Facebook decisions led to serious setbacks for civil rights – report

Two-year audit praises some decisions but criticises lack of action over Trump posts

Facebook’s decisions over the last nine months have resulted in “serious setbacks for civil rights,” according to the damning conclusion of a two-year-long audit commissioned by the social network to review its impact on the world.

The final report, which focuses primarily on decisions made since June 2019, praises Facebook’s move to ban American advertisers from using its tools for housing and employment discrimination, and the company’s belated decision to ban explicit support for white nationalism.

But, the auditors say, many of the changes were offset by Facebook’s decision, beginning with a speech from Mark Zuckerberg last September, to “elevate a selective view of free expression as Facebook’s most cherished value”.

“Elevating free expression is a good thing, but it should apply to everyone,” the report says. “The prioritisation of free expression over all other values, such as equality and non-discrimination, is deeply troubling to the auditors.” The pivot “deeply impacted our civil rights work and added new challenges to reining in voter suppression”.

Nowhere was the new focus more clearly felt than in Facebook’s lack of action against three Donald Trump posts in May 2020. “One post allowed the propagation of hate/violent speech and two facilitated voter suppression,” the auditors write. “These decisions exposed a major hole in Facebook’s understanding and application of civil rights … Our fear was (and continues to be) that these decisions establish terrible precedent for others to emulate.

“Specifically, we have grave concerns that the combination of the company’s decision to exempt politicians from fact-checking and the precedents set by its recent decisions on President Trump’s posts, leaves the door open for the platform to be used by other politicians to interfere with voting.

“Facebook has not, as of this writing, reversed the decisions about the Trump posts and the auditors are deeply troubled by that because of the precedent they establish for other speakers on the platform and the ways those decisions seem to gut policies the auditors and the civil rights community worked hard to get Facebook to adopt.”

The audit was welcomed by Facebook’s chief operating officer, Sheryl Sandberg. “As hard as it has been to have our shortcomings exposed by experts, it has undoubtedly been a really important process for our company,” Sandberg said. “We would urge companies in our industry and beyond to do the same.”

But while the company has committed to a number of changes proposed by the auditors, including hiring a civil rights leader, banning ads that are “divisive and include fearmongering statements”, and investing $100m (£80m) in black-owned small businesses, even before the audit was published Sandberg had warned that not every recommendation would be implemented. Facebook did not give specific examples of which recommendations were to be passed by.

Farhana Khera, the executive director of Muslim Advocates, a US-based nonprofit, said that the audit “lays bare the many ways Facebook has shamefully harmed Muslims and other vulnerable communities, but even more shameful is the company’s refusal to do anything meaningful to stop this pain and violence”.

The report’s publication, which was set two years ago, coincidentally comes amid one of Facebook’s most serious crises to date: an advertiser boycott coordinated by a coalition of civil rights groups, Stop Hate for Profit, urging the company to implement a set of policies aimed at curbing hate speech on the platform.

Despite telling advertisers and colleagues that the company would not bend to revenue pressure, Zuckerberg went on to announce a series of changes as a result of the boycott, including a promise to “reconsider” a number of existing platform rules about incitement of violence. The changes were described by the auditors as “positive movement in reaction to the uproar”, but did little to please the boycott organisers themselves.

“Facebook showed up to this meeting expecting a grade A for attendance,” said Rashad Robinson, of the Color of Change, one of the coalition members. “Attendance alone is not enough. At this point we were expecting some very clear answers to the recommendations we put on the table, and we did not get that. We did not get to the heart of these problems.”


Alex Hern

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
MPs criticise social media firms for failure to report criminal posts
Facebook, Google and Twitter condemned for not telling police about crimes on their platforms

Alex Hern

24, Apr, 2019 @2:40 PM

Article image
Stormfront: 'murder capital of internet' pulled offline after civil rights action
Web.com pulls support for one of the oldest and largest neo-nazi hate sites following campaign by Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law

Alex Hern

29, Aug, 2017 @10:01 AM

Article image
Facebook buys rights to show La Liga games in India
Company signs exclusive three-year agreement to screen all 380 Spanish top-flight football matches across south Asia

Sean Farrell and Samuel Gibbs

14, Aug, 2018 @11:03 AM

Article image
Donald Trump's move against Twitter factchecking could backfire
President’s planned weakening of social media law may not have effect he thinks it will

Alex Hern

28, May, 2020 @12:31 PM

Article image
Social media firms must face heavy fines over extremist content – MPs
An inquiry by the Commons home affairs committee condemns technology companies for failing to tackle hate speech

Owen Bowcott Legal affairs correspondent

01, May, 2017 @5:01 AM

Article image
Facebook enables 'fake news' by reliance on digital advertising – report
Paper co-written by former company exec recommends switching news feed back to chronological listing

Alex Hern

31, Jan, 2018 @12:17 PM

Article image
Libra: US Congress asks Facebook to pause development
Legislators say they need time to investigate cryptocurrency and its potential impact

Alex Hern

03, Jul, 2019 @10:30 AM

Article image
Facebook judges, journalists and politicians on free speech panel
New independent board, which includes ex-Guardian editor, will rule on freedom of expression issues

Alex Hern

06, May, 2020 @5:00 PM

Article image
Google and Facebook 'considering ban on micro-targeted political ads'
Reports say firms may act over concerns that practice risks damaging democratic norms

Alex Hern

07, Nov, 2019 @3:17 PM

Article image
Facebook let children run up huge bills, court papers show
Staff discussed what to do with high-spending children before deciding to refuse refunds

Alex Hern

25, Jan, 2019 @2:01 PM