Myths around further education policy and student targets | Letters

David Blunkett reacts to Gavin Williamson’s comments about graduates in non-graduate jobs. Philip Knowles points out that the target was for 50% of young people to go into higher education, not just university

The education secretary, Gavin Williamson, has taken what is now a familiar sideswipe at British higher education, while quite correctly lauding the importance of developing further education (FE) and vocational skills (Ministers to ditch target of 50% of young people in England going to university, 9 July).

His assertion, in his speech on FE reform, that graduates taking non-graduate jobs resulted in “filtering down” and therefore displacing jobs that would have been taken by less-qualified students repeats a commonplace myth.

First, the evidence for this is substantially based on salary comparators that take no account of the different labour market conditions outside London and the south-east. Second, many higher education students transition into jobs requiring the capacity and flexibility needed in a rapidly changing global economy.

Most significantly – and this seems to have escaped the government completely – is that if students who in the next three years are restricted or discouraged from going to university, they will of course “filter down” in taking the very jobs that the chancellor’s kickstart programme is designed to provide for those without the prospects that higher education brings. It is difficult to see how more perverse government policy could be towards post-16 education.
David Blunkett
Labour, House of Lords

• There was never a target of 50% of young people going to university. As your article says, the target was for 50% of young people to go into higher education. That means level 4, 5 and 6 qualifications. Levels 4 and 5 would typically be studied at FE colleges as HNCs and HNDs, plus foundation degrees, as well as professional qualifications.

The constant misstatement by the media has perpetuated the myth about the target being solely about university, and has possibly resulted in many people who would have been better served by doing a vocational or professional qualification part-time at an FE college going to university. The aim that half our population should be better qualified than A-level standard (particularly in vocational qualifications) is reasonable and could help improve our low productivity levels.
Philip Knowles
Richmond, North Yorkshire


The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Treasury expected to balk at further education loan plans
Gavin Williamson hails plans for ‘lifelong loan entitlement’ but Treasury is hostile to expanding system

Richard Adams and Sally Weale

21, Jan, 2021 @5:17 PM

Article image
Further education sector has been failed across the board | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to Polly Toynbee’s article about skills training in Britain


07, Dec, 2018 @4:44 PM

Article image
Fresh ideas in education blocked by stale thinking | Letters
Letters: Innovations in classroom practice have been continually hampered by a government that prefers to maintain the status quo, writes Kevin Donovan. Plus letters from Kathryn Riley, and Martin Large and Anna Dusseau


08, Jan, 2021 @3:49 PM

Article image
Evaluating the true purpose of universities | Letters
Letters: In scrapping university targets, this government will reverse progress and limit access to higher education for working-class students, writes Gary Nethercott, while Rhona Jamieson tackles the education secretary’s assumptions about the value of a degree


24, Jul, 2020 @3:15 PM

Article image
University education: a £10k salary boost for the price of three flat whites? | Letters
Letters: Responses to Aditya Chakraborrtty’s article on ‘mis-sold and overhyped’ universities that are ‘just a con’


24, Sep, 2018 @5:41 PM

Article image
English schools in areas worst hit by Covid to close for longer
Education secretary says schools in areas with highest Covid rates will not reopen for much of January

Richard Adams Education editor

30, Dec, 2020 @7:48 PM

Article image
An educational system not fit for purpose | Letters
Letters: Distinctions between academic and vocational qualifications are increasingly outmoded argue Pam Tatlow and Roy Boffy


19, Aug, 2018 @4:37 PM

Article image
What kind of revolution can follow the Tories' education crisis?
Too popular, too hopeless, too dead-end – Gavin Williamson awards low marks to England’s universities during adult learning speech

Richard Adams Education editor

09, Jul, 2020 @7:44 PM

Article image
Universities in England favour cancel culture over quality, says Williamson
Education secretary tells vice-chancellors they risk undermining public confidence in higher education

Richard Adams Education editor

09, Sep, 2021 @2:43 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on further education reform: the wrong answers | Editorial
Editorial: Plans to boost training and skills should have much greater urgency, given the unemployment crisis facing young people


01, Feb, 2021 @6:39 PM