Separating fact from hype in the study of cancer and obesity | Letters

Findings of a report from Cancer Research UK about cancer in women are challenged by David Steinsaltz

The recent report by Cancer Research UK (Obesity set to be bigger cause of cancer in women than smoking, 24 September) hypes a very minor and unsurprising result – that the fraction of cancers attributable to smoking in the UK may be expected to decline modestly over the next quarter century – by emphasising a notional crossover point when female cancers attributable to overweight and obesity will exceed those attributable to smoking. Cancer due to obesity is portrayed as a rising public health threat, despite the fact that it is projected to change hardly at all and despite the fact that the great success in combating tobacco consumption still leaves tobacco as the leading cause of preventable cancer now and for the next 25 years, even if we accept the study’s methodology.

As for the methodology: the largest number of female cancers attributed to overweight in the main source cited in the report are breast cancers. The source assumes without comment that smoking has no effect on breast cancer. Multiple studies from other countries have found, by contrast, a substantial effect, which would raise the cancer burden of tobacco, and so push this crossover point into the distant future.

Furthermore, lumping all of these very different malignancies together to compute a trend for cancer is misleading. The two most common cancers attributable to obesity in women – cancer of the breast and uterus – are among the most survivable, with ten-year survival above 75%. The next two most common would be bowel and bladder cancer, with ten-year survival above 50%. The cancer caused by smoking, on the other hand, is primarily lung cancer, with ten-year survival around 7%, followed by oesophageal (13%), pancreatic (1%), bowel and bladder.

While increasing corpulence is doubtless detrimental to public health, all else being equal, it is probably better to stay off the obesity-apocalypse bandwagon until the data objectively carry us aboard.
David Steinsaltz
Associate professor of statistics, University of Oxford

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Womb cancer and obesity link must not be ignored | Letter
Letter: The myth that people can be obese and healthy is pervasive, writes Dr Jonathan Riley

Letters

19, Sep, 2022 @4:13 PM

Article image
Cancer, obesity and Boris Johnson’s ‘sin tax’ error | Letters
Letters: Graham MacGregor says all the evidence suggests taxing unhealthy foods helps reduce their consumption. Plus letters from John Boaler and David Smyth

Letters

07, Jul, 2019 @4:39 PM

Article image
Enoch Powell failed to introduce tests for cervical cancer | Letter from Sir Harold Evans
Letters: Sir Harold Evans on Enoch Powell

Letters

13, Feb, 2018 @5:40 PM

Article image
Finding moments of joy amid the pain of living with cancer | Letters
Letters: Alison Jesson developed a philosophy to explore and connect with the world, while another reader found their treatment gruelling

Letters

27, May, 2022 @5:39 PM

Article image
Breast cancer risk increases with age | Letters
Letters: Diana Roxburgh (aged 78) asks why women over 70 are no longer invited for screening as a matter of policy

Letters

04, May, 2018 @3:40 PM

Article image
Leading the fight against child obesity | Letters
Letters: Iain Malcolm says South Tyneside council is taking a tough line on planning applications for fast food takeaways; Joe Irvin says getting children more active is the key

Letters

25, Jul, 2018 @4:53 PM

Article image
Vending machines are feeding obesity | Letter
Letter: Sam White suggests a partnership between machine operators and the NHS could reap healthy benefits

Letters

19, Apr, 2022 @4:18 PM

Article image
Food education key to tackling obesity | Letter
Letter: The government’s £2bn walking and cycling initiative is a classic kneejerk response that will not address the problem, writes Tom McNab

Letters

05, Aug, 2020 @4:28 PM

Article image
To fight obesity, we must first raise incomes | Letters
Letters: Too often healthy food is unaffordable or inaccessible to the poorest families, writes Andrew Forsey, while Dr Helen Holt says food insecurity may be behind the link between obesity and poverty

Letters

12, Aug, 2020 @4:53 PM

Article image
Our obesity crisis and its many different causes | Letters
Letters: Readers discuss ways to combat the UK’s excessive sugar consumption and the large amounts contained in processed food and drinks

Letters

19, Aug, 2018 @4:38 PM