Is Theresa May’s Brexit plan a stroke of genius? | Letters

Hugo Dixon of the People’s Vote campaign on the likelihood of another referendum and other readers on recent twists and turns in the Brexit saga

It is unclear why Matthew d’Ancona thinks an election is more likely than a people’s vote if MPs reject the miserable deal that Theresa May is concocting (Logic points to a people’s vote. Instead, political collapse looms, 12 November). The Tories would be mad to call an election because they would be split from top to bottom over what to do with Brexit, the most urgent issue facing the country – and would therefore be heading for a terrible defeat.

And unless the government wants an election, there won’t be one. Boris Johnson, Jo Johnson and the DUP may fume about the deal the prime minister brings home, but none of them will join Jeremy Corbyn in a vote of no confidence against her. In the circumstances, a people’s vote is much more likely. Even the leader of the opposition will eventually come round to the idea.
Hugo Dixon
Deputy chair, People’s Vote, and chair, InFacts

• The prime minister deserves more credit than she gets. Deliberately engineering a Brexit deal that will be rejected by parliament will lead to a second referendum that will deliver a remain result. She planned this all along. Pure genius.
Martin Fowkes
Bourne End, Buckinghamshire

• Re Polly Toynbee’s article (One day we’ll wonder how these fanatics seized Britain, 13 November), there is no need to wonder: just look at the outpouring of the rightwing press for the last four decades, from the Sun’s “Up Yours, Delors!” to the Daily Mail’s “Crush the Saboteurs”, via anything written about the EU by Boris Johnson in the Daily Telegraph. Rafael Behr’s “Russian trolls” (Opinion, 13 November) were simply pushing against an open door.
Derrick Cameron
Stoke-on-Trent

• Polly Toynbee asks why Theresa May triggered article 50 with no plan. In truth, May left it until the very last minute to trigger the two-year process of article 50. She could not allow Brexit to be any later than the end of March 2019 because, from 1 April 2019, the start of the UK’s fiscal year, the EU’s anti-tax-avoidance directive (2016/1164) would apply to British citizens and institutions.
Alan Page
Stirling

• Interesting choice of word by Theresa May to describe the state of the Brexit negotiations (Time running out as May claims Brexit negotiations in ‘endgame’, 13 November). I wonder if she is familiar with the Samuel Beckett play of the same name, which posits that life is absurd, farcical and irrational. Brexit, anyone?
Mike Pender
Cardiff

• You report (Blow for May as another Johnson quits over Brexit, 10 November) that Jeremy Corbyn told Der Spiegel that Brexit can’t be stopped, saying to the German newspaper: “The referendum took place. Article 50 has been triggered. What we can do is recognise the reasons why people voted leave.”

Am I really the only person who would prefer Jeremy Corbyn to work out rather urgently why so many of us voted remain?
Angus Doulton
Bere Ferrers, Devon

• Jeremy Corbyn’s unwillingness to stand against Brexit is, in my view, unforgivable. Like many, I’ve tried to find a workaround so I can accept his obdurate refusal to speak out. But I can’t find a way to overlook his shameful non-stance against this disaster.

No matter what strategic reasons are given, like not alienating Labour Brexit voters, especially those in less affluent areas, or holding out for a general election after everything falls apart, they do not justify his stubborn inability to resist an action about to destabilise the UK.

Polly Toynbee suggests it’s his 1970s Brexit self at work. That’s the problem. Not changing your mind in 50 years is less a strength than a sign of blinkered inflexibility. Times have changed and Corbyn’s Brexit blindness demonstrates how little he understands contemporary realities.
Rose Levinson
London

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Chequers Brexit summit only muddies the water | Letters
Letters: SP Chakravarty says the Chequers agreement puts negotiators on both sides of the Channel at a disadvantage; Laurence Williamson writes that Tony Benn’s ‘red lines’ must inform Corbyn’s position on Brexit; plus letters from a group of MEPs, Colleen Darby and Peter Fellows

Letters

08, Jul, 2018 @4:08 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Mrs May’s Brexit: blocked by naysayers | Editorial
Editorial: The prime minister has squandered opportunities to build bridges across parliament and is now paying a heavy price

Editorial

09, Nov, 2018 @5:32 PM

Article image
May’s cynical Brexit vote delay all about her keeping power | Letters
Letters: Guardian readers share their views on the trials and tribulations of the Conservatives’ Brexit plans

Letters

11, Dec, 2018 @5:51 PM

Article image
Potential consequences of Corbyn’s Brexit pledge | Letters
Letters: Jeremy Corbyn’s promise to press ahead with Brexit could boost the Tories’ election prospects, says John Ellis. Plus views from Christopher Clayton, John Bold, Roger Fletcher, Michael Bath, Paul Turner and David Beere

Letters

23, Dec, 2018 @5:17 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Theresa May’s victory: a pyrrhic success built on fantasy | Editorial
Editorial: Mrs May will have her work cut out to wrangle a new Brexit deal in Brussels, especially as her plans to reopen it have been rejected

Editorial

29, Jan, 2019 @9:43 PM

Article image
Problems posed by a second Brexit referendum | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to an article by Steve Richards about the possibility of a second referendum

Letters

06, Aug, 2018 @4:34 PM

Article image
Cross-party cooperation is the only way forward on Brexit | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to Theresa May’s survival of the coup attempt against her by members of her own party

Letters

13, Dec, 2018 @4:48 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Labour and Brexit: lead the debate | Editorial
Editorial: The Tory leadership contest is closing down space for compromise. The opposition must make the case for Britain’s European alliance

Editorial

26, Jun, 2019 @5:48 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on May’s Brexit offer to Corbyn: years too late | Editorial
Editorial: The prime minister’s offer to Labour’s leader seems designed to share the blame rather than the glory

Editorial

02, Apr, 2019 @7:21 PM

Article image
Theresa May’s lack of human empathy | Letters
Letters: She was not in touch with the basic needs and feelings of ordinary people, writes Joe McCarthy; while Henry Gold says her reliably fierce partisanship was the least of the qualities required for a divided country; James Gordon says launching a consultation is not the same as actually achieving something

Letters

22, Jul, 2019 @4:46 PM