Rugby Australia banks on TV package to be greater than sum of its parts | Bret Harris

A ‘whole of game’ deal is on the table in an attempt to increase the current $57m a year arrangement

In the Seinfeld episode The Pitch, Jerry and George propose an idea for a “show about nothing” to American television network NBC. When the fictional NBC executive Russell Dalrymple asks them: “Why am I watching it?”, George replies: “Because it’s on TV.” Dalrymple says: “Not yet.”

Rugby Australia is pitching a “whole of game” package to broadcasters, including Optus, in an attempt to achieve a significant uplift on its current $57m-a-year deal with Fox Sports. The package involves the Wallabies, Wallaroos, Australia’s four Super Rugby teams, the men’s and women’s Olympic sevens teams, the National Rugby Championship and a new national club competition.

Importantly, Rugby Australia is seeking free-to-air coverage for Super Rugby to grow the game beyond the confines of pay TV where it has been with Fox Sports for the past 25 years. But will disgruntled rugby fans watch all of this content just because it’s on TV?

Of all those rugby products, so to speak, it is only the Wallabies – and to a lesser extent the NSW Waratahs and Queensland Reds – who have any real capacity to generate TV ratings and subscriptions to drive revenue for the game. The rest of the products are costs, investments if you like, rather than income generators, although the national sevens programs receive valuable Olympic funding.

Yet, Rugby Australia has bundled all of these products together in a “love me, love my dog” approach to the broadcast negotiations. RA is banking on the “whole of game” package to be greater than the sum of its parts, echoing the TEAM acronym – together everyone achieves more.

There must be something attractive about the whole-of-game package because Fox Sports attempted to spoil RA’s strategy by making a play for the rights to the Sydney and Brisbane club competitions. In a rare show of unity in Australian rugby the clubs decided to remain with RA.

Why did Fox Sports try to secure club rugby? The pay TV network had never shown much interest in the grassroots before. It suggested RA’s TV rights would be more valuable if it went to market with a comprehensive package.

RA was desperate to include Sydney and Brisbane club rugby, even to the point of negotiating a $3.7m buyout from current rights holders Channel Seven and Club Rugby TV to return the Sydney club rugby rights to the Sydney Rugby Union. But since 2015 it was costing the Sydney clubs $300,000 a year to have their games shown on 7Two, while ratings have reportedly declined since matches were televised on the ABC.

How will club rugby, which has intangible benefits as a community program, add commercial value to RA’s broadcast agreement?

RA has confirmed it is investigating a national club competition, but the format will not be determined until consultation with the successful broadcaster. There has been strong speculation RA will create an FA Cup-style knockout competition involving Australia’s top clubs. A national club competition is an appealing concept, but RA must ensure the costs do not outweigh the benefits.

Following the initial success of the National Soccer League and the National Basketball League in the 1970s and 1980s there was a rush to national sporting competitions. Every sport from tiddlywinks to Twister seemed to go national, but national competitions are not for everyone. Geographically, Australia is the sixth biggest country in the world. It is difficult for minor sports – or competitions – to compete nationally because of travel and accommodation costs unless they are subsidised.

Whatever club concept RA decides to follow, it must make sure it is based on a sound economic model or the competition could potentially erode any financial gains achieved in the new broadcast deal in the same way the costs of Super Rugby over-expansion wiped out previous increases in TV revenue.

The “rainmakers” in Australian rugby remain the Wallabies, Waratahs and Reds, who subsidise just about everybody else. RA is hoping the new Wallabies head coach, Dave Rennie, will turn the Australian team around, lifting them up from seventh in the world, their worst ever result, to a top-two or top-three position.

But Rennie needs Australia’s Super Rugby teams to prepare players for Test rugby. The signs so far are not encouraging. After three rounds of the new season Australia’s teams are zero and six against foreign opposition, while three of the four sides are in the bottom half of the table.

There are already predictions the winless Waratahs’ season is over following their 24-10 defeat against the Melbourne Rebels in the Victorian capital on Friday, while the Reds are also winless after losing against the Jaguares 43-27 in Buenos Aires on Sunday. At least the Brumbies showed they were competitive in their heartbreaking 23-22 defeat by the Highlanders in Canberra on Saturday but, sadly, they do not rate on TV.

Australian rugby is in danger of becoming a show about nothing, or at least, nothing much. The Big Three – Wallabies, Waratahs and Reds – must start winning because no one is going to watch just because they are on TV.


Bret Harris

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
No excuse for Rugby Australia raiding a Super Rugby franchise | Bret Harris
The Wallabies want Dan McKellar but the Brumbies coach is already making a vital contribution to the national cause

Bret Harris

04, Mar, 2020 @4:30 PM

Article image
Rugby Australia descends into chaos after familiar boardroom turmoil | Bret Harris
Genuine reform will only be achieved when the system of selecting the board is changed

Bret Harris

07, May, 2020 @5:30 PM

Article image
Clock ticks for Rugby Australia to avoid mass player exodus | Bret Harris
Without an income-generating competition, the three Queensland players may not be the last to walk away

Bret Harris

26, May, 2020 @5:30 PM

Article image
Rugby armistice with New Zealand still leaves Australia with plenty to do | Matt McILraith
Rugby Australia appears to have emerged a winner from the trans-Tasman saga but sporting politics rarely stands still

Matt McILraith

24, Aug, 2020 @5:30 PM

Article image
Rugby Australia spruiks interesting new concepts but standard of play remains paramount | Bret Harris
Unless a renewed emphasis is placed on high performance, endeavours to promote the game with a new broadcast package will be for naught

Bret Harris

11, Aug, 2020 @1:21 AM

Article image
Rugby Australia head into unknown after taking calculated risk with Nine and Stan | Bret Harris
The contra component of the deal may be valuable but RA will really hope to create growth with the free-to-air coverage of Super Rugby

Bret Harris

09, Nov, 2020 @4:30 PM

Article image
Israel Folau sacked over social media posts after panel rules in favour of Rugby Australia
Israel Folau’s rugby career appears over after an independent panel backed Rugby Australia’s intention to terminate his four-year, $4m contract following the player’s controversial social media posts

Mike Hytner

17, May, 2019 @8:17 AM

Article image
Wallabies' generosity cannot mask depth of Rugby Australia's financial hole | Bret Harris
From RA’s perspective the new interim pay deal was a smart play but it is only a short-term fix

Bret Harris

29, Sep, 2020 @5:30 PM

Article image
Nine's Stan plan is on the rise but Waratahs sinking fast in Super Rugby AU | Bret Harris
All five franchises – especially the biggest in the land – must be competitive if the free-to-air experiment is to be successful

Bret Harris

22, Feb, 2021 @4:30 PM

Article image
Australia’s future rugby landscape to be shaped by pay cut talks | Bret Harris
Rugby Australia’s plan is to survive for the next three months, but there is no certainty about what happens after that

Bret Harris

30, Mar, 2020 @11:25 PM