Labour has lost its heart and nerve in pandering to the right | Letters

Readers respond to articles by Andy Beckett and Peter Mandelson on the party’s political identity

The claim by Andy Beckett that Labour’s centre-left have run out of ideas is certainly true but doesn’t get to the heart of the problem(The problem is bigger than Keir Starmer – Labour’s centrists have run out of ideas, 24 September). The truth is that the centre-left of the Labour party has lost its nerve. This loss of nerve can be dated to 9 October 2007, when the then Labour chancellor, Alistair Darling, caved into the shadow chancellor, George Osborne, over inheritance tax.

Since then, Labour’s centrists have put their energies into placating critics on the right, specifically Tory voters and the rightwing press, and have largely ignored the needs of their natural supporters on the left. This obsession with “electability” has knocked the heart out of Labour because it has allowed the right to define its electability. Labour’s centre-left agrees with its rightwing critics that it can only be deemed electable when it is not a threat to the Conservative party and its interest groups.

I am sure that there are many centre-left politicians who know exactly what the country needs, but they do not have the nerve to propose it, explain it to the British people and defend it from criticism from the right. As a centre-left Labour voter, I do not expect the party to change much before the next election under the current leadership. I need to decide what to do with my vote. I do not intend to squander it.
Michael Kenny
Glasgow

• Andy Beckett writes that the centre-left has failed to come up with new and compelling ideas to address big contemporary issues. Maybe. But surely Brexit and the pandemic have taught us that what the country requires is better governance and fewer headline-grabbing panaceas. Germany provides an excellent model of stability through coalition at national and regional level, but in our first-past-the-post system, adult decision-making will remain a pipe dream until like-minded parties decide to work together to develop achievable ends.
Paul Tattam
Chinley, Derbyshire

• In writing that Labour must show “we are breaking decisively from the rejected programmes and hard-left culture of the past decade”, Peter Mandelson conveniently sidesteps the defeat of 2010 (Starmer can’t pin his hopes for success on Johnson’s incompetence, 23 September). The Blair/Brown governments had presided over a deregulated City, taken the country into a disastrous war and relied on using in-work benefits to subsidise low wages while housing benefit concealed a growing housing crisis. Not a “hard-left” programme, then. In fact, Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell initially slowed the decline in Labour’s vote, a decline begun when Mandelson was part of the team.
Dave Verguson
Lindley, Huddersfield

• Peter Mandelson has got it wrong. Labour does not need “a new agenda of modernisation”. The Labour party has always been an alliance of community interests with a leftish belief that labour should never be taxed more highly than capital and an egalitarian heart that seeks to lift up the weak. To reinvigorate the party, Labour needs to stop centralising “power and direction” and return to respect for its grassroots within the community and their needs.
Ben Tyler
London

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication.

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Labour’s continued inaction on Brexit | Letters
Letters: Guardian readers respond to John Harris’s piece on Labour’s collusion in leaving the EU

Letters

20, Nov, 2018 @6:09 PM

Article image
Frank Dobson was Heritage Labour | Letters
Letters: Guardian readers remember the former Labour minister, who has died age 79

Letters

13, Nov, 2019 @6:56 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Starmer’s Labour: time to take on the Tories | Editorial
Editorial: The Labour leader must know his party faces existential implications if it suffers a historic fifth election defeat

Editorial

26, Sep, 2021 @4:53 PM

Article image
What next for Labour’s thinking on Brexit? | Letters
Letters: Guardian readers respond to Brexit discussions at this year’s Labour conference

Letters

26, Sep, 2018 @4:46 PM

Article image
Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour party isn’t so radical | Letters
Letters: Readers reflect on policies laid out by the leader of the opposition and the shadow chancellor John McDonnell at the party’s conference in Liverpool

Letters

27, Sep, 2018 @5:54 PM

Article image
Should Labour try to win back ‘red wall’ voters? | Letters
Letters: Steve Smart warns Labour against simply trying to win back its traditional supporters in the old heartlands, Roy Boffy says these voters will be lost for ever unless the party seriously reappraises its parlous position, and Ron Glatter thinks the ‘northern problem’ is in danger of being overstated. Plus Derrick Cameron on Corbyn as a leader and Starmer as a manager

Letters

16, Dec, 2020 @6:15 PM

Article image
The creativity needed for Corbynomics to succeed | Letters
Letters: Alan Bailey, Peter Hain, Gillian Dalley, Keith Flett and Hedley Taylor on our editorial on Labour’s economic thinking

Letters

31, May, 2018 @4:43 PM

Article image
Unconventional wisdom on Labour ‘heartlands’ | Letters
Letters: Ian Wrigglesworth discusses the awkward fact that there is a substantial Tory vote in the north, Roger Backhouse advocates Old Lefties for Labour to win back the pensioner vote, Robert Leach says Labour should take a tip from the late former MP Jack Dunnett, and Dr Alyson Hall Yandoli proposes a new way of testing the leadership hopefuls

Letters

13, Jan, 2020 @5:42 PM

Article image
Which Labour leader do Tories fear most? | Letters
Letters: Jeremy Beecham says the fact that Conservatives are vehemently attacking Keir Starmer is telling. Donald Roy says it is not the case that only true Corbyn candidates were rewarded with volunteers and resources

Letters

31, Jan, 2020 @5:25 PM

Article image
How Labour can make itself electable again | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to a piece by Martin Kettle in which he says the party needs to take time for judgments to settle about its descent into the electoral abyss

Letters

05, Jan, 2020 @5:39 PM