Home Office defends right to seize Channel asylum seekers’ phones

Lawyers representing home secretary apologise for secrecy but tell high court that policy is lawful

The Home Office has defended its right to seize the mobile phones of asylum seekers who cross the Channel in small boats, telling the high court it helps officials gather evidence about the people smugglers who organise such journeys.

In a four-day judicial review, three asylum seekers are claiming that the home secretary unlawfully operated an unpublished, secret, blanket policy to seize phones from small-boat arrivals. Lawyers for the home secretary said that while they accepted some aspects of the policy that operated in 2020 were unlawful, the policy to seize phones from some people who arrived and instruct them to provide pin numbers to unlock data, including phone numbers, emails and photos, was lawful.

The policy instructing newly arrived asylum seekers to hand over phones and pin numbers operated between April and November 2020. It is likely to have involved the confiscation of thousands of mobile phones, the court heard in evidence earlier this week.

Sir James Eadie QC, representing the home secretary, Priti Patel, told the court on Thursday that this was a case about clandestine Channel crossings and attempts to circumvent proper border controls.

He said the crossings were putting lives at risk “in a manner that is grotesquely irresponsible” and that there was the very highest public interest in collating evidence obtained from phones that was likely to lead to the identification of the organisers so they could be prosecuted if appropriate.

Eadie said there was a basis for phone seizures under current legislation “where the relevant thresholds were met”.

The Home Office had initially denied the existence of this policy but later confirmed it.

Eadie acknowledged that the Home Office had breached its duty of candour in relation to initially failing to admit that the unpublished policy to seize phones existed. He said it was “extremely unfortunate” and apologised.

Alan Payne QC, also acting for the home secretary, said that a “reasonable grounds threshold” exists in legislation that permits items to be seized in relation to immigration and non-immigration offences.

The Home Office has conceded that the way the seizure policy was previously implemented was unlawful in some respects due to its blanket, unpublished nature. But Payne argued it was lawful in its current format – where fewer phones of arriving people are seized, and specific individuals, such those who helm the dinghies, are targeted.

The hearing continues.


Diane Taylor

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Home Office U-turn over deportation of Albanian asylum seekers
Letter undermines Priti Patel’s claim that Albanians arriving with ‘spurious’ claims could be removed quickly

Rajeev Syal Home affairs editor

26, Sep, 2022 @6:16 PM

Article image
Home Office proposals due on sending asylum seekers abroad
Legislation expected next week that could open way to moving asylum seekers offshore while claims pending

Jamie Grierson and Jon Henley

28, Jun, 2021 @12:06 PM

Article image
Home Office chief questions whether Rwanda plan will deter asylum seekers
Matthew Rycroft says that without evidence to justify the plan he cannot be sure it provides value for money

Andrew Sparrow Political correspondent

17, Apr, 2022 @12:04 PM

Article image
Home Office ignored Covid advice not to put asylum seekers in barracks
Public Health England warned against using Napier facility before outbreak of coronavirus, court hears

Diane Taylor

16, Feb, 2021 @6:58 PM

Article image
Home Office criticised for not housing asylum seekers properly as hotel costs mount
Government spending £4.7m a day on hotels, four times the amount previously stated

Amelia Gentleman

03, Feb, 2022 @6:29 PM

Article image
Home Office accused of ‘bullying’ asylum seekers into handing over phones
Judicial review begins in high court accusing government of operating a blanket policy in ‘complete secrecy’

Diane Taylor

25, Jan, 2022 @7:31 PM

Article image
Cross-Channel asylum seekers could be tagged under Home Office plans
Priti Patel expected to announce introduction of location tagging as part of immigration system overhaul

Andrew Sparrow Political correspondent

23, Dec, 2021 @12:57 PM

Article image
Home Office staff threaten mutiny over ‘shameful’ Rwanda asylum deal
On an intranet noticeboard civil servants drew a comparison with serving under Adolf Hitler, and asked if they had a duty to ‘resist’

Rajeev Syal and Mark Brown

20, Apr, 2022 @7:05 PM

Article image
Priti Patel could face Home Office mutiny over Rwanda asylum plan
Unions say civil servants could stage mass walkouts after home secretary overruled their concerns

Jenn Selby

16, Apr, 2022 @2:56 PM

Article image
Medical staff urge Priti Patel to close barracks housing asylum seekers
Letter to home secretary raises concerns about sites holding 600 men in Kent and Pembrokeshire

Jamie Grierson Home affairs correspondent

26, Nov, 2020 @12:01 AM