Government defends using public funds for Boris Johnson Partygate legal advice

Exclusive: Edward Argar offers first public explanation for use of taxpayers’ money on Lord Pannick report

The government has defended using taxpayers’ money to foot the bill for legal advice concerning the investigation into Boris Johnson’s Partygate denials, with fresh questions raised about why officials signed off on the nearly £130,000 costs.

Edward Argar, a Cabinet Office minister, offered the first public explanation for why public funds had been used to commission a report by the lawyer Lord Pannick that criticised an inquiry by the privileges committee.

Despite Johnson stepping down as prime minister earlier this month, he is still being investigated over claims he misled parliament by denying any Covid rules were broken in No 10, despite hundreds of fines later being issued for such law-breaking.

The Guardian revealed in August that £129,700 was spent on legal advice by the Cabinet Office.

In the face of questions about why taxpayer money was being used to defend Johnson, who is now a backbencher, Argar quietly released a written answer on the parliament website during recess. He said it was because the privileges committee’s inquiry related to Johnson’s conduct “making statements at the dispatch box on behalf of the government as a minister”.

Argar also confirmed no ministerial direction was issued over the spending, which is what happens when civil servants are unconvinced of the value-for-money of a policy and get overruled by the minister in their department.

Alex Thomas, a programme director at the Institute for Government, who also served as a senior aide to a former cabinet secretary, said the move was unusual. He called on the government to “be clear about how public money has been spent and whether that relates to Johnson’s duties as prime minister or as an MP”.

Thomas added: “Paying for private legal advice is in any case unusual – and it would certainly seem irregular to fund anything that was not directly related to government business.”

Caroline Lucas, the Green MP who questioned Argar, said serious questions needed to be asked about why the civil service authorised the spending. “This payment for legal advice is a blatant and outrageous use of public money to protect an individual who is being investigated for his personal conduct in the house,” she told the Guardian.

“Yes, he was prime minister at the time, but the investigation is about his personal and individual decision to lie, which is why the possible consequences down the line include recall of his position as an MP. Dressing this up as government business simply does not wash.”

Angela Rayner, Labour’s deputy leader, said Truss should “put her foot down and prevent taxpayers from being forced to pick up” Johnson’s legal bill.

She said the former prime minister “spent months hiding the truth, dodging scrutiny and deceiving the public. But rather than holding him responsible for his indefensible behaviour, Liz Truss’s Tories are yet again backing him to the hilt, allowing him to bend the rules so voters have to pick up his legal bills.”

Rayner said the government had “taken a wrecking ball to the economy” and had “no respect for taxpayers’ money”.

The last remaining vacant seat on the seven-member privileges committee is expected to be filled on 11 October by the veteran Tory backbencher Charles Walker when the Commons returns from recess.

Meetings will be held, probably more often than the usual weekly rate, to comb through written evidence, with the chance of the first oral evidence sessions – which will be held in public – taking place before the end of October.

The Guardian understands Johnson is almost certain to be summoned, but may decide not to attend.


Aubrey Allegretti Political correspondent

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Watchdog looks into £220,000 public funding for Johnson Partygate defence
Exclusive: Director at NAO, which hasn’t launched a formal inquiry, plans to speak to Cabinet Office about legal costs over former PM’s denials in Commons

Aubrey Allegretti Political correspondent

01, Feb, 2023 @8:00 PM

Article image
Boris Johnson in line for more taxpayers’ money for Partygate defence
Exclusive: Taxpayers to foot another five-figure bill as government prepares to extend support for former PM for second time

Aubrey Allegretti Political correspondent

22, Feb, 2023 @6:42 PM

Article image
Partygate: ministers accused of writing ‘blank cheque’ for Boris Johnson legal bills
Exclusive: Cabinet Office to extend contract with law firm to defend claims ex-PM misled parliament, sources say

Aubrey Allegretti Political correspondent

13, Dec, 2022 @3:22 PM

Article image
Partygate inquiry delays blamed on government foot-dragging
Exclusive: MPs investigating Boris Johnson’s lockdown rule-breaking have been waiting more than three months for some evidence

Aubrey Allegretti

08, Nov, 2022 @9:19 PM

Article image
Kwarteng: Johnson could survive Partygate grilling and lead Tories again
Ally says he would ‘never rule out’ former PM’s return as he prepares to face the privileges committee

Aubrey Allegretti Political correspondent

19, Mar, 2023 @8:37 PM

Article image
Ten Partygate questions Commons committee could ask Boris Johnson
Former prime minister has submitted his 52-page defence and MPs have done their own investigations

Aubrey Allegretti Political correspondent

22, Mar, 2023 @6:00 AM

Article image
Boris Johnson Partygate report findings threaten to further derail Tories
Ex-PM’s allies pledge to target Tory members of committee and MPs who endorse its findings for deselection

Pippa Crerar and Aubrey Allegretti

15, Jun, 2023 @6:35 PM

Article image
MPs’ Partygate verdict on Boris Johnson may not arrive until May
Release of ex-PM’s defence dossier thought to be imminent, but privileges committee not expected to publish final report until April at the earliest

Aubrey Allegretti and Peter Walker

20, Mar, 2023 @7:28 PM

Article image
No 10 denies Boris Johnson is victim of stitch-up after fresh Partygate claims
Supporters of former PM say decision to hand over evidence of gatherings at Chequers during Covid is ‘final straw’

Aubrey Allegretti Senior political correspondent

24, May, 2023 @2:43 PM

Article image
Partygate report likely to be delayed after intervention by Boris Johnson
Former PM’s lawyers submitted fresh arguments to privileges committee, which it will have to report on before publishing findings

Aubrey Allegretti Senior political correspondent

13, Jun, 2023 @5:37 PM