‘Dark money’ is threat to integrity of UK elections, say leading academics

Call to reform electoral law as new fears emerge over role of foreign donations in referendum campaign

An urgent review of “weak and helpless” electoral laws is being demanded by a group of leading academics who say that uncontrolled “dark money” poses a threat to the fundamental principles of British democracy.

A working group set up by the London School of Economics warns that new technology has disrupted British politics to such an extent that current laws are unable to ensure a free and fair election or control the influence of money in politics.

Damian Tambini, director of the media policy project at the LSE, who heads the group made up of leading experts in the field, said that new forms of online campaigning had not only changed the ways that political parties target voters but, crucially, had also altered the ability of big money interests to manipulate political debate. “There is a real danger we are heading down the US route where whoever spends the most money is most likely to win. That’s why we’ve always controlled spending in this country. But these controls are no longer working.”

Its policy brief published on Saturday concludes that current laws can no longer ensure the fundamental principle of a “level playing field”, or guard against foreign influence, and that parliament urgently needs to review UK electoral law.

It comes as questions continue to be asked about spending during the referendum campaign. In an interview published in Sunday’s Observer New Review, Arron Banks, the founder of the Leave.eu campaign, says: “We were just cleverer than the regulators and the politicians. Of course we were.”

The Electoral Commission is investigating whether work that the data analytics firm Cambridge Analytica may have done for Leave.eu constitutes an undeclared donation from an impermissible foreign donor. Cambridge Analytica is majority owned by the hedge fund billionaire Robert Mercer, who bankrolled Donald Trump. Filings from the White House disclosed on Friday that Steve Bannon, Donald Trump’s strategy chief, was paid $125,333 by the firm last year.

Asked whether he was worried about the Electoral Commission’s investigation into Leave.eu, Banks said: “I don’t give a monkey’s about the Electoral Commission.”

Banks also claimed that Vote Leave “cheated” to get around campaign financing rules by donating money to third party campaigns. “They cheated! They gave 650 grand to a student. Come on! They absolutely, 100% cheated.”

A spokesman for Vote Leave responded: “The Electoral Commission gave us a clean bill of health.”

Privately, the commission admitted that the only penalties it was allowed to impose by law offered no deterrent to political parties, particularly in a one-off referendum. In addition, the LSE found that loopholes in electoral law mean that spending by political parties during the referendum was almost entirely unregulated or even recorded. The real cost of the campaign – building databases to target voters via social media – occurred almost entirely outside the period regulated by law.

Tambini said: “We don’t have a system that is working any more. In this country, we have had laws to control spending by political campaigns but online campaigning has changed everything and none of the existing laws cover it. The ability to throw around large amounts of cash is almost completely uncontrolled. The key costs in campaigning – building the databases – is happening during the period when campaign spending is not regulated at all.

“There is a real danger that public trust in the democratic process will be lost. There is real potential for foreign influence. We have now the ability to manipulate public opinion on a level we have never seen before. And the current framework is weak and helpless.”

The Electoral Commission has not yet made any public statement but privately it said: “We did have this environment that guaranteed a level playing field. But with the shift online that has all changed. We won’t be able to limit the power of money in elections, that’s what we’re very concerned about.”

Tambini said: “It is urgent. There could be a wholesale loss of trust in the process as the result of a scandal or swinging of an election. Though some would argue that has already happened. There has to be a principle of transparency. The public needs to know where the money is coming from. And we don’t.”

Martin Moore, director of the Centre for the Study of Media, Communication and Power, at King’s College London, said the machinery of campaigning had changed so rapidly, the law has had no chance to catch up. “The first election where digital made a difference was in 2008. And now it’s where pretty much all the spending is. It has been a shift that has happened in less than 10 years. What we’re seeing is exactly the same sort of disruption that we’ve seen in news and music and other industries.

“That is exactly what is happening in politics. The problem is that if you disrupt politics, you are also disrupting the democratic process and you are creating a very dangerous or volatile situation.”

In addition, the Electoral Commission said privately that it did not have the resources to monitor campaigns in real time. “It’s just not practical. There is some proactive stuff that we can do but we simply don’t have the resources.” The only action it can take is once the campaign is over and then the only penalties are fines which “campaigns can simply cost into their spends”.


Carole Cadwalladr

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Steve Bannon hails Dominic Cummings and predicts lurch to right for No 10
Architect of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign reveals admiration for Boris Johnson’s aide in interview on dark politics

Mark Townsend

01, Aug, 2020 @12:10 PM

Article image
Revealed: how US billionaire helped to back Brexit
Robert Mercer, who bankrolled Donald Trump, played key role with ‘sinister’ advice on using Facebook data

Carole Cadwalladr

26, Feb, 2017 @12:04 AM

Article image
Farage: Bannon plan could help populists to EU election victory
Ex-Ukip leader predicts sweeping advances for anti-EU parties in May 2019

Mark Townsend Home affairs editor

29, Jul, 2018 @7:00 AM

Article image
Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach
Whistleblower describes how firm linked to former Trump adviser Steve Bannon compiled user data to target American voters

Carole Cadwalladr and Emma Graham-Harrison

17, Mar, 2018 @10:03 PM

Article image
Tory donor with past Russia links facing forgery charges in Luxembourg
Former Formula One team boss Gérard López, who gave £400,000 to Conservatives, has been charged after investigation

Jon Ungoed-Thomas

26, Jun, 2022 @9:00 AM

Article image
Elections bill is ‘a power grab to rig polls in favour of Tories’
Charities and unions slam move as an attack on fundamental rights

Toby Helm

05, Sep, 2021 @7:15 AM

Article image
Major Tory donor investigated over fraud and money laundering allegations
Indian rice tycoon Karan Chanana, who gave the Conservatives more than £220,000, is under scrutiny by India’s finance ministry

Jon Ungoed-Thomas and Solomon Hughes

20, May, 2023 @6:00 PM

Article image
Theresa May faces revolt of leading Tory donors
Sir John Hall says party will be ‘decimated’ unless prime minister ‘takes bull by horns’

Michael Savage Policy editor

11, Feb, 2018 @7:48 AM

Article image
British science will not flourish outside EU’s Horizon scheme, academics warn
Experts insist successes of Brussels’ €95bn programme could never be replicated by a UK-only substitute

Robin McKie and Toby Helm

09, Apr, 2023 @9:00 AM

Article image
UK elections watchdog calls for bigger fines for rule breaches
Electoral Commission chief says £20,000 limit means breaches seen as ‘cost of doing business’

Dan Sabbagh

15, May, 2018 @12:57 PM