Press bandwagon on antidepressants makes for depressing reading | Ben Goldacre

A cursory look at widely available research easily explains a rise in prescriptions. And no, it has nothing to do with the recession

This week some journalists have found a pattern in some data and ascribed a cause to it. "Recession linked to huge rise in antidepressants" said the Telegraph. "Economic woes fuel dramatic rise in use of antidepressants" said the Daily Mail. "Record numbers of people are being handed antidepressants" said the Express. Even the Guardian joined in , and it seems to have come from a BBC report.

The journalists are keen for you to know that these figures come from a freedom of information Act, which surprised me since each year – like you – I enjoy reading the Prescription Cost Analysis documents, which detail everything that has been prescribed over the previous year. The 2009 data were published in April 2010, so I guess the 2010 data had been due about now.

But are the numbers correct? Yes. From 2006 to 2010 there was a 43% increase in number of prescriptions for the SSRI class of antidepressants. Does that mean more people are depressed in the recession?

Well. Firstly, this rise in scripts for antidepressants isn't a new phenomenon. In 2009 the BMJ published a paper titled "Explaining the rise in antidepressant prescribing", which looks at the period from 1993 to 2005. In the five-year period from 2000 to 2005 – the boom before the bust these journalists are writing about – antidepressant prescribing also increased, by 36%. This isn't very different from 43%, so it feels unlikely that the present increase in prescriptions is due to the recession.

That's not the only problem here. It turns out that the number of prescriptions for an SSRI drug is a rubbish way of measuring how many people are being treated for depression: not just because people get prescribed SSRIs for all kinds of other things, like anxiety, PTSD, hot flushes, and more; and not just because doctors have moved away from older types of antidepressants, so would be prescribing more of the newer SSRI drugs even if the number of people with depression had stayed the same.

Excitingly, it's a bit more complicated than that. A 2006 paper from the British Journal of General Practice looked at prescribing and diagnosis rates in Scotland. Overall, again, the number of prescriptions for antidepressants increased from 1.5m in 1996 to 2.8m in 2001 (that is, it almost doubled).

But they also found a mystery: looking at the Scottish Health Survey they found no increase in the prevalence of depression; and looking at the GP consultations dataset, again they found no evidence that people were presenting more frequently to their GP with depression, or that GPs were making more diagnoses of depression.

So why were antidepressant prescriptions going up? This puzzle received some kind of explanation in 2009. The BMJ paper above found the same increase in the number of prescriptions that the journalists have found this week, as I said. But they had access to more data: their analysis didn't just look at the total number of prescriptions in the country, or even the total number of people diagnosed with depression: it also looked at the prescription records of individual patients, in a dataset of over 3 million patients' electronic health records (with 200,000 people who experienced a first diagnosis of depression during this period).

They found that the rise in the overall number of antidepressant prescriptions was not due to increasing numbers of patients receiving antidepressants. It was almost entirely caused by one thing: a small increase in the small proportion of those patients who received treatment for longer periods of time. Numerically, people receiving treatment for long periods make up the biggest chunk of all the prescriptions written, so this small shift bumped up the overall numbers hugely.

I don't know for certain if that phenomenon explains the increase in prescriptions from 2006-2010, as it does for the period 2000-2005 (although in the absence of work examining that question, since the increase in scripts was so similar, it does seem fairly likely). And I'm not expecting journalists to go to academic research databases to conduct large complex descriptive studies.

But if they are going to engage in primary research, and make dramatic causal claims to the nation – as they have done in this story – I don't think it's too much to ask that they familiarise themselves with proper work that's already been done, and consider alternative explanations for the numbers they've found.


Ben Goldacre

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Young people are being prescribed dangerous antidepressants | Letters
Letters: Readers give their views on the strong medications being given to children and young people


25, Nov, 2018 @4:44 PM

Article image
Medicalisation of misery to blame for soaring use of antidepressants, say GPs

Doctors across Europe warn limited time and resources leads many to prescribe pills for less-urgent cases of depression

Mark Rice-Oxley and Carmen Fishwick

21, Nov, 2013 @7:00 AM

Article image
Antidepressants prescribed far more in deprived English coastal towns
Rate in Blackpool, Sunderland and East Lindsey almost twice the national average, analysis of NHS prescription data shows

Damien Gayle

14, Apr, 2017 @3:24 PM

Feeling low? Don't blame it on Blue Monday | Ben Goldacre

Ben Goldacre: Despite hype around the 'most depressing day in the year' there is no reason to believe people are more miserable in January

Ben Goldacre

22, Jan, 2011 @7:00 AM

Article image
NHS leaflet mixes past and present | Ben Goldacre

Ben Goldacre: The government is using old statistics to make misleading claims about the need for change

Ben Goldacre

16, Apr, 2011 @7:00 AM

Article image
Children under 10 among those given strong antidepressants in UK
Guidance warns against prescribing paroxetine and venlafaxine due to risk of suicide

Sarah Marsh and Patrick Greenfield

21, Nov, 2018 @6:00 AM

Article image
Antidepressants are better than placebos | Letters
Letters: A retired psychiatrist says the drugs helped her without any side effects, while Richard Bartley highlights a study that shows they are significantly better than placebos


08, Apr, 2019 @5:01 PM

Article image
NHS prescribed record number of antidepressants last year
Data prompts debate about whether rise shows drugs are handed out too freely or whether more people are getting help

Denis Campbell Health policy editor

29, Jun, 2017 @6:06 PM

Article image
Access to GPs’ patient data key to new treatments, researchers say
Group of scientists contest privacy concerns that they say are hampering research into illnesses such as long Covid

Sarah Boseley

09, Jun, 2021 @11:01 PM

Article image
NHS mental health care in crisis: 'There is no hope for people like me'
More than 600 readers answered the Guardian's request for stories – and what they depict is a profoundly broken system

Alexandra Topping

08, Oct, 2014 @6:04 PM