Dreams of a modern parliament are as crumbled as the palace | Letters

What a shame that a temporary chamber is to be built in London, writes Matt Dobson. Meanwhile John Rigby and Dr Peter Phillips lament a missed opportunity

If there is any singular image of the state of British politics in 2019 it is surely that of the Houses of Parliament: crumbling, unfit for purpose, leaking, and ultimately another London-centric money pit (Green and pleasantly familiar, 9 May).

Isn’t it a sad state of affairs when we attach the words “icon of democracy” to what is essentially just a functional space of bricks and mortar with the odd gothic flourish, green leather and a River Thames setting?

What a shame that a temporary chamber is to be built in London. Here is an idea: a roaming chamber for the duration of the refurbishment. Get out into the provinces politicians claim to hear yet do nothing for. Force politicians out of the capital and into our towns and cities forgotten by so many.

Hire out our council chambers, cathedrals, school sports halls, arts venues strapped for funding due to council cuts, use our hotels and small businesses trying to make ends meet, get out and see where the decisions, or lack of, made in that great building on the Thames are having an effect.

Get people feeling like they can engage with politics and are finally being engaged with outside of election season. Go to Cornwall or Blackpool or Skegness in the low season, or spend more than a week in the Welsh Valleys or a pit town in County Durham, try taking a train or bus anywhere outside of London. Come see us rather than scurrying to another building in Whitehall. That would surely be a better icon of democracy.
Matt Dobson
Whitley Bay, Tyne and Wear

• Your headline “Green and pleasantly familiar” describing our new temporary parliament says it all. The artist’s impression indicates that the architects’ brief specified an outdated adversarial seating arrangement and no electronic voting. One wonders if they’ve also specified 480 seats so that 170 members have to remain standing, as now. What other advanced democracy would require a facsimile of a 19th-century parliamentary operation, while ripping apart a Grade II*-listed building for a mere £1.6 bn?

Parliamentary authorities might be able to afford a fit-for-purpose assembly building with seats for everyone plus electronic voting if they moved lock, stock and barrel to Manchester or Leeds – and still have some loose change to spend on local services.
John Rigby
Much Wenlock, Shropshire

• The current wrangling and impasse over Brexit surely show that the adversarial layout of the House of Commons reflects an outdated political pattern of representation and inhibits dialogue. How, then, can it be “modernisation” when the layout is to be perpetuated in the temporary chamber and eventually restored to panelled splendour in a decade or so? This could have been an opportunity for bold experiment. Perhaps it is a mark of political immaturity and uncertainty that we cannot follow the example of the parliament buildings in Edinburgh and Cardiff and, indeed, most other parliaments abroad.
Dr Peter Phillips
Swansea

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
We have outgrown the Houses of Parliament | Letters
Letters: Westminster’s parliament buildings are archaic and inherently undemocratic argue Dr Louis Hellman, Mick Duncan, Lynne Armstrong and Jim McLean

Letters

09, May, 2022 @3:16 PM

Article image
Why hoarding power in London doesn't work | Letters
Letters: When things go wrong, the instinct of ministers and officials is to seek more central action, writes Prof John Denham

Letters

20, May, 2020 @4:27 PM

Article image
Devolution and the problem of English democracy
Letters: John Marriott suggests a series of reforms, Declan O’Neill says a breakup of England might preserve Britain, Tony Mackay detects a drop in the quality of Scottish parliamentary debate, Randhir Singh Bains wants an English identity that embraces ethnic minorities and Keith Flett on London’s issues

Letters

02, Jul, 2019 @4:44 PM

Article image
Whisper it, but maybe the Palace of Westminster has had its day
Portcullis House has already become the centre of gravity for MPs, proving that parliament can adapt. Maybe it’s time to look beyond the great old Gothic pile

Michael White

03, Mar, 2015 @7:00 PM

Article image
Dragging parliament into the 21st century | Letters
Letters: Judith Martin and Jol Miskin agree that moving parliament away from London is a good first step

Letters

12, Nov, 2019 @5:39 PM

Article image
To save the union, a new constitutional settlement is needed | Letters
Letters: The status quo is unsustainable, writes Lord Salisbury, while John Thomson says that we must rebuild our relationship with Europe and Richard Ross turns his attention to the House of Lords

Letters

02, Jul, 2021 @3:49 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Johnson and devolution: another reckless gamble | Editorial
Editorial: The internal market bill is too easily portrayed as a Westminster power grab at the expense of the Scottish and Welsh governments

Editorial

30, Sep, 2020 @5:50 PM

Article image
We need to get participatory democracy back on track | Letters
Letters: Colin Montgomery on tackling the political stalemate, Ian Flintoff on how to better inform and involve voters, and Jeremy Beecham on enhancing the role of local government

Letters

27, Oct, 2019 @5:37 PM

Article image
A chance to break out of the Westminster bubble | Letters
Letters: The fairyland palace by the Thames created by Barry and Pugin can then become the museum of English and British history they always intended it to be

Letters

09, Sep, 2016 @5:54 PM

Article image
UK regional airports will be hit hard by Heathrow’s third runway | Letters
Letters: Expanding Heathrow would mean fewer flights elsewhere and further entrench the geographical economic divide in our country, writes Paul McGuinness. While Carolyn Hayman wonders what’s behind British Airways’ support for the scheme

Letters

20, Jun, 2018 @4:49 PM