Too many cancer patients delay going to doctor with symptoms

The worst are those with rectal bleeding and those living in deprived areas, research at King's College London reveals

One in five people who develop cancer symptoms delay going to see their GP for at least three months, according to new research which has renewed concern about the late diagnosis of cancer.

Experts said the number of people waiting three months was alarmingly high. Calls have been made for public education campaigns to be stepped up to tackle ignorance about what the signs of cancer are.

Among 2,371 cancer patients surveyed in a study published in the British Journal of Cancer, 35% waited at least three months before going to see their GP about bleeding from their anus, while 21% waited that long after experiencing unexplained weight loss, 17% after developing a lump and 9% after finding blood in their urine.

Patients with prostate cancer and rectal cancer were the most likely to delay going to see a doctor, while those with breast cancer were the least likely.

Dr Lindsay Forbes, the co-director of the King's College London early presentation group, which undertook the research, called for greater efforts to improve public recognition of the symptoms of cancer.

"Although a worrying number of patients across society are waiting too long to go to their doctor, those in the most deprived areas are the most likely to delay," Forbes said.

Cancer Research UK, which co-funded the study, said no one with a possible symptom should wait more than three months before seeing their GP.

Mark Flannagan, the chief executive of Beating Bowel Cancer, said: "Bowel cancer is extremely treatable if caught in the early stages: you have over a 90% chance of being successfully treated. However, this worrying lack of awareness of the symptoms means that too many people delay seeking help until it's too late."

Contributor

Denis Campbell, health correspondent

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
NHS cancer patients 'failing to be correctly monitored'
Concerns expressed that opportunities to save lives may be missed

Jessica Glenza in Chicago

01, Jun, 2018 @11:01 PM

Article image
Breath test to detect cancer may be possible, say scientists
Study reveals prototype device could identify disease and differentiate between its four most common forms

Sarah Boseley. health editor

10, Aug, 2010 @11:00 PM

Article image
'Holy grail of cancer research': doctors positive about early detection blood test
Blood tests called liquid biopsies show signs of finding cancers at an early stage

Jessica Glenza in New York

01, Jun, 2018 @6:33 AM

Early warning: Tom Nolan describes the cancer symptoms to look out for

Britain has one of Europe's worst cancer survival rates. Tom Nolan describes the symptoms to look out for

Tom Nolan

25, Nov, 2008 @12:01 AM

Article image
Aspirin a day could dramatically cut cancer risk, says biggest study yet

Daily pill for middle-aged could save 130,000 lives over 20 years in Britain alone, scientists suggest

Sarah Boseley, health editor

06, Aug, 2014 @8:08 AM

Article image
Cancer diagnoses in 40-59 age group soar 20% in a generation

Improved screening picks up cases that would have been missed, while unhealthy lifestyles also contribute to rise

Sarah Boseley, health editor

17, Jul, 2011 @11:01 PM

Article image
Patients deserve the truth: health screening can do more harm than good | Margaret McCartney

Margaret McCartney: The NHS fails to inform patients that health screening often leads to unnecessary and risky treatments

Margaret McCartney

03, Jan, 2014 @12:19 PM

Article image
UK still behind in cancer survival despite recent surge
Big improvement in past two decades fails to close gap with likes of Australia and Canada

Sarah Boseley Health editor

11, Sep, 2019 @8:30 PM

Article image
Cancer risk much greater among men
Male drinking and eating habits among reasons why they are 35% more likely to die from the disease than women

Denis Campbell, health correspondent

29, Jan, 2013 @12:01 AM

Faulty genes combine to increase family cancer risk

Scientists have found that a faulty gene can greatly increase the risk of breast and prostate cancer in families, suggesting targeted screening may be needed to pick up disease early.

James Meikle, health correspondent

28, Oct, 2005 @12:35 AM