Maya Forstater was discriminated against over gender-critical beliefs, tribunal rules

Researcher lost job at thinktank after tweeting that transgender women could not change their biological sex

A researcher who lost her job at a thinktank after tweeting that transgender women could not change their biological sex has won her claim that she was unfairly discriminated against because of her gender-critical beliefs.

Maya Forstater suffered direct discrimination when the Centre for Global Development (CGD), where she was a visiting fellow, did not renew her contract or fellowship, an employment tribunal found on Wednesday.

The tribunal also ruled that Forstater, the executive director of Sex Matters, suffered victimisation with respect to the removal of her profile from CGD’s website.

Its decision comes after Forstater successfully brought a test case to establish that gender-critical views are a protected philosophical belief under the Equality Act. She initially lost that case at an employment tribunal in 2019 but won a landmark decision on appeal last year, with the judge stressing that while gender-critical views might be “profoundly offensive and even distressing to many others … they are beliefs that are and must be tolerated in a pluralist society”.

The case was then sent back to the tribunal to decide whether Forstater’s claim had been proved on the facts. It upheld two complaints of direct discrimination and one of victimisation. Two other complaints of direct discrimination and one of victimisation were unsuccessful.

The judgment stated: “Absent an explanation from the respondents, the facts are such that the tribunal could properly conclude that the tweets were a substantial part of the reason why Ms Forstater was not offered employment; and the respondent’s evidence, far from proving the contrary, supports the finding that they were …

“We reminded ourselves that it would be an error to treat a mere statement of Ms Forstater’s protected belief as inherently unreasonable or inappropriate.”

The tribunal examined a number of tweets by Forstater, including tweets in which she drew an analogy between self-identifying trans women and Rachel Dolezal, a white American woman who misrepresented herself as black, and another in which she said: “A man’s internal feeling that he is a woman has no basis in material reality.” It concluded that the tweets asserted her gender-critical beliefs.

It said the same of one that described self-identification as a woman as “a feeling in their head”, rejecting the suggestion that it equated self-identification with mental illness.

The tribunal also considered tweets in which Forstater said she was surprised people could say they believed that males could be women, and that they are “tying themselves in knots”.

It said they were “fairly mild examples” of mockery, adding: “Mocking or satirising the opposing view is part of the common currency of debate.”

The three-member panel, led by the employment judge Andrew Glennie, said a description of a Credit Suisse executive, Pips Bunce, who identified as a woman for part of the week, as a “part-time cross dresser” could have been put in “more moderate terms”.

But two of the three panel members said it “did not amount to an objectionable or inappropriate manifestation of Ms Forstater’s belief, given the context of a debate on a matter of public interest; the fact that Pips Bunce had put themself forward in public as a person who is gender fluid and who dresses sometimes as a woman and sometimes as a man”.

Sign up to First Edition, our free daily newsletter – every weekday morning at 7am BST

Responding to the decision, Forstater said: “My case matters for everyone who believes in the importance of truth and free speech. We are all free to believe whatever we wish. What we are not free to do is compel others to believe the same thing, to silence those who disagree with us or to force others to deny reality.”

She also thanked JK Rowling for standing by her. The Harry Potter author tweeted: “Every woman who’s been harassed, silenced, bullied or lost employment because of her gender critical beliefs is freer and safer today, thanks to the warrior that is @MForstater.”

Stonewall, the LGBTQ+ campaign group, said: “Today’s judgment … does not change the reality of trans people’s workplace protection. No one has the right to discriminate against, or harass, trans people simply because they disagree with their existence and participation in society.”

Amanda Glassman, chief executive of CGD, said: “We are reviewing today’s judgment, which found in favour of Ms Forstater on some claims, and dismissed others. CGD’s primary aim has always been to uphold our values and maintain a workplace and an environment that is welcoming, safe, and inclusive to all, including trans people.”

Remedies will be determined at a later date.


Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Law chambers discriminated against gender-critical barrister, tribunal rules
Panel awards Allison Bailey payout in row over trans rights but rejects her claim against Stonewall

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

27, Jul, 2022 @4:32 PM

Article image
Barrister was discriminated against for gender-critical views, tribunal hears
Allison Bailey says Garden Court chambers and Stonewall wrongly treated her gender-critical views as transphobic

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

29, Apr, 2022 @12:23 PM

Article image
Gender-critical views are a protected belief, appeal tribunal rules
Maya Forstater lost initial legal challenge brought when her contract was not renewed after tweet dispute

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

10, Jun, 2021 @11:33 AM

Article image
Addison Lee wrongly classed drivers as self-employed, tribunal rules
Verdict in test case brought by three drivers against minicab firm could lead to wave of claims for unpaid wages and holiday pay

Robert Booth

25, Sep, 2017 @3:35 PM

Article image
Ethical veganism is a belief protected by law, tribunal rules
Man sacked by League Against Cruel Sports told he is entitled to equality protections

Damien Gayle

03, Jan, 2020 @2:12 PM

Article image
Tribunal rulings for gender-critical women have key implications
Analysis: recent cases strengthen protections for debate, but questions remain around workplace conflicts

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

29, Jul, 2022 @7:00 AM

Article image
Jonás Gutiérrez wins case against Newcastle over cancer treatment
Tribunal rules football club discriminated against midfielder by stopping his selection to avoid extending contract

Nazia Parveen North of England correspondent

14, Apr, 2016 @5:32 PM

Article image
Countess fired housekeeper over pregnancy, tribunal told
Housekeeper at Surrey home of Maya Von Schoenburg, former wife of Mercedes-Benz heir, awarded £19,000 in damages

Steven Morris and agency

05, Aug, 2013 @7:54 PM

Article image
Court rules Addison Lee drivers are workers, not self-employed
Drivers are entitled to national minimum wage and paid holiday, tribunal finds

Robert Booth Social affairs correspondent

14, Nov, 2018 @12:29 PM

Article image
Judges win pensions discrimination claim against MoJ
More than 200 judges whose entitlements were cut argued they suffered age, gender and race discrimination

Owen Bowcott Legal affairs correspondent

16, Jan, 2017 @1:54 PM