V is for verbatim theatre

Theatre that incorporates the words of real people has never been more popular – and has proved itself infinitely flexible

Verbatim theatre, as Will Hammond and Dan Steward point out in their excellent book on the subject, is not a form but a technique: a way of incorporating the words of real people, as spoken in private interview or public record, into drama. What is astonishing is how ubiquitous it has become. Enquirer, an investigation into the crisis in the newspaper industry, is currently being staged by the National Theatre of Scotland. Alecky Blythe's Where Have I Been All My Life, which dramatises interviews with people from North Staffordshire, has just finished a run at the New Vic, Newcastle-under-Lyme. And I'd be astonished if, right now, someone (ex-Tricycle artistic director Nicholas Kent, perhaps?) is not dreaming of a way of turning the Leveson inquiry into theatre.

What might be surprising is how long this sort of thing has been around. As Hammond and Steward remind us, the quest for some form of documentary truth is an ongoing feature of 20th century theatre. The German director Erwin Piscator (1893-1966) pioneered the idea of the living newspaper. The 50s and 60s saw the emergence of the theatre of fact, typified by Eric Bentley's Are You Now or Have You Ever Been?, which dramatised testimony to the United States' House Un-American Activities Committee, which brutally attempted to root out communists from American society. Even the West End in 1958 staged Robert Ardrey's Shadow of Heroes, warmly applauded by Kenneth Tynan as "a sort of illustrated lecture on the Hungarian revolt."

Today verbatim, as both process and product, is not merely everywhere. It is has proved itself infinitely flexible. The veteran director Max Stafford-Clark long used researched interviews as a rehearsal method, even when working on fictional material such as Caryl Churchill's Serious Money. Alecky Blythe has pioneered a method by which not only the content but the actual inflections of real people's speech are reproduced on stage: in London Road, which focuses on the fallout to the Ipswich murders of 2006, she shows that melodic speech patterns can even be the source of a musical. And London's Tricycle Theatre has famously produced a series of "tribunal plays", starting with Half the Picture in 1994, which based on a public enquiry into the sale of arms to Iraq. Verbatim has even acquired sufficient status to be satirised in Dennis Kelly's Taking Care of Baby, a caustically funny send-up of the genre, which invented its own form of mockumentary.

But why are we so hooked on verbatim theatre? There are many reasons, but one in particular strikes me. At a time when there is enormous public scepticism not only about politics but about the media, the theatre can offer a source of (relatively) uncontaminated truth. In some cases, as in the tribunal plays, that may be raw information about what was actually said at a public enquiry. In other cases, as in the Tricycle's 2004 play about Guantanamo, Honour Bound to Defend Freedom, it may be vital personal testimony as to the circumstances of imprisonment. This is not to deny that those who compile, or direct, verbatim plays may have an agenda. But that is as nothing compared to the interpretative slant placed on the news by the majority of print outlets. And in a world drowning in opinion – of which, naturally, this article is one more example – verbatim theatre offers us the bracing stimulus of fact.

But I also believe verbatim drama, at its best, is aesthetically indistinguishable from high art. The actor and writer Robin Soans, who has frequently used verbatim techniques, has said that "verbatim plays are more like conventional plays than is generally acknowledged." The supreme example was The Colour of Justice, based by Guardian journalist Richard Norton-Taylor on the Macpherson inquiry into the Metropolitan police's handling of the Stephen Lawrence case. In the way it peeled off the successive layers of official evasion, lies and incompetence, it showed an Ibsenite formal rigour. It was not merely about an important subject; as David Hare wrote, "it seemed to expose other forms by the sheer seriousness and intensity with which it was able to bring the theatre's special scrutiny to bear."

You can, of course, have rushed or lazy verbatim theatre. But, if we now accept it as a genre, it is not only because it offers necessary information. It is also because it can move and stir us as profoundly as any fiction.

• Read on: Verbatim, Verbatim: Contemporary Documentary Theatre by Will Hammond and Dan Steward (Oberon)

Obedience, Struggle and Revolt by David Hare (Faber and Faber)

Contributor

Michael Billington

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
U is for university theatre
Michael Billington: British drama's secret weapon is university-trained talent – from the venerable theatre societies of Oxbridge to world-beating modern drama departments

Michael Billington

01, May, 2012 @11:32 AM

Article image
R is for regional theatre
Some say that England’s rep theatres need a revolution if they’re to have a future. Perhaps instead they could learn from the past

Michael Billington

10, Apr, 2012 @12:47 PM

Article image
D is for director's theatre
Actors and aspiring auteurs should call a truce – theatre works best when they work together

Michael Billington

03, Jan, 2012 @12:54 PM

Article image
Q is for queer theatre

Michael Billington: The gay and lesbian theatre movement has changed radically since the oppressive days of the 1950s, but could more writers rise to the challenge of contemporary issues?

Michael Billington

03, Apr, 2012 @2:09 PM

Article image
B is for Brecht | Michael Billington's A to Z of modern drama
The German great was only secondly a Marxist. First and foremost he was a playwright of exceptional power and scope

Michael Billington

21, Dec, 2011 @5:32 PM

Article image
L is for lousy plays
Michael Billington: The age of the genuine theatrical stinker is over. But there are still plenty of terrible things to watch out for ...

Michael Billington

28, Feb, 2012 @5:58 PM

Article image
I is for illusion

Michael Billington: Suspension of belief can be a powerful theatrical tool, but should we be more emotionally detached from what's happening in front of us?

Michael Billington

08, Feb, 2012 @10:36 AM

Article image
P is for political theatre
Michael Billington: It may not be able to topple governments, but it informs, illuminates, entertains and raises awareness – and it's impossible to imagine life without it

Michael Billington

27, Mar, 2012 @11:43 AM

Article image
J is for Jewish dramatists
Michael Billington: Just as Jewish folk culture influenced Hollywood cinema, modern theatre has also been shaped by Yiddish tradition

Michael Billington

14, Feb, 2012 @2:11 PM

Article image
T is for Kenneth Tynan

Kenneth Tynan's criticism and personality tower over British theatre in the 50s and 60s. Today, his impact is no less felt, writes Michael Billington

Michael Billington

25, Apr, 2012 @9:02 AM