Disabled people failed by labyrinthine benefits system | Letters

Letters: The Department for Work and Pensions is bent on causing distress to all categories of disabled people

I have every sympathy with the “not really disabled” of Aditya Chakrabortty’s article (One ‘not really disabled’ man has won against the system. But I can’t celebrate, 28 February) – but I’d emphasise that what our government would call the “really disabled” are dealt the same spiteful treatment. It is now nine months since my deeply disabled niece was declared fit for work, and lost her ESA (employment and support allowance) and PIP (personal independence payment): a decision entirely due to the cheapskate assessment procedures introduced by Iain Duncan Smith, devised by Atos, and perpetuated by the American firm Maximus.

My niece has been subjected to nine months of very damaging stress and anxiety. Her ESA was restored when, after five months, a benefit support tribunal ruled, without her appearing, that her case was incontrovertible; the question of her lifeline PIP is still outstanding and the Department for Work and Pensions refuses to say if any back payment will be made. All the evidence shows that the DWP, at the service of “austerity”, is bent on causing distress to all categories of disabled people, “really disabled” as well as “not really disabled”.
Jane Taylor
Penrith

• Aditya Chakrabortty is right to rage against a test that is more about ability to navigate a labyrinthine, heartless system than about ability to work. Things are about to get worse. The earnings-replacement benefit ESA has two categories: the support group for the most incapacitated; and the work-related activity group (WRAG) for those expected to prepare for work. Subject to a stringent means-test after a year, WRAG claimants have until now been paid £102.15 per week.

But from next month, new ESA claimants allocated to the WRAG will receive only the £73.10 paid to claimants of jobseeker’s allowance. This amount, pitifully inadequate for anyone, is even more so for sick/disabled people both because they may have greater needs and because their claims often last much longer. Around 20% of current JSA claims were started two years ago or more. The equivalent figure for WRAG claims is over 70% – and some WRAG claimants may never be fit to return to work. In years of unemployment, clothes wear out, furnishings sag, appliances break down – and there is no money to replace them.

The proportion of ESA applicants assigned to the WRAG on assessment increased through 2016. New claimants who suffer this fate after 3 April are liable to face many years of illness in dire poverty. For them, the safety net that was incapacity benefit, the predecessor to ESA, has been more or less abolished.
Patricia de Wolfe
London

Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Spending on benefits for disabled people is increasing | Letters
Letters: Sarah Newton, minister for disabled people, defends the government’s record, and Martin Pilgrim says Tory MPs being shocked by austerity is nothing new

Letters

01, Feb, 2019 @4:41 PM

Article image
Injustice of the benefits system | Letters
Letters: Anne Williams does not think she will ever recover from an experience that nearly left her homeless, Jane Bonnick is shocked that the government can preside over such cruelty and Hester Fairclough says cuts and the housing crisis have created a perfect storm

Letters

08, Mar, 2019 @4:45 PM

Article image
Areas of confusion in Britain’s benefits system | Letters
Letters: It is very sad that the task of reforming and revitalising support for the poorest should be taking place under a Tory government

Letters

08, Nov, 2016 @7:09 PM

Article image
A positive case for collectively provided benefits | Letters
Letters: The argument that benefit cuts are mean and arbitrary underplays their ideological significance

Letters

04, Apr, 2017 @6:06 PM

Article image
Disabled man’s death after his benefits were stopped brings back sad memories | Letters
Letters: Jane Ghosh, whose son died in 2018, says the assessment process is severe, Dr Chris Grover says Errol Graham’s death was a social murder, and Amanda Theunissen is struggling to be grateful for a 25p pension increase

Letters

03, Feb, 2020 @6:51 PM

Letters: The benefits of a civilised society
Letters: For hundreds of thousands of families across the country this amendment could mean the difference between making ends meet and living in hardship

31, Jan, 2012 @9:00 PM

Article image
The benefits system dial is set to brutal | Letters
Letters: Does the unacceptable risk lie in denying many of the truly deserving with harsh, rigid tests and long frustrating processes of appeal?

Letters

07, May, 2017 @6:34 PM

Article image
Our benefits system has become a racket for cheating poor people | Aditya Chakrabortty
A disabled woman’s plea for help ends in tears and humiliation – that’s how the process works, says Guardian columnist Aditya Chakrabortty

Aditya Chakrabortty

02, Jan, 2018 @6:00 AM

Article image
Disabled people's benefit system needs reform, says minister
Work and pensions minister Steve Webb accepts reform is necessary for Atos-approved employment support allowance

Daniel Boffey

17, Sep, 2011 @8:29 PM

Article image
Jeremy Hunt’s remarks show a lack of respect for working people | Letters
Letters: His notion that things are as they are because British people don’t work as hard as others is an insult to many working hard for long hours in insecure employment

Letters

06, Oct, 2015 @8:01 PM