Robert Jenrick: why are there calls for inquiry into minister?

Housing secretary is at centre of ‘cash-for-favours concerns’ over east London development

Why is the housing secretary, Robert Jenrick, at the centre of controversy over a building development in London?

Jenrick knew that billionaire former media tycoon Richard Desmond had only 24 hours to have an east London property development approved before council community charges were imposed that would have cost him more than £40m. He and his government department initially backed Desmond’s plan to construct 1,524 apartments on the site. The minister later accepted that his approval in January of Desmond’s project on the old Westferry Road printworks on the Isle of Dogs was unlawful.

What was the £40m charge that Desmond could have avoided for?

The council area where the proposed property development was to be sited is in the poorest borough of London – Tower Hamlets. The £40m charge is part of the local council’s community infrastructure levy (CIL). This is a local “tax” on residential and business property developments in Tower Hamlets that the council then uses to reinvest in poorer communities in areas such as health clinics and educational facilities.

Why did Jenrick reverse his original decision on Desmond’s Isle of Dogs development?

The housing secretary admitted that any “fair-minded and informed observer” could conclude there was a “real possibility of bias”, although he insisted he was not actually biased in favour of Desmond’s project. He then quashed his original decision and has now handed over the final say on whether the project will go ahead to another minister. However, the Labour mayor of Tower Hamlets and others including an ex-Tory councillor believe he did this to avoid having to release crucial documents relating to his original decision. Mayor John Biggs remarked that Jenrick’s “reluctance to disclose them speaks volumes”.

Why has the Labour party called for an inquiry into the affair?

Richard Desmond, the former owner of the Daily and Sunday Express alongside the Star titles, has donated thousands of pounds to the Conservative party. Desmond paid £12,000 to attend a Tory Carlton Club fundraising dinner last November at which he and other property developers sat with Jenrick.

There are also allegations that Jenrick gave a “behind closed doors” briefing on government plans for the property sector at an event hosted by a PR firm that had acted for Desmond on the controversial Isle of Dogs site. Given his financial support for the Tories, Labour says there are “cash-for-favours concerns” that must be investigated.

Will there be any lasting damage to the housing secretary or the Conservative party?

One long-serving Conservative councillor in Tower Hamlets, Andrew Wood, has already resigned from the Tories in protest over the affair and has called on MPs in parliament’s housing select committee to launch an investigation. Downing Street says Boris Johnson has “full confidence” in Jenrick. A Tory party spokesperson insisted this weekend that “government policy is in no way influenced by party donations – they are entirely separate”.

However, the controversy has raised suspicions once again over the links between big business and the party, which enjoys the largesse of multi-millionaires and billionaires such as Desmond. Nor is the affair likely to fade away in the foreseeable future.

The Liberal Democrats have raised questions in parliament about whether the housing secretary has broken the ministerial code. The code is a set of rules and guidelines to uphold proper standards of conduct amongst ministers. The code instructs all ministers to “declare and resolve any interests and relationships” and “take decisions impartially, fairly and on merit, using the best evidence and without discrimination or bias”.

Contributor

Henry McDonald

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Boris Johnson backs Robert Jenrick despite planning row
Senior MP says questions remain over links between housing secretary and Richard Desmond

Heather Stewart and Rajeev Syal

25, Jun, 2020 @12:23 PM

Article image
No 10 distances itself from Robert Jenrick over planning row
Richard Desmond contradicts housing secretary’s version of events at party fundraiser

Peter Walker Political correspondent

22, Jun, 2020 @1:22 PM

Article image
The three housing controversies Robert Jenrick is facing down
What exactly are the issues keeping the once barely known UK communities secretary in the headlines?

Peter Walker Political correspondent

25, Jun, 2020 @3:08 PM

Article image
Robert Jenrick under pressure to resign after donor-row documents released
Housing secretary ‘insisted’ planning decision for £1bn development should be rushed through

Rajeev Syal and Heather Stewart

25, Jun, 2020 @8:58 AM

Article image
Labour calls on Robert Jenrick to make statement over billionaire's donation
Richard Desmond gave money to Tories shortly after housing secretary intervened in planning decision

Peter Walker Political correspondent

10, Jun, 2020 @3:46 PM

Article image
The Robert Jenrick planning row explained
Housing secretary’s approval of £1bn development has come under increasing scrutiny

Heather Stewart and Rajeev Syal

24, Jun, 2020 @7:17 PM

Article image
Robert Jenrick ducks Commons question on planning intervention
Government urged to explain why communities secretary approved billionaire’s scheme

Peter Walker Political correspondent

11, Jun, 2020 @4:17 PM

Article image
Robert Jenrick says he regrets dining with donor before planning decision
Housing secretary says there was no bias in approval of Richard Desmond’s Westferry scheme

Simon Murphy Political correspondent

22, Jul, 2020 @11:55 AM

Article image
Labour quizzes PM on planning decision that saved Tory donor £40m
Boris Johnson asked to disclose any contact with donor Richard Desmond prior to housing minister overruling council

Peter Walker and Heather Stewart

17, Jun, 2020 @5:18 PM

Article image
The Robert Jenrick scandal isn't unique – British politics is awash with donor cash | Peter Geoghegan
There is huge potential for conflicts of interest while there is so little transparency about donations, says Peter Geoghegan of openDemocracy

Peter Geoghegan

30, Jun, 2020 @12:06 PM