Plans for expansion of Leeds Bradford airport put on hold

Climate campaigners say they have been told government is preventing the granting of planning permission

The expansion of Leeds Bradford airport has been put on hold after the government paused plans to build a new terminal building on the green belt.

The plans were given conditional approval by Leeds city council in February despite widespread opposition from local MPs, residents and environmental groups.

Campaigners argued the expansion would make a mockery of efforts to tackle the climate crisis and undermine the government’s credibility ahead of a key climate conference later this year.

Pressure on the UK as Cop26 approaches

Campaigners and climate experts have been increasingly concerned about a series of government actions that appear to be out of step with the government’s commitment to net zero emissions, ahead of hosting vital UN climate talks, called Cop26, this November in Glasgow. As host and president of the talks, the UK will have to bring squabbling nations together to agree to slash emissions drastically in the next ten years, and reach net zero emissions by mid-century.

Rebecca Newsom, head of politics at Greenpeace UK, said the government must reject airport expansion to show leadership at Cop26: “If true, pausing the plans is a sign that the government is starting to clock the catastrophic impacts of this proposed expansion. But we’re just months away from hosting critical global climate talks, and this climate-wrecking mega project is clearly incompatible with our plans to cut emissions, so why only delay the decision and not just call it in now? Quashing the expansion plans before the global climate summit begins would be a real show of climate leadership.”

Green groups received assurances from civil servants in 2019 that decisions on new infrastructure that could increase greenhouse gas emissions would take account of the government’s target of reaching net zero emissions by 2050. However, the supreme court ruled last December that the government’s commitments under the 2015 Paris agreement could effectively be ignored in the decision to press ahead with a third runway at Heathrow.

A group of more than 130 prominent scientists, academics and lawyers, including former Nasa scientist James Hansen, and UK former chief scientist Sir David King, last week wrote to the government expressing concern over the supreme court ruling, and warning that the government’s international climate commitments were being ignored. They wrote: “The highest court in the UK has set a precedent that major national projects can proceed even where they are inconsistent with maintaining the temperature limit on which our collective survival depends. Indeed, the precedent goes further still. It says that the government is not bound even to consider the goals of an agreement that is near universally agreed. Not only does that undermine the UK’s status as a champion of the Paris agreement just ahead of Cop26. It also substantially reduces humanity’s prospects of maintaining that limit and hence averting disaster.”

Other recent controversial decisions, such as the government’s initial backing for the Cumbrian coal mine, and a new round of licences granted to extract oil and gas from the North Sea, have also raised concerns. The government has scrapped its main green recovery measure, the green homes grant, which was intended to create thousands of green jobs by helping households to install insulation, and cut incentives to buy electric cars.

On Tuesday the government issued a direction to Leeds city council preventing councillors from granting planning permission without special authorisation.

The direction – set out in section 31 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015 – will give further time to Robert Jenrick, the communities secretary, to consider whether to formally “call in” the planning application.

As secretary of state, he has powers to take the decision-making power on a planning application out of the hands of the local planning authority by calling it in for his own determination.

If a planning application is called in, there will be a public inquiry chaired by a planning inspector, or lawyer, who would make a recommendation to the secretary of state. Jenrick can reject these recommendations if he wishes and would take the final decision.

Jenrick recently used the powers to intervene in plans to build a new coalmine off the Cumbrian coast.

The same lawyers who took on the government over the mine wrote to Jenrick asking him to do the same with the Leeds Bradford airport

“[The] expansion would commit the UK to decades of increased carbon emissions, against the Climate Change Committee’s advice,” barrister Estelle Dehon argued earlier this year, acting on behalf of the Group for Action on Leeds Bradford Airport (Galba). “As with the proposed Cumbrian coalmine, allowing this in the year we host Cop26 undermines the UK’s ambition to lead on the climate crisis.”

In a statement, Galba said: “Over the last few weeks we have had environmental groups, community groups, MPs, scientists and literally thousands of local people, writing directly to [Jenrick] asking for a public inquiry, and many more thousands have signed a petition. We hope that the delay is a sign that [he] is taking those requests very seriously. Leeds city council has refused to accept the responsibility to safeguard the health of the planet and future generations and a consequence the ball is in [Jenrick’s] court. He must take that responsibility and order a public inquiry.”

Supporters of the project say the airport expansion would boost the local economy by hundreds of millions of pounds and support thousands of new jobs.

They argue the contested proposal is not about expansion but delivering a cleaner, greener terminal building to support a hoped-for increase in passengers from 4 million to 7 million people a year by 2030.

A spokesperson for Leeds Bradford airport, said: “We acknowledge the deadline extension and hope that the secretary of state for housing, communities and local government will uphold Leeds city council’s approval for our replacement terminal, which will deliver thousands of new jobs and support the region’s economy. Our proposals will deliver the UK’s most efficient terminal building, enabling us to become a net zero airport, building back better and enhancing connectivity within the UK and internationally.”

A spokesperson for Leeds city council said: “We have been informed today by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government that the secretary of state will take some additional time to consider the Leeds Bradford airport planning application.

“The application is a complex one and has generated a significant amount of interest at both a local and national level. We await the secretary of state’s decision in due course.”

Contributor

Helen Pidd

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Government under pressure to stop Leeds Bradford airport expansion
Critics say plan would wreck efforts to tackle climate crisis and undermine UK credibility ahead of Cop26

Matthew Taylor

25, Feb, 2021 @3:00 PM

Article image
International climate scientists join call to halt Leeds Bradford airport expansion
Academics write to Robert Jenrick predicting dire consequences for climate crisis if plans go ahead

Matthew Taylor

04, Mar, 2021 @1:47 PM

Article image
Is the Covid-19 crisis the catalyst for greening the world's airlines?
Aviation is struggling and seeking support, but there are demands for it to give something in return

Jonathan Watts

17, May, 2020 @2:26 PM

Article image
Climate campaigners call for halt to regional UK airports expansion
Ministers must consider cumulative impact of proposals ‘likely to compromise’ emissions targets

Matthew Taylor

08, Apr, 2021 @8:37 AM

Labour rebels opposed to third runway give backing to new airport in Thames estuary

Cross-party group to argue that take-offs and landings over water would reduce noise

Hélène Mulholland and Dan Milmo

12, Jan, 2009 @12:01 AM

Article image
Councils opposing Heathrow expansion to call for new rail network around airport
Blueprint prepared by coalition of 22 local authorities shows how the airport could become a rail hub serving large areas of London and south-east England

Hélène Mulholland

27, Jan, 2009 @3:24 PM

Article image
Cutting air passenger duty to help Flybe could wreck UK carbon plan
Frequent flyer levy and cheaper trains would help with environmental pledges – but neither is planned

Fiona Harvey Environment correspondent

14, Jan, 2020 @2:49 PM

Benn warns against breaching EU air pollution limits at Heathrow

Environment secretary's intervention could put brake on government expansion plans

Patrick Wintour

15, Dec, 2008 @12:01 AM

Article image
Social attitudes survey: Takeoff time for guilt over air travel

Survey shows many voters agree fares should rise to offset damage to environment caused by flying

John Carvel, social affairs editor

28, Jan, 2009 @12:01 AM

Article image
No immediate increase in flight taxes, transport secretary says

Lord Adonis defends third Heathrow runway and rejects additional levy to dissuade passengers from air travel

Dan Milmo, transport correspondent

09, Sep, 2009 @3:33 PM