How 149 seconds of grainy footage made the case for Michael Vaughan

Over four days in a stuffy Fleet Street room, two and a half minutes of video was spliced and diced

Anyone with a passing interest in the assassination of John F Kennedy knows about the Zapruder film, the silent 8mm sequence shot by Abraham Zapruder as the president’s car drove through Dallas on a fateful day in November 1963. For almost 60 years it has been picked over by experts and conspiracy theorists alike in the hunt for who really killed JFK.

Over four days in a stuffy room on Fleet Street in March, almost as much forensic scrutiny was applied to another grainy video. As Michael Vaughan sat watching the two minutes and 29 seconds of Sky Sports footage, spliced and diced, disputed and fought over, he knew that his reputation and career was on the line.

At the heart of the case were 14 words that the former England captain was alleged to have said to Yorkshire’s Asian players before their Twenty20 match against Nottinghamshire in 2009: “There’s too many of you lot; we have to have a word about that.” The problem for the Cricket Discipline Commission, who heard the case, was there was no equivalent to frame 313, which captured the fatal shot to Kennedy’s head.

However Vaughan’s high-powered legal team still decided to make it a cornerstone of his defence, which ended on Friday with the case against him not being proved. It turned out to be a masterstroke – even though the Sky footage of Yorkshire players in a huddle cut away during the crucial 19 seconds where Azeem Rafiq had alleged that Vaughan had uttered racist and discriminatory words.

Why was it so effective? It helped Vaughan’s case that one of the key witnesses, Adil Rashid, gave every impression of preferring to have faced the great West Indies bowling attacks of the 70s and 80s rather than Vaughan’s counsel, Christopher Stoner KC.

Stoner started by taking Rashid back to the day in 2009, when the incident is said to have taken place.

“Was it a day or night game?” “I can’t recall that,” said Rashid.

“What was the result?” “I can’t remember.”

“Do you remember how many wickets you took?” “Zero.”

Michael Vaughan playing for Yorkshire in 2009
Michael Vaughan playing for Yorkshire in 2009. Photograph: Owen Humphreys/PA

“Do you remember what the weather was like that day?” “No.”

The implication was clear. If Rashid, one of Rafiq’s key witnesses, could not remember the basics of the match, could he really be trusted to remember what had been said?

Stoner then showed Rashid footage of patting his teammate Tim Bresnan before the alleged incident was due to have occurred. “There are no signs of anything untoward,” he pointed out.

Later the panel was also shown frame-by-frame analysis showing how Vaughan had shaken the hand of Rashid 15 seconds into the footage, Rana Naveed-ul-Hasan after 17 seconds, and Ajmal Shahzad at 19 seconds. Furthermore, Stoner noted that Vaughan had also been aware of a cameraman videotaping the team moments before his alleged comments.

With this, Stoner was making two more related points. First, Vaughan – as he had stated in his 2009 autobiography – was proud to have Asian players playing for Yorkshire. And second, that even if he wasn’t, would he really have uttered a racist comment knowing the cameras were there?

The video evidence was also used by Vaughan’s legal team to skewer the ECB’s evidence gathering abilities. The ECB’s director of legal and integrity, Meena Botros, bore the brunt of it as Stoner questioned why they had not interviewed the players, officials or cameraman on the day in question.

“You spoke to Mr Rafiq and you spoke to Mr Shahzad but you didn’t speak to any of the players?” Stoner asked Botros at one point.

“I think that is correct,” came the reply.

“You didn’t speak to any of the umpires?” “No.”

“The cameraman?” “No.”

“Or ask to speak to Mr Vaughan?” “We wrote to him.”

“So you weren’t really interested in looking into the matter, apart from finding corroborating evidence, were you Mr Botros?” “That’s not correct,” came the reply.

It was something Stoner returned to in his closing submission, where he noted that several players had said they had not heard Vaughan say such words before attacking the ECB’s investigation as woefully inadequate. “Due process matters and it is the cornerstone of law,” he said. “But in our submission it was sent on holiday by the ECB. It raises a real question of fairness, which Mr Vaughan has not been afforded.”

Azeem Rafiq batting for Yorkshire in 2016
Azeem Rafiq batting for Yorkshire in 2016. Photograph: Dan Mullan/Getty Images

That struck a chord with the panel, who said in their concluding remarks that the ECB case against Vaughan had not been “sufficiently accurate and reliable”.

But what of the two main protagonists? In his testimony, Rafiq was eloquent and often powerful as he outlined his case and talked of the “mental scars” that he had endured. He did say, however, to having amended the wording of Vaughan’s alleged comments, having originally claimed his teammate said: “There’s too many of you lot, we need to do something about it.”

That was something picked up on by the CDC panel in their decision, which noted the “significant inconsistencies in the evidence of both primary witnesses, Azeem Rafiq and Adil Rashid, in this regard”.

Vaughan was also measured when he gave his evidence, although there were signs of cockiness when questioned about his career by the ECB’s impressive counsel Jane Mulcahy KC. “It’s like a Question of Sport, this,” he said.

But there were uncomfortable moments for him too, with Mulcahy saying that three tweets sent in 2010 and 2017, including one that said “Not many English people live in London. I need to learn a new language,” were indicative of a general pattern. “If a person has a tendency to make racist comments, they have a tendency to make racist comments,” she said.

However, the panel said it gave some weight to the fact it had been an isolated allegation against Vaughan, along with his claim that he would never “put a group of my own teammates into a position where they wouldn’t be able to perform to their maximum, and that’s certainly not what I’m about.”

Ultimately, the panel decided that, on the balance of probabilities it “was more likely than not” that Vaughan had not made those comments.

However, in its closing remarks it also said that: “These findings do not in any way undermine the wider assertions made by Rafiq, many of which of course have been confirmed by the admissions of both Yorkshire and certain individuals, as well as by other findings of this panel.” For those of us who sat through every minute of testimony and evidence, that judgment felt about right.


Sean Ingle

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Vaughan rails at ECB after charge of racist language found unproven
The former England captain Michael Vaughan has been cleared of using racist and/or discriminatory language and bringing the game into disrepute by the ECB’s Cricket Discipline Commission

Simon Burnton

31, Mar, 2023 @5:02 PM

Article image
Michael Vaughan denies using racist language: ‘That’s not what I am about’
The former England captain gave evidence to the Cricket Discipline Commission on a day when Azeem Rafiq was accused of playing ‘the race card’ by Matthew Wood

Sean Ingle

03, Mar, 2023 @7:17 PM

Article image
Ashley Giles suggests Michael Vaughan should be given ‘second chance’
The England managing director has indicated he believes Michael Vaughan should be given a chance to be rehabilitated and resume his media career following allegations of racism made against him

Chris Stocks

28, Nov, 2021 @12:23 PM

Article image
Road to reconciliation after Yorkshire racism saga will be long and difficult
Over almost three years, views have become polarised, Yorkshire CCC has been left on its knees and the human cost spread far and wide

Ali Martin

31, Mar, 2023 @5:27 PM

Article image
Rafiq denies ‘blackmailing’ Rashid to support his Vaughan racism claims
The former Yorkshire player, questioned at the Cricket Discipline Commission hearing, said he did not pressure his sometime teammate to back him up regarding Michael Vaughan

Sean Ingle

02, Mar, 2023 @8:31 PM

Article image
We needed Vaughan to talk about racism years ago, not when he is in the crosshairs | Jonathan Liew
Every day of silence on Azeem Rafiq’s experience was a missed chance to tackle a problem that has blighted English cricket

Jonathan Liew

01, Dec, 2021 @8:00 AM

Article image
It is tempting to see no winners but ECB’s judgment is a victory for Rafiq | Barney Ronay
This saga is an observation porthole into English cricket and, beyond that, Yorkshire CCC and wider society

Barney Ronay

31, Mar, 2023 @8:00 PM

Article image
Cricket has made a start in tackling discrimination – it must see it through | Chris Grant
Though it has shied away from admitting structural racism, English cricket has acknowledged the need for wholesale reform. It’s a start

Chris Grant

26, Nov, 2021 @8:00 PM

Article image
Six former Yorkshire players sanctioned by CDC in Azeem Rafiq racism case
The ECB’s CDC has published its sanctions against the six former Yorkshire players who were found guilty of using racist language towards Azeem Rafiq

Simon Burnton

26, May, 2023 @4:31 PM

Article image
Michael Vaughan returns to BBC cricket coverage for Ashes summer
Michael Vaughan is to play a key part in the BBC’s cricket coverage after being cleared earlier this year of making a racist remark when he was a player

Simon Burnton

19, May, 2023 @12:08 PM