AI and maths to play bigger role in global diplomacy, says expert

Professor of negotiation and conflict management says recent advances mean techniques will be used more

International diplomacy has traditionally relied on bargaining power, covert channels of communication and personal chemistry between leaders. But a new era is upon us in which the dispassionate insights of AI algorithms and mathematical techniques such as game theory will play a growing role in deals struck between nations, according to the co-founder of the world’s first centre for science in diplomacy.

Michael Ambühl, a professor of negotiation and conflict management and former chief Swiss-EU negotiator, said recent advances in AI and machine learning mean that these technologies now have a meaningful part to play in international diplomacy, including at the Cop26 summit starting later this month and in post-Brexit deals on trade and immigration.

“These technologies are partially already used and it will be the intention to use them more,” said Ambühl. “Everything around data science, artificial intelligence, machine learning … we want to see how can it be made beneficial for multilateral or bilateral diplomacy.”

The use of AI in international negotiations is at an early stage, he said, citing the use of machine learning to assess the integrity of data and detect fake news to ensure the diplomatic process has reliable foundations. In the future, these technologies could be used to identify patterns in economic data underpinning free trade deals and help standardise some aspects of negotiations.

The Lab for Science in Diplomacy, a collaboration between ETH Zürich where Ambühl is based and the University of Geneva, will also focus on “negotiation engineering”, where existing mathematical techniques such as game theory are used either to help frame a discussion, or to play out different scenarios before engaging in talks.

These tools are not new. Game theory was developed in the 1920s by the Hungarian-American mathematician John Von Neumann, initially to formalise the concept of “bluffing” in poker and later used to weigh up nuclear strike scenarios during the cold war. However, until recently such techniques fell out of mainstream use, “not due to a lack of technology but rather a lack of knowledge”, according to Ambühl. “Diplomats are not that accustomed to it.”

But as the world becomes more tech and data-savvy, those who ignore quantitative methods risk selling themselves short. Ambühl said that, as Switzerland’s chief EU negotiator, he ran a game theory simulation ahead of talks that led to Switzerland joining the Shengen area and a raft of agreements with the EU on tax, trade and security. The analysis indicated that it was in Switzerland’s interest for the negotiations to take place as a package rather than sequentially, and so the Swiss government insisted on this as a basis for talks.

Did the EU do their own analysis? “I don’t think so,” said Ambühl. “We didn’t tell them that we did game theory.”

Taking a mathematical approach can also help “de-emotionalise” underlying conflicts, according to Ambühl. He cites talks between Iran and the P5+1 countries in Geneva in 2005, where as facilitator he came up with a mathematical formula for the rate at which Iran would reduce its number of nuclear centrifuges. “When we presented the idea it was, ‘Now let’s talk about the size of this gradient, alpha, which is between 0 and 1’,” he said. “You discuss it on a more technical level.”

Can deep-rooted political issues really be distilled down into a gradient on a curve? Ambühl said that this misses the point, which is to crystallise what is under negotiation not to offer a fully formed solution. “It’s not about making a technical agreement,” he said. “It’s a political question, but you break it down. You divide it into problems and sub-problems and sub-sub-problems.”

A more scientific approach does not mean ditching traditional methods. “I’m not pretending you can only negotiate well if you do it this way,” he said. “It still depends very much on other factors like how much bargaining power you have, whether you have a charming negotiator, whether you have a PM behind who supports tough negotiations and how well have you prepared.”

Are there risks that any of these new approaches could backfire, with rival AIs escalating conflicts or arriving at diplomatic solutions that are mathematically optimal, but have disastrous real-world consequences?

“You’re not going to war only because a blind algorithm decides it – it goes without saying that this would be idiotic,” said Ambühl. “It’s always only a decision tool.”

“You cannot just blindly rely on it, but you also cannot blindly rely on the gut feeling of these politicians,” he added. “You have to make a clever combination of new technologies and the political analysis.”


Contributor

Hannah Devlin Science correspondent

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Alan Turing: the short, brilliant life and tragic death of an enigma

Codebreaker and mathematician Alan Turing's legacy comes to life in a Science Museum exhibition

Maev Kennedy

20, Jun, 2012 @4:48 PM

Article image
Maths and tech specialists need Hippocratic oath, says academic
Exclusive: Hannah Fry says ethical pledge needed in tech fields that will shape future

Ian Sample Science editor

16, Aug, 2019 @4:00 PM

Article image
Synthetic brain will be built within a decade
The silicon brain would provide insights into how our perceptions of the world are interpreted and stored, and how consciousness arises

Ian Sample, science correspondent

23, Jul, 2009 @2:16 PM

Article image
Falling total fertility rate should be welcomed, population expert says
Figures showing declining birth rates are ‘cause for celebration’, not alarm

Nicola Davis

26, Dec, 2018 @7:00 AM

Article image
The new robot revolution will take the boss's job, not the gardener's
Advances in artificial intelligence mean a second wave of change is approaching – and it is not the low-paid service sector where jobs are most at risk

Larry Elliott

22, Jan, 2017 @1:38 PM

Article image
Brexit talks may be most complicated negotiation ever, says Davis
David Davis expects ‘more open process’ after article 50 has been triggered, but warns parliament some aspects of talks must remain secret

Rowena Mason Deputy political editor

12, Sep, 2016 @5:33 PM

Article image
Brexit deal 'a week away' but May must agree on customs union, says Barnier
Deal could be done by next Wednesday but PM must abandon red line, says EU negotiator

Daniel Boffey and Jennifer Rankin

10, Oct, 2018 @5:05 PM

Article image
Campaign to stop 'killer robots' takes peace mascot to UN
Robot Wars survivor David Wreckham has found new purpose as the face of the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots

Henry McDonald

21, Oct, 2019 @5:00 AM

Article image
UK supercomputer Cambridge-1 to hunt for medical breakthroughs
Computer – the most powerful in Britain – will use AI to find new cures and deepen understanding of diseases

Natalie Grover Science correspondent

06, Jul, 2021 @11:01 PM

Article image
PM's apology to codebreaker Alan Turing: we were inhumane

Admission comes 55 years after Enigma genius chemically castrated for being gay took his life

Caroline Davies

11, Sep, 2009 @1:05 AM