Despite the fury, Cameron Green’s catch leaves no grounds for complaint | Geoff Lemon

Indian fans believed Shubman Gill was wrongly dismissed but the laws are clear – although that won’t stop the arguments

As the second session wound onwards on the fourth day of the World Test Championship final, the Oval was a cheerful place. On a perfect, warm afternoon, the bays that were largely full of India supporters erupted after every boundary as Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill made a bright start to a massive run chase.

Soon it was much less bucolic, with a fair share of those fans shouting “Cheat!” at the Australian all-rounder Cameron Green. Others lined up to give him a gob-full as he climbed the stairs through the crowd at tea. Fielding in the gully, Green’s crime had been to throw out his hand for a low catch off Gill that the TV umpire, Richard Kettleborough, ruled fair.

We may as well get into the detail of Law 33, because the months to come will bring more low catches and the same feverish round of disagreements. They will centre on whether a ball touched the ground before a catch was taken and so whether a dismissal should stand. Let’s put an argument on the record.

First, it is significant the old “soft signal” is gone. That meant a standing umpire unsure about a catch could indicate whether they thought it was likely to be out or not, before asking the TV umpire for evidence to overturn that call. These days we go straight to the TV umpire, who is fully responsible for the ruling.

Low catches cause such discord because there is a gap between the way the laws are written and the way cricket is played and umpired. The text says that a batter is out if a ball is held as a fair catch “before it touches the ground”.

A fair catch starts “when the ball first comes into contact with a fielder’s person and shall end when a fielder obtains complete control over both the ball and his/her own movement”.

India’s Shubman Gill looks disgruntled on his walk back to the pavilion.
India’s Shubman Gill looks disgruntled on his walk back to the pavilion. Photograph: Glyn Kirk/AFP/Getty Images

Control is interpreted as the point when the movement that took the catcher to the ball has finished. Someone diving, sprawling or rolling has to become still, or stand, or resume walking or running normally. So it’s fair enough on reading the law to think that if any part of the ball brushes the ground during that process, the catch is void.

The problem is that cricket has never been umpired that way. On the field, these decisions are determined by whether the ground has contributed to the catcher gaining hold of the ball.

Say you lunge forward for a catch. Put your hand sideways, like holding a drink can. Imagine a cricket ball instead. You could be gripping it rigidly, but the circle of your little finger and thumb leave space for the ball to stick out. If that part of the ball touches ground while you slide forward, the ground hasn’t helped you take the catch. Any umpire would give that out.

Or picture the ball with your palm up. When you curl your fingers, there will be gaps between them, because that’s how spheres work. If you press that hand hard against the ground, the ball will make some contact. But it is still completely in your grasp.

Most contentious low catches, including Green’s, are like the latter. Fingers splay, allowing contact. But the ground has not helped gain control of the ball. The ball would be held even if the ground wasn’t there. A catch is not out when ground contact has come first, the ground helping deflect the ball into the hand, or if control of the ball was slipping and the ground helped regain it.

This year’s Sydney Test had three contentious examples. South Africa’s Simon Harmer had his fingers on the ground at slip when a ball bounced off them into his palms. Steve Smith took two low snares where some part of the ball touched ground despite his grasp. Kettleborough was the TV umpire in that match and gave all three not out.

It spawned broad confusion that such an experienced umpire was now following the letter of the law rather than the interpretation of precedent. Mark Waugh knows more about slip fielding than most people and said that all three catches would have stood at any other time. There is a strong case that Law 33 needs to be clarified, but not that its enforcement should change.

Maybe Kettleborough got a corrective, or self-issued one, or perhaps Green’s catch in this match offered fewer angles of doubt. Either way, it shows the ball going into his hand inches above the ground, then the hand descending.

Even the photograph zoom presented by those who disagree shows three fingers and a thumb firmly locked around the ball.

The ball is in his grasp and incidental ground contact does not influence that at all. It is the way the law was interpreted at suburban ovals around the world last weekend, it will be next weekend, and it should be no matter who is batting in any Test match from here. How was that? Out. Who’s in next?


Geoff Lemon at the Kia Oval

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Cummins’ lack of intent shows sharp contrast of styles before Ashes | Andy Bull
Idling tempo while batting in World Test Championship against India felt unfamiliar compared with Stokes’ all-action approach

Andy Bull at the Kia Oval

10, Jun, 2023 @6:30 PM

Article image
Virat Kohli gives India a glimmer of hope after Australia set daunting target
Virat Kohli and Ajinkya Rahane steadied the ship for India after they were set a daunting target of 444 by Australia

Simon Burnton at the Kia Oval

10, Jun, 2023 @6:26 PM

Article image
Late bloomer Scott Boland primed to deliver Ashes impact for Australia
Scott Boland was largely unknown arriving on the international stage at the age of 32 for Australia but the late bloomer’s weapons can make Ashes impact

Geoff Lemon at the Kia Oval

11, Jun, 2023 @4:59 PM

Article image
Australia’s Head-start changes emphasis and puts India to the sword | Geoff Lemon
When Travis Head arrived at the Oval crease, his side were in a precarious position – now they will enter day two well in charge

Geoff Lemon at the Kia Oval

07, Jun, 2023 @6:36 PM

Article image
Beware, England: Steve Smith looks like a batting immortal again | Geoff Lemon
The Australian’s dominant century in the World Test Championship final against India strikes an ominous note before the Ashes

Geoff Lemon at the Kia Oval

08, Jun, 2023 @5:52 PM

Article image
Tenacious Australia offer hope for World Test Championship | Geoff Lemon
The World Test Championship showdown in June will provide a fascinating postscript to India’s Border-Gavaskar series victory

Geoff Lemon in Ahmedabad

13, Mar, 2023 @4:45 PM

Article image
Pat Cummins loses cool but not threat as Australia’s attack excels again | Geoff Lemon
Australian bowlers may have seen chances go down but the fact they produce so many is more significant

Geoff Lemon at the Kia Oval

09, Jun, 2023 @6:00 PM

Article image
Reward or redemption? World Test Championship final looks entirely different for Australia and India | Geoff Lemon
While the two nations face off at The Oval, cricket fans will also be wondering about the future of the fixture

Geoff Lemon in London

06, Jun, 2023 @3:00 PM

Article image
Nathan Lyon’s brave cameo worth so much more than extra runs | Geoff Lemon
The injured Australia spinner went out to bat knowing it would be his last contribution to the match and possibly the Ashes

Geoff Lemon at Lord’s

01, Jul, 2023 @7:36 PM

Article image
The Ashes without Jofra Archer will burn a little less brightly for Australians too | Geoff Lemon
The bowler’s pace and style will be sorely missed, as will the highly anticipated rematch with Steve Smith and company

Geoff Lemon

19, May, 2023 @3:00 PM