Stonewall ‘malicious’ in legal fight against Allison Bailey, tribunal hears

Barrister involved in employment tribunal with her chambers and leading LGBTQ+ charity

Stonewall has been “high-handed and malicious” in its ongoing legal fight against a gender critical barrister, her lawyer has told the final day of an employment tribunal.

The barrister Allison Bailey is suing her chambers, Garden Court, and the LGBTQ+ charity. She claims she was offered lower-quality work after she voiced her opposition to the nationwide Stonewall diversity champion scheme when it was announced at her chambers in December 2018. Stonewall’s programme provides advice and assessments for inclusive workplaces.

Bailey said she was asked by her chambers to delete two tweets criticising the LGBTQ+ charity’s position on trans rights, which Stonewall had complained about. She refused to do so.

In closing submissions on the final day of the four-week long tribunal on Monday, Bailey’s lawyer, Ben Cooper QC, said Stonewall had tried to get the tribunal to reject her claim.

Cooper told the employment judge Sarah Goodman that GCC and Stonewall had attempted to frame Bailey as waging a “political campaign” against the charity, founded in 1989, rather than a legitimate complaint.

“[They] mount an extraordinary attack on this tribunal for ‘indulging the claimant’s claim and the evidence she’s given to support this’, and do so in a way that implies a degree of pressure … to encourage this tribunal to reject the claim for fear of being seen to have assisted the claimant too much,” Cooper said.

He told the tribunal that the alleged approach was “characteristic of the high-handed, malicious and oppressive way in which they have dealt with this litigation”, as well as “issues before the litigation”.

Goodman replied: “We’re pretty thick-skinned, so we’re just going to look at the facts and the evidence.”

Stonewall accused Bailey of being “literally the author of her own misfortune” and in written submissions said she gave “self-serving and evasive” evidence and “failed to take responsibility for her actions and the consequences which flowed from them”.

“Her ignorant, inflammatory and ill-judged social media posts generated complaints which her chambers was obliged to investigate,” it said.

In 2019 Bailey co-founded the LGB Alliance group – an organisation for lesbian, gay and bisexual people to provide an alternative to Stonewall and which opposes its policies on transgender issues – and tweeted in support of its launch.

Bailey claims that the tweet attracted online abuse, including death threats, “memes with firearms” in them and messages accusing her of being a “terf” – an acronym of the term “trans-exclusionary radical feminist”.

Within 48 hours, her chambers had posted a tweet saying Bailey was under investigation. The tribunal was told that this gave credence to internet “trolls” who accused her of being transphobic.

Cooper argued on Monday that Bailey’s chambers “sought to downplay that abuse” and breached a confidentiality obligation by announcing she was under investigation.

“Not only was the response tweet sent out in breach of the confidentiality obligation, but it was sent out without even the courtesy of a heads-up from heads of chambers,” he said.

In response, GCC’s barrister, Andrew Hochhauser, said that any response from the chambers had not deterred Bailey in her tweeting.

Contributor

Harry Taylor and agency

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Barrister was discriminated against for gender-critical views, tribunal hears
Allison Bailey says Garden Court chambers and Stonewall wrongly treated her gender-critical views as transphobic

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

29, Apr, 2022 @12:23 PM

Article image
Law chambers discriminated against gender-critical barrister, tribunal rules
Panel awards Allison Bailey payout in row over trans rights but rejects her claim against Stonewall

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

27, Jul, 2022 @4:32 PM

Article image
Maya Forstater was discriminated against over gender-critical beliefs, tribunal rules
Researcher lost job at thinktank after tweeting that transgender women could not change their biological sex

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

06, Jul, 2022 @3:27 PM

Article image
Tribunal rulings for gender-critical women have key implications
Analysis: recent cases strengthen protections for debate, but questions remain around workplace conflicts

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

29, Jul, 2022 @7:00 AM

Article image
Gender-critical views are a protected belief, appeal tribunal rules
Maya Forstater lost initial legal challenge brought when her contract was not renewed after tweet dispute

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

10, Jun, 2021 @11:33 AM

Article image
Allison Bailey case is a microcosm of the wider debate about transgender rights
Barrister’s unlawful discrimination case sees levels of engagement rare for an employment tribunal

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

19, Jun, 2022 @8:07 PM

Article image
Woman who lost job after tweeting view on biological sex awarded £100,000
Award follows tribunal ruling that Maya Forstater was unfairly discriminated against because of her gender-critical beliefs

Miranda Bryant

01, Jul, 2023 @10:57 AM

Article image
Human rights body exits Stonewall UK’s diversity scheme
Equality and Human Rights Commission allows membership to lapse over ‘value for money’

Sarah Marsh

24, May, 2021 @12:54 PM

Sacked oboist was 'bullied' by conductor, tribunal hears
Welsh National Opera musician claims unfair dismissal after 1994 incident triggered years of 'persistent abuse'

Steven Morris and agency

13, Oct, 2010 @4:58 PM

Article image
Priti Patel faces tribunal questioning over alleged bullying
Exclusive: lawyers for Patel’s former permanent secretary Sir Philip Rutnam push forward constructive dismissal claim

Rajeev Syal

05, Oct, 2020 @3:19 PM