PMQs and MPs debate EU withdrawal bill – as it happened

Last modified: 10: 59 PM GMT+0

Rolling coverage of the day’s political developments as they happen, including Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn at PMQs and MPs debating the EU withdrawal bill

Evening summary

  • The government has seen off a number of amendments to the EU Withdrawal Bill on the post- Brexit protection of rights and environmental regulations.
  • Labour MP Ivan Lewis has been put under formal investigation following a complaint about his conduct, but the former minister has not been suspended by the party.
  • Priti Patel has used her first speech in the Commons since she resigned as international development secretary to urge the government to ignore MPs who are sceptical about Brexit.
  • Manfred Weber, a key ally of Angela Merkel’s, has said that the UK must “clarify” what it will pay the EU when it leaves if it wants Brussels to open trade talks after December. Weber, a German MEP who leads the centre-right European People’s party (EPP) group in the European parliament, was speaking after he met Theresa May in Downing Street. He said:

When somebody is leaving the club then such a person or such a member state has to pay the open bill. That is what we are asking for - simply fairness, simply to do what you promised to do.

For the so-called sufficient progress question for the December council, the most important thing is not the figure. The most important thing is to clarify the commitments - the areas where Great Britain has to see its commitments.

Downing Street said May’s talks with Weber had been “constructive”.

  • The Conservative MP Anna Soubry has told MPs that she has received threats which she has reported to the police after being labelled a “Brexit mutineer” with other pro-European Tory colleagues in a Daily Telegraph splash. (See 1.59am.)

That is all from us tonight.

Have a peaceful evening.

MPs reject amendment 70 at committee stage

Another win for the government. The amendment sought to incorporate the principles of the Good Friday Agreement in the EU withdrawal bill. 313 against, 48 in favour.

That’s the end of the voting tonight.

MPs reject Labour environment amendment

The house has rejected Labour’s new clause 67 with a majority of 16, which aimed to ensure that environmental principles of EU law remain part of UK law after Brexit. 297 in favour, 313 against.

MPs are now voting on amendment 70.

Results are coming thick and fast now.

MPs reject Green amendment on animals as sentient beings

The House of Commons has rejected Caroline Lucas’s new clause 30 with an 18 majority for the government. 313 against, 295 in favour.

The chamber is now voting on Labour’s new clause 67, which would ensure that environmental principles of EU law remain part of UK law after Brexit. It applies to the principles in article 191 of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union.

Updated

While we wait on the result of the vote, here’s some more news from parliament.

This evening, it emerged Labour MP Ivan Lewis is under formal investigation following a complaint about his conduct, but the former minister has not been suspended by the party.

Read more here:

Action in the chamber.

MPs voting on Green Caroline Lucas' new clause which would write the recognition of animals as sentient beings into domestic law

— Esther Webber (@estwebber) November 15, 2017

New clause 30 would transfer the EU Protocol on animal sentience set into UK law, so that animals continue to be recognised as sentient beings under UK law.

Shadow chancellor John McDonnell is calling on Philip Hammond to end seven years of austerity with an “emergency Budget” for public services, the Associate Press reports.

Mr McDonnell will say the chancellor needs to set out a “genuine and decisive change of course” when he lays out his Budget plans in the Commons next week.

In a speech setting out Labour’s fiscal priorities, he will call on the government to lift the public sector pay cap, “properly” fund public services - including health and education - and “pause and fix” universal credit.

He will also urge ministers to embark on a large-scale public house-building programme as well as providing additional investment for infrastructure across the whole country.

Mr McDonnell is expected to say:

In his first year as chancellor, Philip Hammond has demonstrated that he completely fails to understand how working people are struggling after seven years of Tory austerity.

Next week the country needs an ‘emergency budget’ for our public services that are in crisis, not a budget desperately designed to save the jobs of a weak prime minister and her embattled chancellor.

There has to be a genuine and decisive change of course.

The government is not expected to lose tonight, but there is interest in the voting as it will reveal if some Tories are voting with the opposition.

As the Independent’s John Rentoul notes, it’s tight.

Government majority dropping in EU Withdrawal Bill votes: 20, 20, 21 yesterday and 16, 12 so far this evening.

— John Rentoul (@JohnRentoul) November 15, 2017

MPs are still debating EU withdrawal bill amendments, but we are expecting a vote shortly.

So far, the government has seen off the attempts to amend key Brexit legislation despite tighter votes and fresh Tory angst.

Away from Brexit, British politicians are continuing to react to Australia’s historic vote for same-sex marriage equality.

I am delighted that Australians have voted for #MarriageEquality, a great victory for equality and human rights. I hope the Australian Parliament will make it law.

— Jeremy Corbyn (@jeremycorbyn) November 15, 2017

Great to see Australia vote overwhelmingly in favour of #marriageequality Everyone should be free to express their love in the way that they choose

— Boris Johnson (@BorisJohnson) November 15, 2017

I’m incredibly proud of legalising Same Sex Marriage in the UK & delighted that other countries are looking to do the same. G’day Australia! https://t.co/Beg9poCc1T

— David Cameron (@David_Cameron) November 15, 2017

Strong support for Caroline Lucas’s amendment.

Delighted to get strong support on New Clause 30 from @MaryCreaghMP @timfarron @LSRPlaid @DavidEDrew & @GeraintDaviesMP, and hopeful of positive response from the Minister #EUWithdrawalBill pic.twitter.com/h6Zz89lXdI

— Caroline Lucas (@CarolineLucas) November 15, 2017

The chamber has now moved on to an amendment which aims to keep existing environmental principles from A191 of Treaty on Functioning of the EU put forward by Matthew Pennycook, the shadow Brexit minister.

It’s all getting a bit cosy in the chamber as MPs continue to discuss Caroline Lucas’s new clause 30...

Caroline Lucas: “We’re delighted with the Secretary of State (@michaelgove) But how do we know he’ll be here for long enough?” A remarkable intervention, and shows how much credit Michael has earned.

— Zac Goldsmith (@ZacGoldsmith) November 15, 2017

Labour amendment rejected by 12 votes

The closest vote so far, but it’s another tight win for the government.

MPs have voted against discussing Labour’s new clause 58, which would have ensured that rights derived from EU law covering employment rights, environmental protection, standards of equalities, health and safety standards and consumer standards get enhanced protection after Brexit.

Closest vote yet - Opposition amendment on emp rights defeated by 12 votes 299-311 -majority shrinking by 4 per division - seems more rebels

— Faisal Islam (@faisalislam) November 15, 2017

The chamber is now debating Caroline Lucas’s new clause 30, which would transfer the EU Protocol on animal sentience set into UK law, so that animals continue to be recognised as sentient beings under UK law.

Updated

Parliamentary scrutiny amendment rejected

MPs have voted against discussing new clause 25 with a majority of just 16.

Some Labour reaction:

Government majority cut to just 16 in last Commons #Brexit vote - things getting tighter for them as flaws in their Bill exposed.

— Stephen Doughty (@SDoughtyMP) November 15, 2017

The chamber will now vote on whether to debate Labour’s new clause 58, which would ensure that rights derived from EU law covering employment rights, environmental protection, standards of equalities, health and safety standards and consumer standards get enhanced protection after Brexit. It would do that by saying they could only be changed by primary legislation, or legislation under this bill.

Updated

The EU withdrawal bill debate has paused while MPs vote on whether to debate new clause 25 (NC25). The debate should restart in a few minutes.

Kerry McCarthy’s NC25 would establish a mechanism by which ministers could change some aspects of EU law being incorporated into UK law outside the time limits in the bill, subject to enhanced scrutiny.

More from our Brexit policy editor, Dan Roberts, on today’s meeting between Theresa May and Manfred Weber, a key ally of Angela Merkel:

European parliament leader @ManfredWeber tells reporters he heard "positive messages" from prime minister that give him hope for a Brexit breakthrough before the December council meeting: "I am more optimistic. There is progress and the will to see progress."

— Dan Roberts (@RobertsDan) November 15, 2017

Philip Hammond will use next week’s budget to offer young people the chance to get on the property ladder, the Press Association reports.

The chancellor said addressing the cost of property was a “very complex challenge” but he wanted the next generation to have the same opportunities as older Britons to own property.

Speaking before the November 22 budget, Mr Hammond said:

The prime minister made clear at the party conference that she regards dealing with the challenges in the housing market as a key thing that she is going to focus on in the coming years.

In the budget, I will set out how we intend to take that plan forward.

There is no silver bullet, there isn’t a single thing that solves the challenge of affordability in the housing market - we are a crowded island and this is a very complex challenge.

But we have done a lot of work on this and next week we will start to set out our plan for addressing the housing challenges in this country, making sure that the next generation has the same opportunities as their parents did for home ownership and the accumulation of personal wealth through assets.

Earlier today, thousands of students marched in London to demand education reform ahead of next week’s budget. Here are the photos from today’s protest:

Afternoon summary

  • Priti Patel has used her first speech in the Commons since she resigned as international development secretary to urge the government to ignore MPs who are sceptical about Brexit. Speaking in the debate on the EU withdrawal bill, she said:

There are members tabling amendments, and rightly so. But I don’t think we should listen to, really, those that simply do not have the confidence in this House, in our democracy and also in our country going forward, along with the suggestions that we are incapable of governing ourselves. Fundamentally, we should be rejecting that.

Patel also said she was inspired by Thatcher and Churchill as she started her speech with a joke about the circumstances of her resignation last week (when she flew back to London from Kenya to be effectively sacked, with people tracking her flight.) She told MPs:

Of course I am speaking today in this debate following an intensive course over the past week, I think it’s fair to say, on how to stage an exit which was the focus of a degree of international attention.

So for anyone who is still tracking my movements, it’s fair to say that I can confirm that as I walked into the chamber this afternoon I passed statues and portraits commemorating some of our greatest statesmen including Margaret Thatcher and Winston Churchill, statesmen who stood up and defended democracy, freedom and sovereignty of our great nation.

The debate, the bill’s second day in committee, will run until about 10pm when MPs will vote on a series of amendments. (See 2.04pm.)

  • Manfred Weber, a key ally of Angela Merkel’s, has said that the UK must “clarify” what it will pay the EU when it leaves if it wants Brussels to open trade talks after December. Weber, a German MEP who leads the centre-right European People’s party (EPP) group in the European parliament, was speaking after he met Theresa May in Downing Street. He said:

When somebody is leaving the club then such a person or such a member state has to pay the open bill. That is what we are asking for - simply fairness, simply to do what you promised to do.

For the so-called sufficient progress question for the December council, the most important thing is not the figure. The most important thing is to clarify the commitments - the areas where Great Britain has to see its commitments.

Downing Street said May’s talks with Weber had been “constructive”.

  • The Conservative MP Anna Soubry has told MPs that she has received threats which she has reported to the police after being labelled a “Brexit mutineer” with other pro-European Tory colleagues in a Daily Telegraph splash. (See 1.59am.)

That is all from me for today.

My colleague Patrick Greenfield is now taking over.

Updated

At PMQs Jeremy Corbyn raised the case of a lettings agency in Lincolnshire that has issued pre-emptive eviction notices to tenants because universal credit is being rolled out in the area. That means tenants will be evicted if they cannot pay their rent. The agency, GAP Property, said it was taking this action as a precaution because experience suggested the UC rollout would lead to some tenants falling into arrears.

My colleague Jessica Elgot has written up Corbyn’s revelation here.

At HuffPost Paul Waugh has spoken to the GAP Property director, Guy Piggott, and he has said he is glad Corbyn raised the case at PMQs. Piggott told HuffPost universal credit needed to be reformed. He said:

It seemed like Theresa May was saying it’s alright, don’t worry. That’s just not good enough in a town like Grimsby. It’s so poor here, the average wage is about £17,000.

My message to Theresa May is this: ‘You’ve got to sort it out. Consider what it does to a family living hand to mouth. Imagine if you’ve got no savings, if all of your money stops and from the middle of December your next pay is February, what would you do about feeding yourself, keeping your house warm?’

It’s great Jeremy Corbyn has raised it, he’s done the right thing in alerting people. I agree the welfare state needs to be reformed but you have to do it in a more sensitive way. Nobody’s given any thought into how this affects the most vulnerable.

According to the Evening Standard’s Joe Murphy, the number of Tory MPs who might vote against the government’s plan to fix 29 March 2019 as the Brexit date in the EU withdrawal bill has risen to 21.

Up to 21 Tory rebels now against Mrs May's "Brexit Day law".
And two ministers have indicated they could resign next autumn if exit deal is bad for UK https://t.co/kSBv1wwAbt

— Joe Murphy (@JoeMurphyLondon) November 15, 2017

Car manufacturers need to know by March if UK vehicle certification will still be accepted in the EU after Brexit, a senior vice president of Honda has warned. As the Press Association reports, with the UK set to leave the bloc in March 2019, Ian Howells told MPs on the Treasury committee it would take around nine to 12 months to set up type-approval in another country. March 2018 is “the sort of time-frame we would be talking about” for getting clarity on the issue, he said.

Cars built in the UK are tested by the vehicle certification agency (VCA), whose approval is accepted across the EU, but manufacturers have warned this will no longer be the case if Brexit happens without an agreement. Howells warned that such a scenario would mean Honda could not export cars built at its Swindon factory to the EU without obtaining type-approval from elsewhere.

If you don’t have type-approval you can’t sell. It’s as simple as that. It is structurally a very important thing for us to have.

He also told the committee that delays at customs following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU could lead to the firm having to change its policy of relying on components being delivered only when they are about to be required.

Are there things we have to rethink, particularly around how we manage our supply chain flow and how our manufacturing operations work from a just-in-time point of view? Quite clearly the contingency that we are looking at would be that we would have to increase the amount of inventory that we hold on the UK mainland as opposed to importing it on a more regular basis. That impacts our productivity and efficiency.

We’d like to see certainty very quickly.

Patel says, when the UK leaves the EU, it can reduce regulations that add costs.

But in some areas will be able to go further, she says.

She says the UK is a proud country with a great democratic history. This is one of the best parliaments in the world, she says.

Patel urges government to ignore people who do not have confidence in Brexit

Patel says the government should not listen to people who do not have confidence in going forward, or who think the UK cannot govern itself.

She says there are people on the Labour benches who think the UK cannot govern itself.

  • Patel urges government to ignore people who do not have confidence in Brexit.

The Conservative MP James Cleverly asks Patel if she agrees that the suggestion that the UK can only function properly under supervision from the EU is a “massive insult” to the British people.

Patel agrees. She says the UK does not need Brussels.

Priti Patel making first speech from the backbenches in Withdrawal Bill debate. Says she speaks after "an intensive course on how to stage an exit"

— Henry Zeffman (@hzeffman) November 15, 2017

Priti Patel speaks in EU withdrawal bill debate

Priti Patel, the former international development secretary, is speaking in the debate now. It is her first Commons speech since she resigned last week.

She starts by joking about anyone who might have been tracking her movements. If they did, they will have seen that she walked past statues of Churchill and Thatcher before she came into the chamber - great statesmen who stood up for this country.

UK children's commissioners call for rollout of universal credit to be halted

The UK’s children’s commissioners have called for a halt in the rollout of universal credit for families with children. In a pre-budget letter to the chancellor, they said a pause was essential to fix problems with the way the benefit is working. Otherwise hundreds of thousands more children could be pushed into poverty, they said.

The commissioners for England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland said:

It has become clear that the absence of income for a number of weeks while universal credit payments are authorised and implemented presents an almost impossible challenge to the ability of families to provide basics such as food and heating to themselves and their children.

In our view, amelioration measures must be put in place before there is further rollout of universal credit.

We believe that these steps are essential to prevent hundreds of thousands more children experiencing poverty and the consequential impact on their future life chances.

They called for the restriction of UC benefits to only two children to be reconsidered, saying it constituted a breach of children’s rights to an adequate standard of living under the UN convention of the rights of the child.

Some ministers 'not excessively fond of workers' rights', says Ken Clarke

In the Commons Robert Buckland, the solicitor general, is still speaking in the EU withdrawal bill debate.

Ken Clarke, the Conservative pro-European and former chancellor, asked why, if the government had no intention of using Brexit to undermine workers’ rights, ministers were not willing to accept amendments making that explicit. He said:

It sounds as though [Buckland] is about to reassure us is that the policy of the present government is that, although it is taking these powers, there is no intention of using them for any of these purposes [undermining rights]. The Theresa May government, I quite accept, is not about to use draconian powers to lower standards. The prime minister’s instincts are quite the other way.

As these powers are not needed, as we don’t need legislation to use powers that no one wants to use, why can’t we put it beyond doubt that this is not going to be intended. Heaven forfend my party should swing to the right at any time in its long and distinguished history. There are members of the present government who are not excessively fond of lizards and bats and/or workers’ rights, and we could be all reassured if he will undertake to put on the face of the bill reduced formal powers.

Buckland replied by saying he thought it was “safer and wiser” to have a bill that did not contain “loopholes” that could cause problems in the future.

Thousands of students are marching through the streets of central London this afternoon, as pressure mounts on the government to reform education policies, ahead of next week’s budget.

The demonstration, endorsed by Labour, began peacefully, apart from one incident with a rival demonstrator. In a pre-recorded video message encouraging students to attend the demonstration, Jeremy Corbyn said:

The political establishment has betrayed young people. Since 2010, the Tories have made unprecedented cuts to further education. They’ve taken away bursaries for nurses and they’ve abolished grants for the poorest students.

Now the Tories think that capping university fees at £9,250 will be some sort of remedy to all this. What an insult. Everyone should access to free education, from the cradle to the grave, without being forced into debt and anxiety.

Organisers claim around 10,000 students are attending the demonstration, which is not being endorsed by the National Union of Students, but the actual number could be far lower.

In a noisy atmosphere complete with samba band and cheeky placards, students have been chanting: “education for the masses, not just for the ruling classes” and “no ifs, no buts, no education cuts”.

The #FreeEdNow march is now underway, with thousands of students marching from Malet Street to Parliament. pic.twitter.com/9z1Nip2PwU

— Harrison Jones (@HarrisonJones7) November 15, 2017

Flares set off at a very noisy #FreeEdNOW demonstration, where protesters are chanting: "education for the masses, not just for the ruling classes" and "no ifs, no buts, no education cuts". pic.twitter.com/IcH3cNPwLT

— Harrison Jones (@HarrisonJones7) November 15, 2017

Robert Buckland, the solicitor general, is speaking for the government in the EU withdrawal bill debate now. He says he wants to stress that “in now way whatsoever” will the Brexit process to be used to undermine rights.

He says many of the amendments being debated today, that are intended to introduce safeguards in this respect, are unnecessary.

Dominic Grieve, the Conservative former attorney general, has just finished speaking in the EU withdrawal bill debate now. He said that he accepted the concerns about the potential for rights derived from EU law being watered down at some point in the future because the safeguards in this bill were insufficient. But he said he would like to work with ministers on how this problem could be addressed.

He said he found yesterday’s exchanges “hugely instructive”. MPs had a “cogent and sensible debate” and there were signs that MPs from different sides of the House might be able to reach a “degree of consensus”, he said.

The Times columnist Rachel Sylvester says the Telegraph “mutineers” front page may inadvertently be flagging up an alternative, and rather better, cabinet.

A better cabinet than the current one. Foreign sec - tugenhat, Chancellor - KC, lord chancellor - grieve, home sec - soubry. Welfare - Heidi Allen, Leader - nicky m? https://t.co/lyThizDcfo

— Rachel Sylvester (@RSylvesterTimes) November 15, 2017

Bercow says attempts to intimidate MPs will fail

This is what John Bercow, the Commons speaker, said in response to Anna Soubry when she told him a few minutes ago that she had received threats following the Daily Telegraph “Brexit mutineers” splash. (See 1.59pm.) He told MPs:

I’m extremely concerned to hear what [Soubry] has just told me. She should not be subject to threats and neither should any other member of this House, or indeed any person for holding and expressing a political opinion.

Thankfully we do have a free press - imperfect, deeply flawed, like all of us. They don’t always realise it; they realise everybody else’s flaws, but very rarely their own. Our media are deeply flawed. But, nevertheless, they are free and that is a good thing. And none of use would seek to deny the merits, indeed the indispensability, in a free society of a free press.

Equally, however, members of this House are free and duty-bound to do what they think is right. I hope [Soubry] won’t take it a amiss if I say not only is any attempt to threaten or intimidate her, or any colleague, repugnant. It is also doomed to fail. I know her and I know my colleagues well enough to know that even if there are people who think they can intimidate, even if, hypothetically, there were someone in the media who thought he or she could intimidate, that person would be grossly mistaken. Members will not be intimidated and they never should be.

Matthew Pennycook, a shadow Brexit minister, is opening the EU withdrawal bill debate.

He says amendments like Labour’s NC58 (see 2.04pm) are designed to ensure that rights that people have from EU law, which are meant to be protected under the bill, don’t get “chipped away” in the future.

Here is the letter sent out by a lettings agency that Jeremy Corbyn mentioned at PMQs. (See 12.11pm.)

letter Corbyn brandished during PMQs Grimsby letting agents issuing a "notice seeking possession" because of 6 week universal credit gap pic.twitter.com/ZrdtJn3vCS

— Faisal Islam (@faisalislam) November 15, 2017

MPs resume debate on EU withdrawal bill

MPs are now starting day two of the committee stage debate on the EU withdrawal bill.

The debate will run for eight hours, and it looks as if all the votes will come right at the end.

They are debating amendments relating to clauses 2, 3 and 4 of the bill, dealing with the retention of existing EU law and covering issues like workers’ rights, the environment and animal sentience.

You can find all the paperwork related to the bill and the amendments here.

Here are the some of the key amendments being debated, including ones that may be put to a vote.

Labour’s new clause 2 (NC2): This would stop Henry VIII powers in other acts of parliament from being used to water down EU rights relating to workplace protections, equality provisions, health and safety regulations or fundamental rights.

Chris Leslie’s new clause 15 (NC15): This will ensure that ministers have to report to parliament when the EU makes changes after Brexit that would have changed UK law if the UK had remained in the EU.

Kerry McCarthy’s new clause 25 (NC25): This would establish a mechanism by which ministers could change some aspects of EU law being incorporated into UK law outside the time limits in the bill, subject to enhanced scrutiny.

Labour’s new clause 58 (NC58): This would ensure that rights derived from EU law covering employment rights, environmental protection, standards of equalities, health and safety standards and consumer standards get enhanced protection after Brexit. It would do that by saying they could only be changed by primary legislation, or legislation under this bill.

Caroline Lucas’s new clause 30 (NC30): This would transfer the EU Protocol on animal sentience set into UK law, so that animals continue to be recognised as sentient beings under UK law.

Mary Creagh’s new clause 60 (NC60): This would ensure that the environmental principles of EU law remain part of UK law after Brexit.

Labour’s new clause 67 (NC67): Like NC60, this would ensure that environmental principles of EU law remain part of UK law after Brexit. It applies to the principles in article 191 of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union.

Updated

Tory MP says Telegraph 'Brexit mutineer' splash led to her receiving threats

This is what the Conservative MP Anna Soubry said when she raised her point of order a few moments ago.

According to my office, they have just reported about five, if not more, tweets to the police issuing threats against myself following the front page article on today’s Daily Telegraph. Would you therefore, Mr Speaker, make it very clear to everybody, in whatever capacity, that they have an absolute duty to report responsibly and make sure they use language that brings our country together and makes sure that we have a democracy that welcomes free speech and an attitude of tolerance.

Here is the Telegraph front page.

Tomorrow's Daily Telegraph front page: The Brexit mutineers #TomorrowsPapersToday pic.twitter.com/ZeYzWT2Mfy

— The Telegraph (@Telegraph) November 14, 2017

Updated

In the Commons the Conservative MP Anna Soubry says her office has had to report threatening tweets to the police that were made after the Daily Telegraph included her in its list of “Brexit mutineers”.

John Bercow, the Commons speaker, says threats should not be made against any MP. He says the press in this country is flawed, but it is also free, and that is how it should be.

He says any threats to someone like Soubry are “repugnant”. But there are also “doomed to fail”, he says.

Updated

Thousands of British nationals living in Zimbabwe must be given “all the assistance that they need” following a military takeover in Harare, Labour has said. In an urgent question in the Commons, the shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry described the situation as “highly volatile” and urged the government to do all it could during a “dangerous period”. Boris Johnson, the foreign secretary, said there had been no reports of “any injuries or suffering” involving the 20,000 British nationals in Zimbabwe.

Ratcliffe says Boris Johnson has 'reservations' about granting Nazanin diplomatic protection

The husband of jailed British mother Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe has described his hour-long meeting with foreign secretary Boris Johnson as “positive and constructive”, the Press Association reports. Richard Ratcliffe said Johnson has no fixed date for his planned visit to Iran, but the Foreign Secretary was “keen” for him to travel with him.

Ratcliffe said he had pressed Johnson to give diplomatic protection to his wife. Johnson did not rule out the idea, but he did express reservations. Ratcliffe said:

We talked, of course, about the point of diplomatic protection ... and it’s different from diplomatic immunity.

Diplomatic protection is in essence when a state like Britain decides that Nazanin was being treated badly because she is British and she is entitled to be protected as an extension of the British state. It is not unprecedented, but it is a big step.

I said I thought it would be important and helpful. The foreign secretary and the Foreign Office expressed reservations, and we agreed that there are some questions that we have sent from the lawyers.

They have agreed to answer the questions and then for the lawyers to sit down and talk it through. Both legally and then also practically. But certainly, I think it is an important thing for us to be pushing for.

Asked what reservations Mr Johnson had expressed about granting diplomatic protection status, Ratcliffe said:

He didn’t personally give a long list of objections. He asked how it would help, in a nutshell. What did we think doing it would make different from what we are doing currently?

I said, ‘I’m not a lawyer, I think it would help, I think it would send an important signal that the way Nazanin is being treated is unacceptable’.

I appreciate it’s an escalation, but I think ... it’s important that where softly-softly doesn’t work, where it has been escalated by the past couple of weeks’ events and the foreign secretary’s words being used, I think it is appropriate. We agreed to keep talking about it.

As usual, I overlooked the questions from Ian Blackford, the SNP leader at Westminster, because I was writing the snap verdict. So here it is.

Blackford started by asking May if she agreed that public servants in the emergency services were doing a good job. She agreed. So why are the Scottish fire and police forces the only ones in the UK paying VAT, he asked. He urged her to scrap it. May replied:

The chief secretary has made clear that officials in HMT will look at this issue ... Very constructive representations have been made by my Scottish colleagues on this particular issue.

Let’s just be clear, before the Scottish government made the decision to make Scotland’s police and fire services national rather than local bodies, they were told this would make them ineligible for VAT refunds and they pressed ahead.

I’ve taken the quote from PoliticsHome.

May says she hopes the Australian government will act on the postal vote in favour of same-sex marriage very soon.

Labour’s Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi thanks May for campaigning in his constituency at the election. Labour’s majority went up. Will May assure him that Slough’s rail link to Heathrow will be a priority.

May says the government is electrifying the Great Western mainline, which will help her constituency, Maidenhead, and Slough.

Labour’s Angela Eagle says earlier this year May said she was the only person who could provide strong and stable leadership in the national interest. With her cabinet crumbling, how is it going?

May says Eagle is a member of a party that cannot even decide what it wants from Brexit.

May says the government is clear about wanting to protect the green belt.

Labour’s Lucy Powell says it is almost six months since the Manchester terror attack. Manchester has had to spend almost £17m as a result. Yet is has not been reimbursed. Will it be?

May says that is an important issue. She says the government will respond by the end of next week. She expects the majority of that funding to be supplied to Manchester.

Sir Vince Cable, the Lib Dem leader, says David Davis said in the City yesterday that freedom of movement would be maintained for bankers after Brexit. Why won’t it be preserved for other sectors, like agriculture, too?

May says the migration advisory committee is going to make recommendations on immigration after Brexit.

Labour’s Tracy Brabin says a constituent is having to get her ID verified by her doctor because she does not have photographic ID for her universal credit claim. Will May allow legacy identification from past benefits?

May says it is important to have proper ID for benefits. She urges Brabin to take this up with the DWP.

Zac Goldsmith, a Conservative, asks about the successful elections in Somaliland. The winning candidate has said he will legislate against female genital mutilation, inspired by a British campaign.

May says Goldsmith raises an important point. She is glad Somaliland is tackling FGM.

Stephen Lloyd, a Lib Dem MP, asks if May feels a sense of shame about benefit cuts.

May says universal credit will people to keep more of what they earn. It is the right reform, she says.

Updated

Paul Masterston, a Conservative, asks about a Romanian who attacked a girl in his constituency. What can be done to protect the public from people like this?

May says the Home Office is looking to deport this individual. She wants to maintain cooperation on security with the EU after Brexit, she says.

Labour’s Marie Rimmer asks about stabbings in her constituency. What will the government do to get more police on the streets?

May says she is concerned about these attacks. Police budgets have been protected. And a higher percentage of officers are now on the streets.

Labour’s Mary Creagh says Boris Johnson told the foreign affairs committee two weeks ago that he had seen no evidence of Russian meddling in the election. But May herself warned about Russia’s activities on Monday, and new evidence has emerged recently. Has Johnson been kept in the dark?

May says the examples she spoke of in her speech did not relate to the UK. She says the security and intelligence committee is being set up today.

Michelle Donelan, a Conservative, asks if May will consider getting medical students to sign a contract saying they must work for the NHS for the first five years after training, to stop the brain drain abroad.

May says the department of health is looking at this idea.

The SNP’s Stephen Gethins asks about a company in his Fife North East constituency which is under threat.

May says she raised it with Nicola Strugeon when the spoke yesterday.

PMQs - Snap verdict

PMQs - Snap verdict: That was one of May’s easiest PMQs for ages. Corbyn needs to recognise that sometimes less is more. Presumably, like all opposition leaders, he starts every Wednesday morning with a long list of topics he could raise at PMQs. Most successful communication involves an editing process - taking stuff out, and focusing on what is most effective etc - but today it felt as if Corbyn was determined to run through every topic on his list from 9am this morning. Sometimes his scattergun approach can work, but today it felt rambling and unfocused, and he never really got past May’s preliminary defences. His Boris Johnson/Uxbridge question was well phrased, and his revelation about the lettings agency and universal credit was striking, and quite shocking, but even on these issues May comfortable saw him off. She felt particularly confident talking about crime stats (as always - she still sounds like a home secretary) and her point about Labour councils and sprinklers sounded like a plausible retort to Corbyn’s Grenfell Tower question. It wasn’t a memorable or inspiring exchange, and it did seem to drag on for aged but, given the last few weeks she has had, May will head off for lunch with a sense of relief.

Updated

Corbyn says 5,000 teachers should have an idea of the funding problems their schools face.

He says public services are in crisis. But a super-rich few dodge their taxes. The Tories cut taxes for the few, and services for the many. Isn’t the truth that this a government that protects the super-rich, while the rest of us pick up the bill for poverty and the slashing of services.

May says the government has taken an extra £160bn in from tax avoidance measures. The tax gap is at the lowest level ever. If it were still at the level it was under Labour, it would take up the entire schools budget. Labour has backtracked over Brexit. They would lose control over the public finances. Corbyn may have brought momentum to his party, but he would bring stagnation to his party.

Corbyn says it is strange that the chief executive of NHS Provider says we are in the longest squeeze in NHS history. The number of people waiting a long period has gone up. As Tories jeer, he says Labour are the opposition (which is why he is asking these questions). He asked about school budgets recently. This week 5,000 head teachers wrote to the chancellor saying they wanted the money taken out of the system to be returned. Will the money be returned to school budgets?

May says Corbyn has got something right today: “We are the government, and he is the opposition.” He says there are 1,000 more patients seen in A&E within the four-hour standard every day compared to 2010. This is the first government for decades that has gripped the need for a fairer funding formula. And to have one, you need a strong economy. She says May is planning a run on the pound, the government is building a country fit for the future.

Corbyn says he is happy to show her that letter. Other letting agencies may do the same. Food bank use has gone up by 30% in areas where UC has been rolled out. And it is estimated child poverty will rise as a result. If those reasons are not enough to justify halting the roll out of UC, he doesn’t know what reasons are.

He says Simon Stevens said last week the NHS needed more money. Can May spend the next week ensuring that budget gives enough money to the NHS.

May says UC is keeping more people in work, and able to keep what they earn. On the NHS, he quotes Stevens saying the quality of care, and outcomes in the NHS, are improving. Over the last three years access to primary care services is improving. Cancer survival rates are up. That is the good news, she says.

Corbyn says we need to think about the safety of people in high-rise blocks.

He turns to universal credit, quoting from a letter from a lettings agency in Lincolnshire, where UC is being rolled out. The agency is telling tenants to move out because it will not be able to cope with the UC-generated rent arrears.

May says concerns have been raised about people on UC managing their budgets. But after four months the number of people on UC in arrears has fallen by one third. He invites Corbyn to send her the letter. At a previous PMQs she asked to see a letter he quoted. He never sent it.

Corbyn says one minister said he was “mystified and disappointed” at the closure of Uxbridge police station. That came from Boris Johnson, he says. He says the real reason it is closing because of a £2.3bn cut to police budgets in the last parliament. And they will be cut by another £700m by 2020. There are fewer firefighters in England. But last year deaths by fire increased by 20%. May said money would be no object to safety after the Grenfell Tower fire. Will May back the campaign to retrofit sprinklers?

May says the police and crime commissioner for London is the mayor. And Sadiq Khan is a Labour mayor, she says, although Corbyn may think Khan is not Labour enough for him. There is more money and officers for each Londoner than for anywhere else in the country.

On fire, she says the government takes the Grenfell Tower fire seriously. That is why the inquiry was set up, and building regulations are being reviewed.

On sprinklers, she says she wants homes to be fit. Some owners do retrofit sprinkers. Others take other measures. Look at what Labour councils do. She says Haringey, Lewisham, Lambeth and Islington have all queried the case for sprinklers.

Jeremy Corbyn also wishes the Queen and Prince Philip a happy platinum wedding anniversary.

He mentions the victims of the Iran earthquake, and says he hopes the UK is sending help.

And he offers sympathy to Carl Sargeant’s family following his death.

Crime is up, he says. Will May get the chancellor to give the police the funding they need to keep us safe.

May says the UK will do what it can to help the earthquake victims. And she offers her condolences to Sargeant’s family.

On crime, she says as measured by the crime survey it is down by nearly one third.

Tom Tugendhat, a Conservative, praises May’s stewardship of the economy. The deficit is down and debts are oversubscribed. Will May invest in the economy and build more homes?

May says Tugendhat has made an important point. The government is doing that, she says. We are seeing billions being spend on rail, and the biggest road building programme for a generation.

Theresa May starts by congratulating the Queen and Prince Philip on their platinum wedding anniversary on Monday.

Almost PMQs time. First question comes from Tom Tugendhat, one of the Telegraph's "mutineers"

— Patrick Kidd (@patrick_kidd) November 15, 2017

PMQs

PMQs is about to start.

#pmqs preview panel & review panel coming up now with @mimsdavies @JackDromeyMP & @NeilGrayMP order paper... scrutineers or mutineers? pic.twitter.com/VQoQs8kbje

— Faisal Islam (@faisalislam) November 15, 2017

It would be a struggle to find anyone who comments on politics professionally who will say things are going well for the government. In fact the consensus view at Westminster (not that the consensus is always right) is that the government is in a bit of a mess.

And yet the Tories are neck and neck with Labour in the polls, as our figures today confirm. (See 10.54am.) Why? Here are three blogs and articles that offer an explanation.

The sex scandals in Westminster are not regarded as a party political issue. Indeed, people often don’t know which party an accused MP comes from. When the former foreign secretary Robin Cook had an affair, the Tories thought that at last attention wold turn to Labour sleaze. In fact, because all the sleaze stories had been about Tories, voters just assumed Cook must be a Conservative. In today’s case, people regard all the accused as generic MPs. As a result, the sex scandal has reinforced the notion of politics as disreputable and that paying any attention to it is a waste of time. This partly accounts for the frozen polls.

The second reason why Labour isn’t thrashing the Tories at the moment is Jeremy Corbyn. Because he did much better than expected at the election, and Mrs May performed much worse, the suggestion has taken hold that he is an asset for Labour.

It is certainly true that voters regard him as authentic and likeable and think his heart is in the right place. It is also true that his presence has consolidated the left-wing vote and encouraged turnout among some left-wing voters. His poll ratings have dropped off a bit since the heady days immediately after the election, but this may be because he is a lot better on the stump than trying to be an alternative prime minister in the Commons.

The most common explanation on psepholoical Twitter is that people are “tuning out”. That’s intuitive because the main policy issue at the moment is Brexit, a lengthy process that doesn’t lend itself to “new news” very often. After all, if Matt Chorley is bored with Brexit, there probably isn’t much hope for the person on the street.

Next, the fundamentals haven’t shifted much. MORI’s gross satisfaction ratings, the spread of which tends to be a very strong predictor of election results, moved dramatically in the runup to the election, but have barely changed for either leader since (other pollsters have found broadly similar patterns).

The fact is, although Jeremy Corbyn’s personal numbers are now higher, both in absolute terms and relative to Theresa May, there are still plenty of voters that haven’t warmed to him. Does that mean there’s a “ceiling”on the Labour vote and a “floor”under the Conservative vote? I don’t know. But if the opposition can’t make significant ground given all of the tailwinds it currently has, it’s possible.

It’s the economy that still gives the Conservatives the upper hand – even if it is in a precarious position. The 1992 comparison offers an economic lesson to the Chancellor as he puts the finishing touches to his Budget next week. The trigger to Major’s downward ratings was Black Wednesday, when the government was forced to withdraw the pound sterling from the European Exchange Rate Mechanism. As a result, interest rates temporarily rose to 12 per cent. The Tories never recovered from losing their reputation of economic competence.

May still has it – even if the £1bn DUP deal has dented it and Brexit could puncture it if handled badly. As things stand, voters still say the Tories lead the way on economic competence. Until that changes, whether it’s through Labour winning the argument or the Tories losing the plot, don’t expect the polls to shift significantly. If Philip Hammond gives in to demands from some in his party for a radical Budget to end austerity with a borrowing binge, there may be a shift – it just might not be the one he is looking for.

Sky’s Beth Rigby says the amount of time people have to wait before they get their first universal credit payment, which is currently six weeks, is going to be cut, either by one week or two weeks.

NEW: ministers are to cut the controversial wait time for #UniversalCredit in the coming days, govt figure tells Sky News. Wait time going from 6 weeks to 5 at worst at month at best... https://t.co/Xawc5tAj7H

— Beth Rigby (@BethRigby) November 15, 2017

Speaking on BBC Radio 5 Live this morning Sir Vince Cable, the Lib Dem leader, said that it was “foolish” of the government to table an amendment to the EU withdrawal bill fixing 29 March 2019 as Brexit day. Cable said:

Whether we have a fixed date of March 3, or it’s June in the same year, is a trivial issue.

This idea of the fixed date was not put there because of business lobbying, it was put there because the hardliners - you know, the Duncan Smiths and the Rees-Moggs - wanted to be absolutely clear there was no backsliding.

Within the bigger Brexit debate it’s not the big picture. But it is something that does reduce the flexibility of the negotiations.

It’s a foolish thing to have done, and it does demonstrate the extent to which the government is under pressure from its own extreme Brexit, Ukip-type people.

Labour and Tories both on 41% in latest Guardian/ICM poll

And here are the latest ICM state-of-the-party polling figures.

Labour: 41% (down 1 from Guardian/ICM three weeks ago)

Conservatives: 41% (down 1)

Lib Dems: 7% (no change)

Ukip: 4% (up 1)

Greens: 2% (no change)

Here is Martin Boon, ICM’s director, on the latest results.

Tony Blair casually observed last week that Labour should be doing better in the polls, given the government’s current travails, for which he received a certain amount of opprobrium.

But he’s right about one thing – the polls are not moving. Indeed, the current stasis is no better reflected than by the observation that the stretch of neck-and-neck standings has reached five consecutive polls. Only one more such poll is needed to match the record of six in the ICM/Guardian series, when Labour’s (then) 5-point lead in August 2003 did not waver until the following February.

So it seems that there is currently an inverse relationship between the intensity of the political environment, and polls’ ability to move. We can only speculate that the public may have stopped watching, believing that current performance and events are dull in comparison to the politics of 2016, or even 2015.

I will post a link to the tables as soon as they go up on ICM’s website.

UPDATE: Here is the ICM write up on their website. And here are the tables (pdf).

ICM Unlimited interviewed an online sample of 2,010 adults aged 18+ on 10 to 12 November 2017. Interviews were conducted across the country and the results have been weighted to the profile of all adults. ICM is a member of the British Polling Council and abides by its rules.

Updated

The Scottish government has won its minimum alcohol pricing case at the supreme court, my colleague Severin Carrell reports.

Sexual harassment by MPs much more unacceptable than extramarital affairs, poll suggests

Our latest Guardian/ICM polling is out today. And it includes some findings intended to show how seriously people view the recent sexual misconduct allegations that have been levelled against various MPs.

We asked about nine potential misdemeanours by MPs and, for each of them, asked people if they found them a) acceptable, or at least a private matter irrelevant to being an MP; b) unacceptable, but not necessarily career ending; or c) totally unacceptable and career ending.

Here are the key points.

  • Voters are unforgiving and extremely critical of many of the activities MPs implicated in the recent sexual harassment scandal are alleged to have been engaged in, our poll suggests. It suggests that propositioning employees or much younger people for sex, repeatedly propositioning people, having legal pornography on a work computer and sexting are seen as “totally unacceptable and career ending” by at least 50% of people.
  • Propositioning employees or much younger people for sex is seen as particularly egregious, with 73% of respondents saying they would view it as “totally unacceptable and career ending”. Of the nine forms of potential misconduct we asked about, this came top in the “totally unacceptable and career ending” league table.
  • Sexual harassment in various forms is seen as much more unacceptable than consensual extramarital sex, the poll suggests.
  • Extramarital affairs, which in the past used to be the staple feature of Westminster sex scandals, are now tolerated much more by voters, the poll suggests. Having one came bottom in the “totally unacceptable and career ending” league table, with only 23% of people seeing them in that light. A quarter of respondents said having an extramarital affair was acceptable, or at least a private matter.

It should be stressed that these findings should not be linked to individuals. The poll questions did not refer to any MPs by name, and many MPs who have been accused publicly of sexual misconduct strongly deny any wrongdoing. But the general findings do illustrate quite how seriously people take the issue.

Here are the results in detail, listed in order of how unacceptable particular actions are seen.

Propositioning people for sex who are employees or who are much younger

Totally unacceptable: 73%

Unacceptable, but not necessarily career-ending: 18%

Acceptable, or at least a private matter: 4%

Repeatedly propositioning people for a date/sex

Totally unacceptable: 64%

Unacceptable, but not necessarily career-ending: 27%

Acceptable, or at least a private matter: 5%

Having legal pornography of a computer at work

Totally unacceptable: 54%

Unacceptable, but not necessarily career-ending: 36%

Acceptable, or at least a private matter: 6%

Sending sexually explicit text messages

Totally unacceptable: 50%

Unacceptable, but not necessarily career-ending: 31%

Acceptable, or at least a private matter: 14%

Causing offence by making uninvited sexual contact, eg touching a knee under a table

Totally unacceptable: 45%

Unacceptable, but not necessarily career-ending: 45%

Acceptable, or at least a private matter: 6%

Paying for sex

Totally unacceptable: 42%

Unacceptable, but not necessarily career-ending: 31%

Acceptable, or at least a private matter: 21%

Causing offence by making innuendo or comments of a sexual nature

Totally unacceptable: 34%

Unacceptable, but not necessarily career-ending: 54%

Acceptable, or at least a private matter: 7%

Occasionally propositioning people for a date/sex

Totally unacceptable: 34%

Unacceptable, but not necessarily career-ending: 39%

Acceptable, or at least a private matter: 21%

Having an extra-marital affair

Totally unacceptable: 23%

Unacceptable, but not necessarily career-ending: 48%

Acceptable, or at least a private matter: 24%

We’ve also got some state-of-the-party figures from the poll. I will post those figures shortly.

UPDATE: Here is the ICM write up on their website. And here are the tables (pdf).

ICM Unlimited interviewed an online sample of 2,010 adults aged 18+ on 10 to 12 November 2017. Interviews were conducted across the country and the results have been weighted to the profile of all adults. ICM is a member of the British Polling Council and abides by its rules.

Updated

Gove joins backlash against Telegraph as leave and remain Tories unite to condemn its 'mutineers' splash

Michael Gove, the environment secretary and one of the Vote Leave leaders, has joined those Conservatives criticising the Daily Telegraph for its “Brexit mutineers” front page attack on Tories fighting the EU withdrawal bill.

Gove posted this on Twitter a few minutes ago.

Steve is completely right https://t.co/epBpPM55f6

— Michael Gove (@michaelgove) November 15, 2017

He was commenting on this tweet from the Brexit minister Steve Baker from last night.

I regret any media attempts to divide our party. My Parliamentary colleagues have sincere suggestions to improve the Bill which we are working through and I respect them for that. https://t.co/t6r4ojKPbd

— Steve Baker MP (@SteveBakerHW) November 14, 2017

Dominic Raab, the justice minister and another leading leave campaigner, said much the same last night.

I agree. Colleagues today were reasonable and constructive. We are working together to get this important legislation right. https://t.co/LUgfS3lRjB

— Dominic Raab (@DominicRaab) November 14, 2017

Pro-remain ministers are equally unimpressed by the “Torygraph”. This is from the Foreign Office minister Alistair Burt.

Fabulous collection of some of the best MPs in the country. How small the Telegraph appears in comparison. https://t.co/3bl2Llyc44

— Alistair Burt (@AlistairBurtUK) November 14, 2017

And the “mutineers” themselves are also speaking out. This is from Stephen Hammond.

I was elected to represent my constituents and act in the country's best interest. Silly headlines from a discredited newspaper will not stop me from doing my duty. pic.twitter.com/aOjlt1FEy5

— Stephen Hammond MP (@S_Hammond) November 15, 2017

And this is from Heidi Allen.

If fighting for the best possible future for our country and our government is considered mutiny - then bring it on. pic.twitter.com/fTvOXqwhF5

— Heidi Allen (@heidiallen75) November 14, 2017

Here is our story on the anti-Telegraph backlash.

Updated

Unemployment remains at 4.3%

The unemployment figures are out, and unemployment remains at a 42-year low of just 4.3%.

But the number of people in employment across the UK has fallen, for the first time in nearly a year.

My colleague Graeme Wearden has the details on his business live blog.

Updated

EU withdrawal bill will be 'massacred' in Lords unless parts are rewritten, May told

The EU withdrawal bill started its epic 64-hour journey through its committee stage yesterday. The government won all the votes comfortably, but some Tory MPs strongly criticised the plan to specify the time and date of Brexit on the face of the bill, which will not come to a vote until day eight. Yesterday’s live blog covering the debate is here and here is the Guardian’s overnight story.

Although the row about amendment 381 (the last-minute government one fixing the Brexit date) dominates today’s newspaper coverage, including the Daily Telegraph’s Paul Dacre tribute effort, Sir Oliver Letwin, the Conservative former Cabinet Office minister and the coalition government’s policy chief, delivered an equally serious warning late last night, in the final minutes of the debate. He said the bill would get “massacred” in the House of Lords if the clause dealing with retained EU law doesn’t get rewritten. He told MPs:

It pains me to say this, but I think what several of us have been trying to say, put in very brief, is that clause six as it stands is a frightful mess.

Of course I shall be voting with the government tonight, but I very much hope after this debate - as did not happen after second reading - that the government will go away and think about clause six.

If it doesn’t what will happen is it will get massacred in the House of Lords - quite rightly - not least by former law lords, and once it has been it’ll be very difficult for those of us who know it’s a mess at the moment to support and attempt to overrule the House of Lords.

The debate resumes again this afternoon.

But it’s not all Brexit. Here is the agenda for the day.

9.30am: Fabian Picardo, the Gibraltar chief minister, gives evidence to the Northern Ireland affairs committee about Brexit.

9.30am: Unemployment figures are published.

9.45am: The supreme court rules on a challenge against the Scottish government’s minimum pricing for alcohol plan.

10am: A senior Honda executive gives evidence to the Commons Treasury committee about Brexit.

10.15am: Sir Vince Cable, the Lib Dem leader, Ian Blackford, the SNP leader at Westminster, shadow women and equalities minister Dawn Butler and Tory deputy chairman Amanda Sater give evidence to the women and equalities committee about women in the Commons.

12pm: Theresa May faces Jeremy Corbyn at PMQs.

12.15pm: Richard Ratcliffe holds a press conference after meeting Boris Johnson, the foreign secretary, to discuss his wife Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, who is detained in Iran.

Around 1pm: MPs start day two of the EU withdrawal bill’s committee stage debate. They will debate amendments relating to workers’ rights and environmental protections.

I will be focusing on the Brexit debate this afternoon but, until then, I will be covering breaking political news as it happens and PMQs, as well as bringing you the best reaction, comment and analysis from the web.

You can read all today’s Guardian politics stories here.

Here is the Politico Europe round-up of this morning’s political news from Jack Blanchard’s Playbook. And here is the PoliticsHome list of today’ top 10 must reads.

If you want to follow me or contact me on Twitter, I’m on @AndrewSparrow.

I try to monitor the comments BTL but normally I find it impossible to read them all. If you have a direct question, do include “Andrew” in it somewhere and I’m more likely to find it. I do try to answer direct questions, although sometimes I miss them or don’t have time.

If you want to attract my attention quickly, it is probably better to use Twitter.

Updated

Contributors

Patrick Greenfield (now) Andrew Sparrow (earlier)

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
May suggests EU will only get part of promised £39bn from UK if there's no Brexit deal - as it happened
Rolling coverage of the day’s political developments as they happen, including Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn at PMQs

Andrew Sparrow

12, Sep, 2018 @4:25 PM

Article image
UK needs to provide 'more clarity' about Brexit plans, Dutch PM tells May – as it happened
Rolling coverage of the day’s political developments as they happen, including Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn at PMQs

Andrew Sparrow

21, Feb, 2018 @5:49 PM

Article image
Esther McVey apologises for misleading parliament over universal credit - Politics live
Rolling coverage of the day’s political developments as they happen, including Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn at PMQs

Andrew Sparrow (now): and Peter Walker (earlier)

04, Jul, 2018 @7:05 PM

Article image
Boris Johnson says ‘nothing and no one’ will stop him carrying on as prime minister in wake of no-confidence vote – as it happened
As it happened: under-pressure prime minister says he has alienated Tory MPs because his government is doing ‘big, remarkable things’

Andrew Sparrow

08, Jun, 2022 @4:34 PM

Article image
Porn allegations: Damian Green sacked as first secretary of state – as it happened
Rolling coverage of the day’s political developments as they happen, as minister departs following allegations pornographic material was found on his Commons computer in 2008

Patrick Greenfield (now) Andrew Sparrow (earlier)

20, Dec, 2017 @11:36 PM

Article image
MPs told to pass Brexit deal by next Wednesday or face long article 50 extension - as it happened
MPs vote by 321 to 278 to rule out no deal despite government whipping Tory MPs against motion, following 312-308 win for Spelman amendment

Kate Lyons (now), Jedidajah Otte , Andrew Sparrow, Matthew Weaver (earlier)

14, Mar, 2019 @1:57 AM

Article image
MPs vote to give May power to trigger article 50 – as it happened
Rolling coverage of the day’s political developments as they happen, including Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn at PMQs and MPs debating and voting on the the Brexit bill allowing the government to trigger article 50

Andrew Sparrow

01, Feb, 2017 @9:21 PM

Article image
Brexit defeat for Theresa May as MPs back curbing government powers – as it happened
Rolling coverage of the day’s political developments as they happen, including Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn at PMQs and MPs debating and voting on the EU withdrawal bill

Andrew Sparrow

13, Dec, 2017 @8:41 PM

Article image
May wins 'meaningful vote' victory after lead rebel Grieve accepts compromise - as it happened
Follow live updates for PMQs, health secretary statement and Theresa May’s final push to head off a ‘meaningful vote’ rebellion on Brexit

Andrew Sparrow, Matthew Weaver, Jessica Elgot and Kevin Rawlinson

20, Jun, 2018 @5:13 PM

Article image
Labour wins symbolic victory in vote on universal credit - as it happened
Motion to pause universal credit rollout passes with 299 votes in favour and 0 against after most Tory MPs abstain. Follow latest updates

Nicola Slawson and Andrew Sparrow

18, Oct, 2017 @7:55 PM