Problems posed by a second Brexit referendum | Letters

Readers respond to an article by Steve Richards about the possibility of a second referendum

With the conference season approaching, it is becoming alarmingly clear that the only people capable of stopping Brexit are the delegates to this year’s Labour party conference.

Steve Richards (Here is the one way to end Theresa May’s Brexit gridlock, 3 August) sets out a terrifying, but all too likely scenario, where May faces down the Johnson/Rees-Mogg faction by holding a new referendum on a simple “My deal or no deal” choice, leaving remainers with no option except a spoilt ballot paper.

This plan fits with Patrick Wintour and Peter Walker’s article (Remain concerns at ‘German face-saving’ plan for blind Brexit, 2 August), where despairing EU negotiators agree to let the details of a deal muddle on past the leave deadline, so May’s “My deal” would in reality be “trust me to continue working to get this right” after having castrated her opponents.

Assuming she isn’t deposed, her only other option to win the authority she needs would be a general election, but that would be a far riskier strategy and would not resolve the internal party conflict that led to this mess in the first place.

So what can remainers do? The majority of Labour MPs and party members want to remain in the EU and work with other progressives to resolve the issues that caused the Brexit vote. But so far, Labour’s policy has accepted the referendum result as a tablet of stone and the leadership shows no sign of rejecting the myth of a “Jobs Brexit”.

So this year’s Labour conference may be the last chance to stop Brexit. Delegates could force Jeremy Corbyn to oppose the concept of Brexit and adopt a “remain and reform” policy to fight May’s economically suicidal survival strategy. Will they have the courage?
Christopher Rainger

• We remainers lost the Brexit referendum, and we can’t really expect a rerun of essentially the same question because we didn’t like the result. The “three-choice referendum” proposal that has been commonly proposed recently – with “May deal”, “No deal”, or “Remain” options – is therefore not a realistic way forward, not least because it would split the Brexit vote as has been pointed out elsewhere.

However, we could legitimately hold a further referendum with three choices that all still entail Brexit in the strictest sense, ie leaving the EU, if the three options were “May deal”, “No deal” or “EEA membership” – the so-called Norway option.

Of course none of these are ideal to everyone but at least the last one would be comprehensible to our friends in the EU.
Nigel Shindler

• Steve Richards makes a strong case for a second referendum, once a Brexit deal is finalised, giving a simple choice of voting to accept this deal, or voting to leave the EU without a deal.

But what if it produces a majority for “no deal”? To my mind for the government to allow this option, which flies in the face of what they believe would be in the interest of the UK, would be hugely irresponsible. It would seriously undermine our democracy. Why should the public have confidence in a parliament unwilling to speak for the country? And what if my neighbour, along with millions of others, were to vote for us crashing out of the EU, and as a consequence I lose my job? Do I get angry with that neighbour? What redress would I have? Whereas if parliament makes the decision, I can vent my dissatisfaction by protesting and campaigning against the MPs or the party responsible. I fear a second referendum might prove even more divisive than the first.
John Boaler
Calne, Wiltshire

• I can assure Steve Richards that remainers like myself would boycott a “deal or no deal” referendum in droves – and very noisily. The result of such a vote – with probably less than 20% of those entitled to vote supporting the winning option – would only call deeper into question the democratic credentials of the whole Brexit project. Certainly it could hardly be said to reflect “the will of the people”.
Tim Shelton-Jones

• Join the debate – email

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit

• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with other Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread in our print edition


The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Chequers Brexit summit only muddies the water | Letters
Letters: SP Chakravarty says the Chequers agreement puts negotiators on both sides of the Channel at a disadvantage; Laurence Williamson writes that Tony Benn’s ‘red lines’ must inform Corbyn’s position on Brexit; plus letters from a group of MEPs, Colleen Darby and Peter Fellows


08, Jul, 2018 @4:08 PM

Article image
Potential consequences of Corbyn’s Brexit pledge | Letters
Letters: Jeremy Corbyn’s promise to press ahead with Brexit could boost the Tories’ election prospects, says John Ellis. Plus views from Christopher Clayton, John Bold, Roger Fletcher, Michael Bath, Paul Turner and David Beere


23, Dec, 2018 @5:17 PM

Article image
Should there be a second Brexit referendum? | Letters
Letters: Readers air their views after Justine Greening said she believes other senior Conservative MPs also support the idea of a second referendum to end a likely parliamentary deadlock on Brexit


17, Jul, 2018 @4:43 PM

Article image
Is Theresa May’s Brexit plan a stroke of genius? | Letters
Letters: Hugo Dixon of the People’s Vote campaign on the likelihood of another referendum and other readers on recent twists and turns in the Brexit saga


13, Nov, 2018 @6:06 PM

Article image
Cross-party cooperation is the only way forward on Brexit | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to Theresa May’s survival of the coup attempt against her by members of her own party


13, Dec, 2018 @4:48 PM

Article image
Leaving Europe: power to the people, or an impossible dream? | Letters
Letters: Michael Knowles says parliament has employed every conceivable device available to sabotage the result of the 2016 referendum, but Roy Boffy thinks Brexit was always likely to end up as a tangled mess of knots


09, Apr, 2019 @4:51 PM

Article image
The value of a customs union and striking deals | Letters
Letters: Richard Tudway says Britain is a small bit in a much bigger picture, Martin London thinks the country is run by salesmen, David Lawrence addresses the Irish border, Christopher Clayton and Brian Willan have different takes on Michael Morpurgo’s Brexit perspective, David Beake says cooking up a deal with a Marxist is nothing new, Haydn Thomas thinks the Commons should be turned into a museum and Ros Jones sees the funny side of Anish Kapoor’s latest artwork


05, Apr, 2019 @3:43 PM

Article image
Brexit’s impact on local elections | Letters
Letters: Colin Montgomery wants ministers to admit that the effects of Brexit will be felt for years. Les Bright says negotiating teams should clear their diaries and make a compromise


03, May, 2019 @3:55 PM

Article image
Trying to keep our heads amid Brexit chaos | Letters
Letters: Readers respond air their views on turbulent times in British politics


17, Jan, 2019 @5:50 PM

Article image
Labour’s next steps in Brexit chaos are crucial | Letters
Letters: Jon Bloomfield says the party cannot absent itself from the choice lying before the country, Chris Donnison addresses nationalism and Frank Land debates the shifting will of the people. Plus letters from Carol Hedges, Jean Johnston, Philip Lodge and Martin Lamb


18, Nov, 2018 @5:37 PM