Call for ministers to be more open about finances after Rishi Sunak code breach

Standards commissioner’s ruling has set precedent, says Labour MP who first asked PM about wife’s interest in childcare agency

Ministers may need to be more transparent about their financial interests after a “significant ruling” that found Rishi Sunak failed to declare his wife’s interest in a childcare agency, the MP who triggered the inquiry has said.

Catherine McKinnell, the Labour MP who first asked him about the potential conflict of interest, said the ruling set a precedent that meant ministers were likely to have to make greater disclosures in relation to their interests when questioned in parliament.

She said it confirmed that ministers were bound by the same rules as all other MPs when speaking in parliament and needed to declare relevant financial holdings – even if these are not public on the register of ministers’ interests.

The parliamentary standards commissioner, Daniel Greenberg, concluded on Wednesday that Sunak had breached the code of conduct by failing to declare that his wife, Akshata Murty, has an interest in a childcare firm called Koru Kids, when asked if he had any potential conflicts of interest in relation to his government’s new budget policies on childcare.

The prime minister had declared Murty’s stake to the cabinet secretary, and this was later published in the ministerial register of interests. However, he failed to mention it when being questioned by McKinnell on the liaison committee in March.

McKinnell told the Guardian: “Whether ‘inadvertent’ or a result of ‘confusion’, the commissioner’s findings make it very clear that the rules which apply to members of parliament … apply equally to government ministers, including the prime minister.

“Government ministers should be held to a higher level of transparency and scrutiny, not less.

“This also begs the question as to whether government ministers have other relevant financial interests that should be declared. After the damage caused by successive Conservative prime ministers and ministers behaving as though the rules do not apply to them, this is a significant finding that should result in greater transparency from government.”

Angela Rayner, Labour’s deputy leader, said it was “further evidence that the system needs a full overhaul”.

“Despite his apology and repeated promises of change, Rishi Sunak recently ditched a key recommendation from parliament’s standards committee, which Labour supported, to tighten the rules around declaring interests and hospitality,” she said.

“Labour will toughen up the system, increase transparency and introduce an independent ethics and integrity commission that will clean up our politics and restore standards to public life.”

In his ruling, Greenberg concluded that the breach had arisen out of the prime minister’s “confusion” around the rules on declaration.

He decided to close the inquiry without the need for further action after finding the error to have been made inadvertently.

Greenberg said: “In accordance with the code, Ms Murty’s shareholding was a relevant interest that should have been declared during the liaison committee meeting on 28 March 2023.”

He said he was satisfied that Sunak had “confused” the concept of registration relating to arrangements for ministers with the concept of declaration of interests under the code of conduct for MPs.

“I formed the view that the failure to declare arose out of this confusion and was accordingly inadvertent on the part of Mr Sunak,” he concluded.

“During a meeting with Mr Sunak on 30 June 2023 I acknowledged that he may not have been aware of Ms Murty’s shareholding at the time of the liaison committee meeting, but he had a duty to correct the record.

“However, Mr Sunak was aware of the interest when he subsequently wrote to the chair of the liaison committee, Sir Bernard Jenkin MP, on 4 April 2023, and he failed to declare the interest at that stage or correct the record.”

In a letter to the commissioner, Sunak said: “Should this scenario arise again, I have acknowledged that I have a duty to write to the committee after my appearance to correct the record.

“I accept and once again apologise that my letter to the liaison committee on 4 April 2023 was not sufficiently expansive, as it confused the language of registration and declaration.”


Rowena Mason Whitehall editor

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Rishi Sunak and Sajid Javid: the ministers who called out PM’s ‘tone’ and ‘values’
How does Rishi Sunak, once seen as Johnson’s most likely replacement, measure up against Sajid Javid?

Peter Walker Political correspondent

05, Jul, 2022 @6:48 PM

Article image
Ethics watchdog asked to assess if Rishi Sunak broke ministerial code
Chancellor did not declare wife’s multimillion-pound share portfolio in register of interests

Juliette Garside

29, Nov, 2020 @4:50 PM

Article image
Parliament watchdog opens investigation into Rishi Sunak
Investigation understood to be related to PM’s links to childcare firm in which his wife is an investor

Peter Walker, Jessica Elgot and Pippa Crerar

17, Apr, 2023 @5:52 PM

Article image
Rishi Sunak’s alleged breach of MPs’ rules: what we know so far
PM being investigated over failure to declare wife Akshata Murty’s shareholding in childcare firm

Peter Walker Political correspondent

17, Apr, 2023 @2:01 PM

Article image
From non-dom to green card: questions still facing Rishi Sunak
The chancellor remains under pressure after controversy over the tax affairs of his wife

Rowena Mason Deputy political editor

10, Apr, 2022 @6:13 PM

Article image
Rishi Sunak and Akshata Murty take careful approach to G7 power dressing
No £1,650 Valentino coats but no M&S either as wealthy pair seek to tread fine line between being relatable and stylish

Chloe Mac Donnell

19, May, 2023 @4:28 PM

Article image
Rishi Sunak faces fiscal dilemma after rare political misstep
Analysis: Ill-timed US trip and reluctance to turn bailout taps back on could tarnish chancellor’s carefully polished image

Heather Stewart Political editor

16, Dec, 2021 @7:07 PM

Article image
Keir Starmer links Zahawi controversy to Sunak family’s taxes at PMQs
Labour leader and SNP make reference to former non-domiciled status of PM’s wife at question time in Commons

Peter Walker Political correspondent

25, Jan, 2023 @1:31 PM

Article image
Rishi Sunak’s wife claims non-domicile status
Tax status allows Akshata Murty to avoid tax on foreign earnings

Rupert Neate

06, Apr, 2022 @7:28 PM

Article image
Key takeaways from Rishi Sunak’s 7,500-word Tory conference speech
PM dresses up HS2 cancellation as fresh start as he attempts to portray himself as candidate for change

Peter Walker Deputy political editor

04, Oct, 2023 @2:55 PM