Johnson’s hypocrisy on ‘saving’ the union | Letter

No other Conservative leader has done so much to undermine the constitutional framework that binds the UK together, writes Paul Dolan

Boris Johnson has the audacity to tell his backbench MPs that he believes the EU is intent on “breaking up our country” (Brexit: UK negotiators ‘believe brinkmanship will reboot trade talks’, 11 September), while in truth no Tory leader has done so much to undermine the constitutional framework that has bound the UK together since Bonar Law a century ago.

His penchant for centralising responsibilities devolving back from Brussels is exemplified in the new internal market bill, which is already alienating Edinburgh, Cardiff and Belfast over its naked power grab on such matters as state aid, trade regulation and revenue raising.

If his great Brexit gamble was to exchange the EU’s single market with a neoliberal north American market, the refusal of the EU to offer a Canada-style trade treaty – and the threat of the formidable Irish lobby in Congress to block any US-UK trade deal until the possibility of reimposing an Irish border is removed – could fatally scupper those ambitions. This, at the high noon of a cliff-edge transition period, would inflict enormous political damage upon the Tories, but even more on their leader.
Paul Dolan
Northwich, Cheshire

• This article was amended on 15 September 2020. An editing error meant that the letter referred to “the Bonar Law”, when Bonar Law was a Conservative politician who served as prime minister of the UK from 1922 to 1923.

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
To save the union, a new constitutional settlement is needed | Letters
Letters: The status quo is unsustainable, writes Lord Salisbury, while John Thomson says that we must rebuild our relationship with Europe and Richard Ross turns his attention to the House of Lords

Letters

02, Jul, 2021 @3:49 PM

Article image
Labour and England’s place within the union | Letter
Letters: Labour also wants England governed by the same union state that is fracturing in front of our eyes, notes Prof John Denham

Letters

05, Jul, 2021 @4:28 PM

Article image
The Guardian of view of Boris Johnson’s folly: a plan to divide and misrule | Editorial
Editorial: History is littered with past mistakes of splitting peoples into nationalists and unionists. The prime minister seems wont to repeat them

Editorial

11, Apr, 2021 @4:31 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the future of the Union: Britain faces breakup | Editorial
Editorial: The combination of Boris Johnson, Covid and Brexit is creating a constitutional crash that is waiting to happen in 2021

Editorial

29, Dec, 2020 @4:00 PM

Article image
Losing all hope that the union can survive Boris Johnson | Letters
Letters: Readers reflect on the deepening divisions between the four nations

Letters

12, Apr, 2021 @4:46 PM

Article image
Understanding Englishness and the national identity crisis | Letters
Letters: Prof John Denham argues that to be English is, for many, not wanting to be ignored, Jim Grozier thinks it is time for someone to come up with new, ‘neutral’ names for the various parts of England, while Rev Ray Skinner debates devolution

Letters

22, Nov, 2019 @5:11 PM

Article image
Brexit: the Irish question and the English puzzle | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to a Guardian article by Fintan O’Toole

Letters

21, Nov, 2018 @5:41 PM

Article image
Britain’s breakup could benefit all of its parts | Letters
Letters: Paul Salveson, Philip Wood, Lorna Slater and Anthony O’ Neill respond to articles by Aditya Chakrabortty and Martin Kettle

Letters

17, Oct, 2019 @5:03 PM

Article image
Northern Ireland, the union and shifting borders | Letters
Letters: Radical changes to the United Kingdom’s borders are not unprecedented, writes Alan Wallace, while Declan O’Neill says that reunification is now a real possibility

Letters

05, May, 2021 @4:15 PM

Article image
Boris Johnson’s hypocrisy over Sir Kim Darroch | Letters
Letters: Sir Henry Wotton’s definition an ambassador has been misquoted again, in the case of Sir Kim Darroch, writes Frank Berman. Plus letters from Pete Dorey and Jane Barrett

Letters

10, Jul, 2019 @5:26 PM