Children half as likely as adults to get coronavirus, study says

Under-20s appear 56% less likely to contract Covid-19, preliminary evidence suggests

Children are about half as likely as adults to become infected with coronavirus, according to scientists who reviewed data gathered by contact tracing and population screening studies around the world.

The study, which will feed into the debate on when to open schools, found that children and young adults under the age of 20 appear 56% less likely to contract the virus than the over-20s, a finding that supports the idea that children are unlikely to play a major role in spreading the disease.

“It’s preliminary evidence, but the weight of evidence is clear that children appear to be less susceptible to Sars-Cov-2,” said Russell Viner, a professor of adolescent health at UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health and a senior author on the review.

“The balance of evidence is clearly that children are the safest group to be out in the community. They have the lowest prevalence of infections and the risk of death or severe infection from Covid-19 is exceptionally low in children,” he said.

“So for children themselves, the balance of risk is strongly in favour of a return to school given the very clear evidence of harm due to lockdown.”

Researchers assessed more than 6,000 recent papers on the pandemic, most of which – like the review itself - have not yet been peer reviewed or formally published in journals, and whittled them down to 18 that contained useful data on children’s susceptibility to the virus.

Nine of the papers examined in further detail were contact tracing studies that followed infections from person to person. Eight reported virus and antibody test data and one was a review of studies on household clusters of infections.

One of the studies found that in 31 household clusters of Covid-19, only three could be traced back to a child as the person who brought the infection into the home.

Another report from Australia undertook contact tracing of all Covid-19 cases in schools in New South Wales over a six-week period from early March. It found that 18 index cases, comprising nine students and nine staff, gave rise to only two further cases among students and none among teachers, though children were being pulled from the schools at the time and awareness of the infection was high.

While the UCL-led review suggests that children are more resilient to the infection, the pooled data were not sufficient to confirm whether children spread the infection more or less easily than adults.

“In times of uncertainty, what we need to do is mitigate risks,” Viner said. “I would concur very strongly that an effective test and trace mechanism in place is very important to mitigate the uncertainty about transmission from children.”

Rosalind Eggo, a co-author on the review and an infectious disease modeller in public health epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said the evidence suggested children and young people were at lower risk of infection than adults and “may therefore play a smaller role in the epidemic as a whole”.

She added: “This new evidence will help us better understand the possible effect of school reopening on transmission in schools and in the community.”

In a draft consultation published on Friday, a group of senior scientists warned that 1 June was too soon for schools to reopen safely and that more time was needed to set up an effective track and trace system to contain future outbreaks.

The Independent Sage committee, chaired by the former government chief scientist Sir David King, found the risk of children picking up the virus could be halved if they returned to school two weeks later than ministers were proposing. Delaying until September would reduce the risk still further, the report adds.

Contributor

Ian Sample Science editor

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
‘We haven’t finished the job’: JVT reflects on 18 months of Covid
Exclusive: Listen to the experts, says deputy chief medical officer Jonathan Van-Tam, not the celebrities

Nicola Davis Science correspondent

24, Sep, 2021 @10:32 AM

Article image
WHO halts hydroxychloroquine trial for coronavirus amid safety fears
Malaria drug taken by Trump could raise risk of death and heart problems, study shows

Staff and agencies

25, May, 2020 @5:30 PM

Article image
Coronavirus: a disease that thrives on human error
When it comes to containing the outbreak, small mistakes will have big consequences for our health

Peter Beaumont in London, Lorenzo Tondo in Palermo and Kim Willsher in Paris

07, Mar, 2020 @7:00 AM

Article image
Up to 100 UK children a week hospitalised with rare post-Covid disease
Exclusive: 75% of children worst affected by paediatric inflammatory multi-system syndrome are BAME

Denis Campbell and Caroline Bannock

05, Feb, 2021 @6:00 AM

Article image
K number: what is the coronavirus metric that could be crucial as lockdown eases?
The K value sheds light on how the transmission rate varies and can help identify clusters

Nicola Davis

01, Jun, 2020 @1:38 PM

Article image
China's Sars-like illness worries health experts
China’s viral pneumonia outbreak may have jumped species barrier, raising fears of pandemic

Sarah Boseley Health editor

09, Jan, 2020 @7:10 PM

Article image
Coronavirus: hospitals in West Midlands 'will be at capacity by next weekend'
Mayor says NEC field hospital will be ready to take patients as data shows 21% of deaths in England were in Midlands

Josh Halliday, Pamela Duncan and Caelainn Barr

03, Apr, 2020 @4:05 PM

Article image
Flurry of coronavirus reinfections leaves scientists puzzled
Though far from common, some patients developed worse symptoms the second time they became infected with Covid-19

Ian Sample Science editor

06, Oct, 2020 @12:37 PM

Article image
Coronavirus: April will be 'second dose month', says UK vaccines minister
Nadhim Zahawi hails milestone of 30m first doses and says UK still on track to protect all adults by July

Dan Sabbagh and Andrew Sparrow

28, Mar, 2021 @7:13 PM

Article image
People testing negative for Covid-19 despite exposure may have ‘immune memory’
Study says some individuals clear virus rapidly due to a strong immune response from existing T-cells, meaning tests record negative result

Hannah Devlin Science correspondent

10, Nov, 2021 @4:45 PM