Parliament renovation could take 76 years and cost £22bn, report says

Study says project will be quicker and cheaper if MPs are moved to new location for duration of work

Restoring parliament without a full decant of MPs could take up to 76 years, while the bill for repairs would stretch to £22bn, a new report by the body set up to investigate how the project should be handled has found.

MPs, peers and senior parliamentary officials are still split on the best way to proceed with extensive works to the Victorian building given safety concerns about crumbling masonry, the lack of protection against flooding and decades-old electrical wiring.

Under the most recent plan, MPs were expected to move to Richmond House, the former home of the Department of Health, while the Palace of Westminster – with a floor plate the size of 16 football pitches and containing 1,100 rooms, 100 staircases and 3 miles of passageways – is being restored. However, the idea was abandoned last year.

Alternatives were drawn up and presented to the House of Commons Commission, which were released on Wednesday.

The cheapest plan involved a full decant of the Palace of Westminster, for between 12 and 20 years, with the work costing in the region of £7bn to £13bn.

With MPs elsewhere for much of the time, the report estimated the works would take between 19 and 28 years.

If MPs maintained a “continued presence” in the palace, where “all essential and highly desirable functions could be accommodated but in more condensed space”, the report found that the work would cost more and take longer.

In one scenario, business would remain within the Commons chamber “until such a point is reached whereby all operations are transferred to another space within the Palace of Westminster (assumed to be the House of Lords chamber), to allow the rest of the work to proceed”.

It estimated this would increase restoration costs to between £9.5bn and £18.5bn, taking 26 to 43 years.

And in a third possible scenario, which would cost the most and take the longest, business would remain within the chamber “throughout the entirety of the restoration and renewal programme of works” with “no transfer”.

It is estimated this would cost between £11bn and £22bn and take in the region of 46 to 76 years. This was conditional on recess being extended to scrap the three-week return for MPs between their summer and party conference breaks, so that there was no parliamentary business for four months, from mid-July to mid-October.

The figures do not take into account inflation, meaning the true cost over several decades would likely be billions more expensive, given compound interest.

The report was not well received by the Commons Commission, and led to it voting last month to bring the sponsor body for the works in-house.

One of the plans being considered by senior Commons officials is to use boats to deliver materials and remove detritus via the River Thames. This would help minimise disruption around Westminster, but also make it harder for MPs, peers and their staff to operate as normal on the current site.

Garry Graham, deputy general secretary of the union Prospect, said a full decant was “the only credible plan”, and would be cheaper, quicker and safer. He added: “We cannot allow the faux emotional attachments of some to get in the way of the restoration off the house being achieved safely, expeditiously and in a way that recognises the concerns of staff and achieves value for money for the taxpayer.

“I am sure that will be fully supported by the new minister for civil service efficiency. To come to any other conclusion would be perverse.”


Aubrey Allegretti Political correspondent

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
MPs should leave parliament for £4bn refit, says official report
Committee founded to plan Westminster work says it will be cheaper for MPs and peers to vacate building during restoration

Heather Stewart Political editor

07, Sep, 2016 @11:41 PM

Article image
Palace of Westminster renovation 'could take 32 years and cost £5.7bn'
Report gives MPs five renovation options to consider, most expensive being gradual approach that would allow palace to continue as seat of government

Rajeev Syal

18, Jun, 2015 @4:46 PM

Article image
Minority staff asked for security passes more in parliament, report finds
House of Lords changes rules after survey finds BAME workers excluded from facilities for mostly white peers

Martin Beckford

18, Feb, 2020 @6:16 PM

Article image
Lords Speaker says Donald Trump could still address parliament
Lord Fowler would keep ‘open mind’ if request was made as Commons Speaker faces backlash over anti-Trump remarks

Anushka Asthana and Peter Walker

07, Feb, 2017 @8:47 PM

Article image
No 10 should follow parliament and ditch TikTok, says Tory MP
Ex-leader Iain Duncan Smith urges ministers to cut ties with Chinese-owned platform over data fears

Aubrey Allegretti and Dan Milmo

03, Aug, 2022 @5:02 PM

Article image
Parliament apologises for photographing rough sleepers
Contractor took photos of homeless people as they slept near palace of Westminster

Diane Taylor

19, Sep, 2019 @2:25 PM

Article image
Brexit may cost MPs and peers the power to pass laws, says former judge
Lord Judge says ‘legislative tsunami’ caused by leaving EU poses historic challenge to parliamentary oversight and procedures

Owen Bowcott Legal affairs correspondent

03, May, 2017 @7:12 PM

Article image
Emmeline Pankhurst will stand her ground outside parliament
Proposed move of statue funded by suffragettes to Regent’s Park led to outcry

Aamna Mohdin

17, Sep, 2018 @11:51 AM

Article image
Brexit bill passes parliament as Johnson overturns Lords amendments
Opposition MPs condemn government after defeat of Dubs measure on child refugees

Peter Walker Political correspondent

22, Jan, 2020 @7:48 PM

Article image
Trump not expected to address parliament during UK state visit
Fears Speaker John Bercow’s opposition to speech could cause embarrassing row

Jessica Elgot Chief political correspondent

30, Apr, 2019 @4:32 PM