Government urged to scrap 'nasty' two-child limit on benefits

Figures show nearly 600,000 children are adversely affected by policy

Campaigners have called for the government to scrap the “nasty” two-child limit on benefits after the latest official figures showed that nearly 600,000 children were affected by the controversial policy.

Although the government promoted it as a way to persuade people into work, Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) statistics published on Wednesday show those most affected by the limit were working families. Of the 161,000 households affected since the policy was introduced, 59% had at least one adult in work.

The limit means restricts the child allowance in universal credit and tax credits – worth £2,780 a year – is only paid for the first two children in a family. It does not affect children born before April 2017.

Ministers promoted the policy as a way to make households take responsibility, by teaching them that “children cost money” and discouraging them from having a third child.

Research published earlier this year found nearly all families affected by the limit – which leaves them £53 a week worse off – had cut back on essentials such as food, medication, heating, clothing, as well as after-school clubs. Some parents said they had considered having terminations when they discovered the policy after getting pregnant.

The Conservative peer Philippa Stroud, a former adviser to the former work and pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith, said ministers should consider scrapping the policy if current trends showing a rise in poverty among families with at least three children continued.

Lady Stroud chairs the independent cross-party Social Metrics Commission, which this week published its latest poverty analysis. This highlighted a nine percentage point rise in larger family poverty since 2014.

She said this was not just the result of the two-child cap, which only came in two years ago, but added: “Given the increase in poverty already seen for families with three or more children, it is important that policymakers monitor the impact of the two-child policy carefully, and are willing to reconsider the policy approach if the data shows it is increasing poverty among larger families.”

Alison Garnham, of the Chid Poverty Action Group (CPAG), said: “Every child deserves a good start in life, but today’s figures are a grim reminder of the human cost of this nasty policy, which says that some children are more deserving than others purely on the basis of their birth order – and which mostly affects working families.

“In the UK we would never turn a third-born child away from school or hospital. How can it be right to deny the same young children the support they need to enjoy a childhood free from poverty when their family falls on hard times?”

Just 4% of families received an exemption from the two-child limit, mainly on the basis that the third child was the result of a multiple birth. There were 510 exemptions under the “rape clause” – when the mother proved to officials that the child had been born as a result of rape.

There is concern that the policy will exacerbate a dramatic rise in families with at least three children moving into poverty since 2014 – a nine percentage point increase that is yet to take into account the effect of the two-child policy. According to the CPAG, it will plunge about 300,000 more families into poverty by 2024, by which time 1.8m children will be affected.

In a letter to the Times on Wednesday, 109 social policy academics said the policy was “quite simply one of the most damaging changes to the social security system ever”. It had delivered “unprecedented cuts to the living standards of the poorest children in Britain”.

The Scottish National party MP Alison Thewliss said: “Across the UK, the majority of those who have been affected by the two-child limit are in work and receiving low income, highlighting the inaccuracy of the UK government’s position of pitting working people against those on benefits.”

A government spokesperson said: “This policy ensures fairness by asking families receiving benefits to face the same financial choices as families supporting themselves solely through work. Safeguards are in place and we’ve made changes this year to make the policy fairer.”

Contributor

Patrick Butler Social policy editor

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Poorest families to lose out on £210 a year owing to benefits cap
Resolution Foundation analysis shows freeze imposed in 2015 is hitting low-income households with children

Heather Stewart and Richard Partington

13, Oct, 2018 @6:00 AM

Article image
Iain Duncan Smith moves to downgrade child poverty targets

Work and pensions secretary seeks to split measure of poverty from income alone and weigh up range of new indicators

Hélène Mulholland and Patrick Wintour

14, Jun, 2012 @9:29 AM

Letters: Life on the economic precipice
Letters: At present, 58% of children living in poverty live in households where at least one adult works and the number is rising

20, Jun, 2012 @7:59 PM

Article image
IFS picks the budget to pieces … again
The economics thinktank has once again identified, then costed, the gap between George Osborne’s rhetoric and reality

Larry Elliott

09, Jul, 2015 @6:05 PM

Article image
'Two-child policy' cuts benefits of more than 70,000 families
Campaigners warn poverty will rise as low-income families lose financial support

Patrick Butler Social policy editor

28, Jun, 2018 @2:24 PM

Article image
Benefits and child credits squeeze pushes 200,000 children into poverty

Government admits statistic that Labour says shows children are victims of Tory 'games' and 'economic failure'

Patrick Wintour, political editor

17, Jan, 2013 @4:24 PM

Article image
My fellow MPs need to know what I have learned from working families
As a former obstetrician, the MP Dan Poulter thought he knew all about the struggles of young families. But visiting them has opened his eyes to new problems

Dan Poulter

18, Mar, 2012 @12:06 AM

Article image
Welfare shakeup 'will push a quarter of a million children into poverty'
Analysis for the Guardian finds changes due on 6 April will also wipe thousands off payments for bereaved families

Patrick Butler and Anushka Asthana

02, Apr, 2017 @7:00 PM

Article image
Tories likely to freeze working-age benefits to rein in welfare spending
George Osborne plans to cut billions off tax credits bill, which could reduce income of a working-poor family with one child by £350 a year

Patrick Collinson

04, Dec, 2014 @7:27 PM

Article image
Child benefit reforms will push 320,000 families over 50% tax rate
For families with one adult earning over £50,000, child benefit will have to be returned through higher tax payments

Patrick Wintour, political editor

04, Jan, 2013 @3:27 PM