Tony Blair needs a further period of reflection | Letters

Readers react to Tony Blair’s advice to ditch Corbynism and the party’s ‘brand of quasi-revolutionary socialism’

Your report on Tony Blair’s speech referred to the election result being Labour’s worst defeat since 1935 (Ditch Corbynism or Labour will soon be finished, Blair tells party, 19 December). This is true in terms of seats, but the vagaries of our electoral system mean that this is not an objective measure of support, which can only be realised by giving the proportion of those voting for the party. If that is done we get a radically different result.

Of all the general elections held since (and including) 1979, Labour performed worse in four than they did on 12 December, when they received 32%. In 2015, under Ed Miliband, this was 30.5%; in 2010, under Gordon Brown, 29%; in 1987, under Neil Kinnock, 31%; and in 1983, under Michael Foot, 28% (all percentages to the nearest 0.5%).

Moreover, the result for Labour in Corbyn’s other election in 2017 was the joint second best of these elections (it was similar to the 2001 result). Yes, 2019 was a bad result, and Labour must have a sensible discussion about how we go forward, but that will not be helped by asinine comments from Blair, dismissing Labour’s manifesto as “a brand of quasi-revolutionary socialism” that “never has appealed to traditional Labour voters”. The Labour manifestos of 1945, 1966 and 1974 were well to the left of what Labour offered on 12 December, and were supported by a majority of voters.
Peter Rowlands
Swansea

• Tony Blair must bear a large part of the responsibility for Labour’s rout in the 2019 general election. In the last two Jeremy Corbyn has scored a higher total vote and a higher percentage of the vote than Gordon Brown and Ed Miliband in the two previous general elections. In 2017 he scored more votes and almost the same vote share as Blair did in 2001 when he won 413 seats.

The reason for a great deal of our current political predicament is our first-past-the-post voting system, which Blair could have changed when in office, but chose not to. Now it is doing for the Tories what it did for him, and giving them a large majority on a minority share of the vote. An example of the anomalies created by this is that the Liberal Democrats got half as many votes in Scotland as Labour, but have four MPs to Labour’s one.

Across the UK as a whole in this election, the Tories have one seat for around every 38,000 votes, Labour have one seat for more than 50,000 votes, and the Lib Dems one seat for about 330,000.

In this election there was a clear majority for parties supporting remain, or a second referendum, but about one-third of the electorate did not vote, maybe because they live in safe seats where their vote makes no difference. Who knows how people would have voted if they had been able to vote for their real preference and not to try to stop the party they didn’t want. This is not democracy.
Sue Hawthorne
Haddington, East Lothian

• Imagine a UK in which all utilities were nationalised, there was a massive social housing programme building up to 300,000 dwellings a year, top rate of tax was 90%, shipbuilding, railways, civil aviation, coal, cable and wireless were all in public ownership and free collective bargaining was the norm.

An extreme leftwing fantasy? No, the UK during the years of Tory rule in 1951-64. Tony Blair’s characterisation of current Labour policies as “quasi-revolutionary socialism” reveals the hitherto undiscovered socialist tendencies of Churchill, Eden, Macmillan and Douglas-Home – or, more likely, how far to the right UK politics has travelled.
Jack Gingell
Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk

• Tony Blair says ditch Corbynism or Labour will be finished. This from the prime minister whose government awarded railway franchises to Wales and the north of England that have resulted in us still having to travel in Pacer trains into 2020. This was how he treated the Labour heartlands. Give me Corbynism any day.
Brian Matthews
Wrexham

• Come back, Blair. All is forgiven.
Valerie Crews
Beckenham, London

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Could tactical voting save Britain from the Tories? | Letters
Letters: John Lynch and Declan O’Neill respond to an article on how tactical voting, as seen in the recent byelections, could reshape British politics. Plus a letter from David Smith

Letters

26, Jun, 2022 @4:42 PM

Article image
Labour needs to shine a light on Tory failures | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to a piece by Andy Beckett, where he argues that the Conservative party is avoiding blame for the dire state of Britain today

Letters

02, Dec, 2019 @6:37 PM

Article image
Labour’s radicalism is of no use if it cannot win general elections | Letters
Letters: John Corner welcomes Labour’s bold ideas, but Steve Flatley warns they will be merely academic if the party is defeated in December, and Shaun Soper says the party is ignoring centrist voters

Letters

19, Nov, 2019 @5:57 PM

Article image
Shifting alliances that might swing the election | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to Nigel Farage’s decision to stand down Brexit party candidates in Tory-held seats, and the possibility of Labour joining a progressive anti-Brexit pact

Letters

12, Nov, 2019 @5:39 PM

Article image
Election panics, polls and prophecies | Letters
Letters: Guardian readers respond to the news that Britain will once again take to the voting booths on 12 December

Letters

30, Oct, 2019 @6:20 PM

Article image
Putting fear of Corbyn’s Labour in perspective | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to a piece by Jonathan Freedland in which he asked how Jews can vote for the Labour leader

Letters

11, Nov, 2019 @5:24 PM

Article image
How Labour can make itself electable again | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to a piece by Martin Kettle in which he says the party needs to take time for judgments to settle about its descent into the electoral abyss

Letters

05, Jan, 2020 @5:39 PM

Article image
Labour team needs new style of play to win again | Letters
Letters: readers react to Andy Beckett’s prediction that party policies might sow the seeds for success ahead

Letters

22, Dec, 2019 @6:15 PM

Article image
Andrew Sparrow's election briefing: Tony Blair wades in
Catch up with the campaign with our daily roundup

Andrew Sparrow

25, Nov, 2019 @6:58 PM

Article image
Philosophical grounding for Labour’s future path | Letters
Letters: Michael Meadowcroft on the lack of intellectual rigour in politics, Jim Grozier on Prof Jan Zielonka’s ‘neo-medievalism’, David Newens on New Labour’s successes and Bill Britten on the party’s 2019 manifesto

Letters

29, Dec, 2019 @5:11 PM