Banks stand to lose at least $500m if they fund Elon Musk’s Twitter takeover

Morgan Stanley and six others committed in April to raise $13bn in debt to finance the purchase – before a deterioration in credit markets

Several large US and international banks would lose $500m or more if they proceed with obligations to fund Elon Musk’s $44bn takeover of Twitter, according to a report on Saturday.

The banks, led by Morgan Stanley and six others, including Barclays and Bank of America, committed six months ago to raise $13bn in debt to finance Musk’s purchase – an agreement that does not hinge on whether they are able to sell the debt on to investors.

According to Bloomberg calculations published on Saturday, the banks’ losses would collectively amount “to $500m or more if the debt were to be sold now”.

Higher interest rates tied to efforts to bring down record inflation have led to a deterioration in the credit markets, with returns on risky junk bonds and leveraged loans surging. When the Musk-Twitter deal was financed in April, banks agreed to terms with lower yields than the market would now accept, leading to potential write-downs.

About $400m of the $500m in losses that the banks are estimated to have on the Twitter debt are in unsecured, high interest bonds, and they exclude fees the banks would typically earn on the transaction.

“I think that those banks would like to get out of it, I think the deal makes less sense for them now, and that the debt will be harder to syndicate to investors,” Howard Fischer, a Moses Singler law firm partner, told the outlet.

In a surprise turnaround last week, Musk abandoned his three-month effort to terminate the Twitter deal through a US court in Delaware, citing the large number of fake accounts on Twitter. By some estimates, 20% of Twitter users are fake.

The billionaire boss of Tesla and SpaceX also cancelled negotiations to shave $10bn off the agreed $44bn price tag (Twitter shares have traded as much as $20 below the $54 a share agreed in April) and said he would accept the original terms of the deal.

Musk told the Financial Times on Saturday that his interest in the company has never been primarily financial.

“I’m not doing Twitter for the money. It’s not like I’m trying to buy some yacht and I can’t afford it. I don’t own any boats. But I think it’s important that people have a maximally trusted and inclusive means of exchanging ideas and that it should be as trusted and transparent as possible.”

Twitter, however, did not immediately drop the lawsuit it is pursuing in order to force Musk into compliance.

“There is no need for an expedited trial to order defendants to do what they are already doing,” Musk’s attorneys wrote in a filing. “Yet, Twitter will not take yes for an answer. Astonishingly they have insisted on proceeding with this litigation, recklessly putting the deal at risk and gambling with their stockholders interests.”

Twitter said the attempt to halt the litigation was “an invitation to further mischief and delay”.

On Thursday, the judge presiding over the case, Kathaleen McCormick, granted Musk’s request to delay a trial scheduled for 17 October. Musk’s attorney said they could get the deal could done by 28 October “pending receipt of the proceeds of the debt financing”.

But some warn that there are few ways for the banks to get out of providing financing, for both legal and reputational reasons, even if that means booking substantial losses. “Generally it would be hard to have deals go forward if they were contingent on bank financing and that bank financing was not rock solid,” Fischer told the outlet.

But if the deal does not close later this month, McCormick has said that she would schedule a trial for November.


Edward Helmore

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Five things in Elon Musk’s in-tray after Twitter takeover
From Donald Trump’s suspended account to revenue growth, here is what the Tesla CEO is likely to tackle

Dan Milmo Global technology editor

25, Apr, 2022 @7:02 PM

Article image
What are Elon Musk’s options in the Twitter takeover deal?
The Tesla chief says the deal cannot go ahead unless the platform proves that fewer than 5% of users are bots

Dan Milmo Global technology editor

17, May, 2022 @7:23 PM

Article image
Twitter suspends account monitoring Elon Musk’s flight paths
Musk had vowed to allow @ElonJet to post but then declared accounts that listed real-time location data would be suspended

Maya Yang

15, Dec, 2022 @2:04 AM

Article image
Concern over Elon Musk’s Twitter takeover wipes $126bn off Tesla value
Fears that carmaker’s CEO may have to sell shares to fund $44bn acquisition of social network

Guardian staff and agency

27, Apr, 2022 @7:02 AM

Article image
Jeff Bezos questions China’s influence over Elon Musk’s Twitter
Amazon founder raises concerns after Tesla boss strikes $44bn deal to buy social media platform

Dan Milmo Global technology editor

26, Apr, 2022 @6:33 AM

Article image
Could Elon Musk’s Twitter plans prove a costly mistake?
Analysis: Experts warn against reinstating banned accounts and neglecting moderation

Dan Milmo Global technology editor

26, Apr, 2022 @4:13 PM

Article image
Elon Musk’s Twitter is going to be a disaster | Hamilton Nolan
Musk probably bought Twitter for the same reason billionaires throughout history have become press barons: to try to control the conversation

Hamilton Nolan

28, Oct, 2022 @8:00 PM

Article image
Elon Musk’s takeover marks a good time to turn off Twitter | Letters
Letters: Letting your fingers run ahead of your brain on any digital platform should be avoided, writes Geoff Reid. Plus letters from Alastair Penny and Martin Coult


29, Apr, 2022 @3:27 PM

Article image
Mastodon founder says investors lining up since Elon Musk’s Twitter takeover
Eugen Rochko has ‘offers of hundreds of thousands of dollars’ from Silicon Valley private equity firms

Dan Milmo Global technology editor

28, Dec, 2022 @4:47 PM

Article image
The Twitter shareholders set to make millions from Elon Musk’s takeover
Analysis: From founder Jack Dorsey to dotcom pioneer Martha Lane Fox … the big players in line for big payouts

Graeme Wearden

26, Apr, 2022 @5:49 PM