gibbs Consumer technology editor

13, Oct, 2022 @6:00 AM

Article image
Pixel 6 review: the cut-price Google flagship phone
Top camera, Android 12 and Tensor chip but competitive pricing makes for a bargain

Samuel Gibbs Consumer technology editor

02, Nov, 2021 @7:00 AM

Article image
Google Pixel 6a review: this mid-range master is a true bargain
Top chip, brilliant camera, great software and solid battery life in a smaller body with a cheaper price

Samuel Gibbs Consumer technology editor

22, Jul, 2022 @6:00 AM

Article image
Google launches cheaper Pixel 4 to undercut Apple's iPhone
Smartphone comes with radar tech and is joined by revamped Nest Mini, Pixelbook Go and other devices

Samuel Gibbs Consumer technology editor

15, Oct, 2019 @3:36 PM

Article image
Google Pixel 2 XL review: the best big-screened Android experience yet
The fastest and smoothest Google Android device has a cracking camera, squeezable sides, great battery life and baked-in AI

Samuel Gibbs

17, Oct, 2017 @1:00 PM

Article image
Pixel Buds review: Google's competent AirPods alternative
Good sound, battery life, case and design, with instant translation and different silicone tip with open-air-like fit

Samuel Gibbs Consumer technology editor

20, Jul, 2020 @6:00 AM