George Osborne's reassuring words fail to comfort the markets | Nils Pratley

With a lame-duck chancellor and Boris Johnson in the land of make-believe, the financial positives are few and far between

Stay calm, said the chancellor. Markets paused for half an hour and then resumed their falls. George Osborne cannot be surprised. He spent the referendum warning of the hell and damnation that would befall the British people if they voted for Brexit. Words of reassurance are not credible from the mouth of an author of Project Fear.

Lord King, a former governor of the Bank of England, was right to say yesterday that Osborne’s threat to launch an emergency budget, raising income tax and slashing spending, was a low point of a referendum campaign that was dispiriting on both sides.

Indeed, Osborne’s idea of punishing the voters surely contributed to remain’s failure. His plans would not have passed parliament and, in any case, tax rises and spending cuts would be no way to fight the threat of recession. Voters knew as much instinctively. If a few waverers decided “up yours” was a suitable response, it was predictable. So was Osborne’s immediate retreat yesterday from the idea of launching an emergency budget. He is a lame-duck chancellor.

But, in the land of Westminster make-believe, Boris Johnson’s early morning pronouncement that “the pound is stable, the markets are stable” takes some beating. The man who could be prime minister within a few months was wrong on both counts. The pound fell another 3% against the dollar on Monday to $1.32, after Friday’s 8% plunge, and the share prices of UK banks were battered again. If you want the market’s view of consumer confidence in the UK, try that traditional bellwether, Marks & Spencer – down 20% since the referendum. Nobody could sensibly describe the position as stable.

In fact, the only reason why the FTSE 100 index looks remotely calm – down “only” 2.5% yesterday – is that it is stuffed with multinationals that make most of their money in dollars, which suddenly buy many more pounds, the currency in which FTSE 100 share prices are quoted. The big winners from Brexit, in terms of sterling share prices, have been Shell, BP, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Unilever, Diageo and so on. It’s just a currency effect.

A trader points to a Bloomberg terminal showing the FTSE 100 index
A trader from ETX Capital points to a Bloomberg terminal showing the FTSE 100 index following George Osborne’s speech. Photograph: Daniel Leal-Olivas/AFP/Getty Images

Among companies whose profits and prospects rest on the UK economy, the tale is different. Most of the big housebuilders – Taylor Wimpey, Persimmon, Barratt – have fallen about 40% since Friday. Investors are alarmed by the possibility of falling house prices, a shortage of building workers from the EU and cancelled housing projects.

In the world of banking, Royal Bank of Scotland, down 25% at one point on Monday, has lost a third of its value since the referendum. Taxpayers’ 73% stake is worth £6.5bn less than it was last Thursday. If Scotland eventually separates from the rest of the UK, the carve-up of RBS will be messy and expensive.

The only asset class in which Johnson could almost point to stability is the gilt market. Investors are running towards UK government debt, not away from it. Yields on 10-year government debt have fallen from 1.3% to 0.95%. That, at least, is the “right” direction in the sense that the government can borrow more cheaply. Again, though, you have to scratch the surface. Osborne’s bogus threats have been exposed and the Bank of England will be doing all the recession-fighting in the form of lower-for-longer interest rates.

Scratching around for positives, King said sterling at $1.50 – the level of the eve of the referendum – was too high for the UK’s good anyway. He is right. The UK’s current account deficit hit a peacetime record of 5.2% in 2015, which is a dangerous level that could not be sustained indefinitely. A lower exchange rate, boosting exports and dampening imports, offers the most credible cure. If the cost is some upward pressure on inflation, there’s no better time than now to take the medicine. Foreign investors, if they could see the ingredients of post-Brexit recovery, would quickly return and the Bank of England would have greater room for manoeuvre on monetary policy.

That sketch of a recovery, however, requires competence in government. At the moment, we have remainers whose authority is exploded and leavers who, apparently, didn’t bother to think about what they would say if they won. If a lower pound offers opportunities, investors want to know the government is capable of seizing it. If not, there’s every chance they’ll keep selling.

Waking up to BHS and HBOS

What fun, another BHS inquiry. This time it’s the auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers, which will be investigated, by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC), in relation to the department store retailer’s accounts in the last full year of Sir Philip Green’s ownership.

For good measure the FRC – previously seen by many as a sleepy policeman – will examine KPMG’s audit of HBOS in 2007, the year before the bank hit the rocks. That accident may feel like ancient history, but better late than never. As Andrew Tyrie, the chair of the Treasury select committee, said, the official HBOS report exposed the “staggeringly poor quality” of some of the bank’s loans. And, if tardiness over HBOS has encouraged greater urgency at the FRC in cases like BHS, so much the better.

Contributor

Nils Pratley

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Split RBS into a good and bad bank? The idea needs proper examination
Analysis is overdue – the current situation smells suspiciously like a government-sponsored attempt to kill discussion at birth

Nils Pratley

04, Jun, 2013 @10:00 PM

Article image
No-deal Brexit: markets brace for big hit to UK company shares and sterling
Analysts warn if talks end on Sunday without agreement it could trigger a large sell-off

Richard Partington

11, Dec, 2020 @6:13 PM

Article image
RBS sell warning spells trouble for George Osborne's budget
Chancellor could be announcing missed borrowing target and postponement of feel-good Lloyds retail offer in March

Nils Pratley

12, Jan, 2016 @8:05 PM

Article image
George Osborne's shift on bad bank model is welcome
Chancellor says good bank/bad bank split will be examined in detail following advice from the Banking Commission

Nils Pratley

19, Jun, 2013 @7:46 PM

Article image
High cost of more delay forced TSB to upgrade before it was ready | Nils Pratley
Using former owner Lloyds’ IT system was proving ruinously expensive for the bank

Nils Pratley

24, Apr, 2018 @6:03 PM

Article image
So just when, exactly, will the City press the no-deal panic button? | Nils Pratley
Given the ever-ticking Brexit clock, the air of complacency in the markets is extraordinary

Nils Pratley

30, Jan, 2019 @8:00 PM

Article image
Ross McEwan on Brexit: it's not a banking crisis – RBS has plenty of money
Chief executive of bailed-out bank is optimistic after referendum result – but, despite an overhaul, profits remain elusive

Jill Treanor

17, Jul, 2016 @4:12 PM

Article image
Bank's olive branch increases chance of Brexit deal City can live with
Bank of England casts itself as model of reasonableness in allowing EU banks to continue operating in UK

Nils Pratley

20, Dec, 2017 @7:43 PM

Article image
George Osborne's flashy giveaway of Lloyds shares
Treasury’s plans to offload shares in Lloyds Banking Group has seen state’s stake fall – but Osborne’s speedier scheme will see the government lose out

Nils Pratley

12, May, 2015 @11:26 PM

Article image
Bank of England calls for clear heads to avoid no-deal mayhem | Nils Pratley
EU will be big loser if agreement not reached for UK clearers to handle £69tn derivatives market

Nils Pratley

09, Oct, 2018 @6:24 PM