We need better palliative care, not assisted dying | Zara Aziz

As the assisted dying bill receives its second reading in parliament, the risk of causing harm far outweighs any potential benefits

When I first started out as a junior doctor on the wards, it was all about defying death. As doctors, we are taught to save lives or alleviate suffering through our medical expertise, but not to end lives. Those of us who were on the “crash” team would run like the wind as soon as our bleeps signalled a cardiac arrest. The most senior member of the attending team would usually coordinate the arrest and end resuscitation attempts after a period of time.

The assisted dying bill receives its second reading in the Commons on 11 September. If adopted, it would mean that a terminally ill patient – who has less than six months to live – could be prescribed and aided in taking a lethal medication that would end their life. The application would first need approval by two doctors, one of whom would be the attending medical practitioner while the other would be independent. They would assess the patient’s capacity to make an informed decision without coercion or duress. This would be followed by an application to the high court to grant approval to assist death. It would be the attending doctor who would be asked to prescribe and aid the patient until they died, but not administer the medication for them.Previously, the bill did not include involvement of a judge in the proposal.

It is no surprise that the majority of British doctors believe assisted dying should not be within routine medical practice but in specialised court settings. A recent survey of palliative care doctors showed that 82% opposed a change in the law.

As a GP I see many patients who are in their last days or weeks of life. Most, if not all, ask to be kept comfortable and symptom free. They ask for a natural death (without unnecessary interventions) and not to be resuscitated. I have never been asked by a patient to help them die.

Many terminally ill patients are under the care of palliative teams as well as their GP. This means that they are offered help to manage problematic symptoms such as pain, nausea, breathlessness or agitation. Patients and families can access support through their local hospice, and district or Marie Curie nurses. But end-of-life care is patchy across the country, with a need for greater investment to reduce health inequalities, particularly as more and more people with often complex sets of symptoms are dying at home.

The bill talks about patients who are expected to die within six months, but not others who are severely ill with prolonged debilitating conditions, and wish to die. However, not everyone who we would deem to have a poor quality of life wishes to die. I have seen patients who are paralysed, tube fed, catheterised and with no hope of recovery. Yet they still find their lives worth living.

There is the real possibility of coercion – whether implied or expressed – by friends, family and even health professionals when patients are seen to be a burden. Between 1998 and 2012, the US state of Oregon, which legalised it in 1997, witnessed a rise of more than 300% in assisted dying, and analysts reported that its health department was funding assisted suicide but not some cancer treatments. There have also been recorded cases of patients administering their prescribed lethal medications three years after being prescribed them. The vast majority of those questioned about their reasons for wanting assisted dying in Oregon talked of loss of autonomy, dignity and being a burden to others, and less of physical suffering.

But I can understand the argument for assisted dying, especially when I see people with dementia. I can (or I think I can) cope with physical frailty but it is the thought of losing one’s mind that troubles me most. Perhaps I, too, would want the independence to end my life at a time and circumstances of my choosing. But is dementia or another intractable condition even part of this assisted dying bill, which talks of capacity and death within fixed timeframes?

The proposed bill does not offer sufficient safeguarding for patients and doctors. Mental capacity can change depending on mood, physical distress or social hardship. There is always the risk that doctors will get it wrong. This risk of causing harm far outweighs any potential benefits.

Patients must have the trust and assurance that we are on their side. More thought needs to go into amending the bill further and looking at the practicalities of how assisted dying could be implemented, as there is no scope for this in routine medical practice. Assisted dying should not be the cheap alternative to high-quality palliative care.


Zara Aziz

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Assisted dying bill raises hopes and fears for end-of-life care | Letters
Letters: The debate should not be about what doctors/lawyers/baronesses ‘like’. The debate is about patients and what they think


10, Sep, 2015 @6:11 PM

Article image
At life's end: dying painlessly and peacefully is the goal of most
As the assisted dying bill goes to the Lords, doctors explain how most wish for palliative care, friendship and dignity at the end

Sarah Boseley, health editor

17, Jul, 2014 @7:02 PM

Article image
GPs need more clarity to make sure resources are available to tackle coronavirus | Zara Aziz
Measures need to be in place to help GPs cope if inundated by fearful patients or those presenting with the symptoms, says GP partner Zara Aziz

Zara Aziz

18, Feb, 2020 @12:00 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on assisted dying: a clash of moral visions | Editorial
Editorial: Assisted dying forces us to ask what life is for and why it’s valuable


10, Sep, 2015 @6:30 PM

Article image
Gender dysphoria patients deserve better treatment than I can give them | Zara Aziz
GPs don’t have the time or the expertise to provide the holistic treatment that transgender patients require. Proper services are required urgently

Zara Aziz

15, Aug, 2017 @11:00 AM

Article image
GPs need help now – our workload is unsafe | Zara Aziz
We’re not about to abandon visiting patients in care homes, but GPs can’t go on absorbing more work – that’s why a BMA conference voted to canvass members on a mass walkout

Zara Aziz

09, Feb, 2016 @1:00 PM

Article image
GPs need support to cut hospital referral rates

More district nurses, community matrons, midwives and social workers are required if GPs are to fill the gap between hospital and community settings

Zara Aziz

19, Jun, 2012 @1:30 PM

Article image
GPs and patients do better where practices have boundaries | Zara Aziz

Zara Aziz: Doctor's orders: A move to abolish practice boundaries could undermine care that relies on face-to-face contact and local access

Zara Aziz

14, Jan, 2014 @2:01 PM

Article image
The NHS does not need any more pointless change | Zara Aziz
Zara Aziz: Simon Stevens, chief of NHS England, says every permutation to restructure has been thought of over the years. Now it's time to listen to patients and staff, and leave well alone

Zara Aziz

10, Jun, 2014 @2:39 PM

Article image
The NHS no longer has the resources to care for our sick population | Zara Aziz
The government is in denial - the chronic underfunding of the health service is bad for patients and staff

Zara Aziz

17, Jan, 2017 @12:00 PM