Labour must seize the initiative on social care | Letters

Social care should be fully returned to the public sector, writes David Hinchliffe, while Pam Clarke says privatisation has been a failed experiment and Roger Fisken says Labour should defend high taxes for decent public service provision

Your editorial concerning Boris Johnson’s announcement on health and social care funding (7 September) rightly draws attention to the detrimental effects of the organisational split between two branches of the same tree. The ludicrous situation of having free care on one side and charges on the other is made even more laughable when no one is able to establish the division between the two with any certainty.

Pre-Tony Blair, the Labour party was seriously looking at the idea of a formal merger between the NHS and social care, and the principle has been endorsed by the Commons’ health committee on a number of occasions. The extension of universal taxpayer-funded provision to enable free social care hasn’t just been a problem for the Conservatives, but also for New Labour. However, alongside a gradual return of social care to the public sector, it is the only way to effectively address what Johnson terms the “crisis” in the sector, and your editorial correctly points out how this could be funded.

The government proposes to throw additional resources at a failing system it is doing absolutely nothing to reform. Not only has it put the cart before the horse, the horse hasn’t even turned up.
David Hinchliffe
Former Labour MP for Wakefield and past chair of health committee

• Boris Johnson’s foray into the social care quagmire (Boris Johnson stakes reputation on £12bn fix for health and social care, 7 September) is surely an opportunity for Keir Starmer and the Labour party to enunciate both broad, progressive principles and some of the specifics proposed in Andy Burnham’s 2010 white paper.

Rather than score points about breaking election promises regarding taxation, Labour should welcome and reinforce the message that a national care service will cost money. The only question is how this is to be raised as equitably and progressively as possible. Andy Burnham’s proposal to impose a 10% estate levy was panned as a “death tax” at the time, but would surely fare better amid the current furore about unpalatable alternatives that set young against old and north against south, etc.

Having seized the initiative, it should then be possible to hammer a few home truths that would enjoy broad consensus. For example, the Thatcher experiment has run its course and the consequent diminution of local democracy has created anomalies between real care costs and savagely reduced local authority budgets, which the government’s proposals will not resolve. Privatising and cost cutting have resulted in hedge fund values and a disastrous shortfall in staffing. The time has come to declare the experiment a failure and consign it to history.

The appeal of back to the future has been demonstrated all too starkly over recent years. Who’s to say that Labour couldn’t turn it to its progressive advantage in this most sensitive of contexts?
Pam Clarke
Horsham, West Sussex

• Frances Ryan (Boris Johnson has created a ‘social care plan’ without any plan for social care, 7 September) is correct in saying that social care needs to be transformed, that radical thinking is needed, and that its provision needs to be more like that of healthcare as provided by the NHS. So when is the Labour party, the architect of the NHS, going to take this on? When is it going to make clear that the Tories’ self-description as a low-tax party actually means that it is a high-greed party, that tax is what pays for decent levels of public provision, and that the countries in Europe that have the best quality of life are those whose governments take more tax and use it to help everyone, especially those in greatest need?
Roger Fisken
Reading, Berkshire

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication.

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Taxing matter of solving the social care crisis | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to the news that the over-40s would start contributing towards the cost of care in later life under plans being considered by ministers

Letters

27, Jul, 2020 @3:11 PM

Article image
There is no magic fix for our social care crisis | Letters
Letters: Readers react to government proposals for the NHS to take over the management of social care

Letters

30, Jul, 2020 @4:49 PM

Article image
Privatisation continues to threaten our NHS | Letters
Letters: With the National Health Service a prominent issue in this general election, readers air their views

Letters

08, Dec, 2019 @5:23 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on funding social care: break the tax taboo | Editorial
Editorial: Fear of levelling with the public about the real choices leads to political inaction and costs lives

Editorial

06, Feb, 2019 @6:25 PM

Article image
NHS cash is welcome but is it all an illusion? | Letters
Letters: Frank Field MP, Giuseppe Bignardi, Colin Pritchard and Peter Roderick on the merits or otherwise of Theresa May’s funding plans

Letters

08, Jan, 2019 @6:47 PM

Article image
Care home crisis is the result of years of neglect | Letters
Letters: Bill Shaw says the Thatcher government systematically dismantled social care provision, while Les Bright highlights what went wrong with private services. Plus letters from Tom Wilson and Janet Broadmore

Letters

03, Jun, 2020 @5:38 PM

Article image
Using national insurance to fund social care is regressive and unfair | Letters
Letters: We should scrap NI and replace it with taxes on income and profit, writes Adrian Darnell, while Janet Briffett believes the poor will end up paying for the well-off

Letters

05, Sep, 2021 @3:51 PM

Article image
Flaws in Tories’ plans for cap on social care costs | Letters
Letters: David Lipsey says the cost of care is not borne by older people but by those who stand to inherit their assets, Sally Hughes makes a case for a National Health and Disability Service, while Gillian Dalley points out that the details provided by the government are shamefully and deliberately vague

Letters

21, Nov, 2021 @6:35 PM

Article image
Private care homes are a failed model | Letter
Letter: An overstretched NHS is being forced to pick up the pieces when private care homes go bust, writes Gillian Dalley

Letters

18, Mar, 2019 @7:22 PM

Article image
Why Britain needs a national care service | Letters
Letters: Alan Walker on the history of care home ownership, Gillian Dalley on the prospect of a cross-party agreement, Jennifer Knowles on discrimination against those with dementia, and Dr Simon Gibbs and Ann Jolly on Boris Johnson’s claim that ‘too many care homes didn’t really follow the procedures’

Letters

07, Jul, 2020 @4:22 PM