Government drug adviser David Nutt sacked

Professor David Nutt asked to resign after his claims that ecstasy and LSD were less dangerous than alcohol

Professor David Nutt, the government's chief drug adviser, has been sacked a day after claiming that ecstasy and LSD were less dangerous than alcohol.

Nutt incurred the wrath of the government when he claimed in a paper that alcohol and tobacco were more harmful than many illegal drugs, including LSD, ecstasy and cannabis.

A Home Office spokesperson said: "The home secretary has asked Professor Nutt to resign as chair of the ACMD [Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs].

"In a letter he [Alan Johnson] expressed surprise and disappointment over Professor Nutt's comments which damage efforts to give the public clear messages about the dangers of drugs.

"We remain determined to crack down on all illegal substances and minimise their harm to health and society as a whole."

Nutt had criticised politicians for "distorting" and "devaluing" the research evidence in the debate over illicit drugs.

Arguing that some "top" scientific journals had published "horrific examples" of poor quality research on the alleged harm caused by some illicit drugs, the Imperial College professor called for a new way of classifying the harm caused by both legal and illegal drugs.

"Alcohol ranks as the fifth most harmful drug after heroin, cocaine, barbiturates and methadone. Tobacco is ranked ninth," he wrote in the paper from the centre for crime and justice studies at King's College, London, published yesterday.

"Cannabis, LSD and ecstasy, while harmful, are ranked lower at 11, 14 and 18 respectively."

Nutt said tonight he was disappointed by the decision but linked it to "political" considerations. "It's unusual political times, I suppose, elections and all that. It's disappointing," he told Sky News. "But politics is politics and science is science and there's a bit of a tension between them sometimes."

Nutt clashed with Jacqui Smith when she was home secretary after he compared the 100 deaths a year from horseriding with the 30 deaths a year linked to ecstasy.

Smith also ignored the recommendation of Nutt's advisory committee that cannabis should not be reclassified from class C back to class B, leading to heavier penalties.

He criticised Smith's use of the "precautionary principle" to justify her decision to reclassify cannabis and said that by erring on the side of caution politicians "distort" and "devalue" the research evidence.

"This leads us to a position where people really don't know what the evidence is," he said adding that the initial decision to downgrade the classification of cannabis led to a fall in the use of the drug.

Nutt acknowledged there was a "relatively small risk" of psychotic illness linked to cannabis use. But he argued that to prevent one episode of schizophrenia it would be necessary to "stop 5,000 men aged 20 to 25 from ever using" cannabis.

Nutt also renewed his support for reclassifying ecstasy from a class A drug to class B, saying the advisory committee "won the intellectual argument" over the issue but obviously didn't win the decision after the home secretary vetoed the move.

He said the quality of some research papers about cannabis and ecstasy was so poor the articles had to be retracted.

Richard Garside, director of the centre for crime and justice, said Nutt's briefing paper gave an insight into what drugs policy might look like if it was based on the research evidence rather than political or moral positioning.

Garside added: "I'm shocked and dismayed that the home secretary appears to believe that political calculation trumps honest and informed scientific opinion. The message is that when it comes to the Home Office's relationship with the research community honest researchers should be seen but not heard.

"The home secretary's action is a bad day for science and a bad day for the cause of evidence-informed policy making."

Contributor

Mark Tran

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Chief drug adviser David Nutt sacked over cannabis stance
Alan Johnson has sacked Professor David Nutt after the scientist renewed his criticism of the government's drug policies

Alan Travis

30, Oct, 2009 @7:41 PM

Article image
Drugs adviser quits over David Nutt cannabis row
Les King resigns from drugs advisory council over government sacking of its head, but reports of second member's resignation unconfirmed

Sam Jones

01, Nov, 2009 @4:35 PM

Article image
David Nutt's dangerous drug list
How harmful are the drugs on the list drawn up by the ousted government drugs adviser and his colleagues?

Owen Bowcott

02, Nov, 2009 @3:58 PM

David Nutt row referred to chief scientific adviser
Professor John Beddington to report to PM on freedom of drug advisers to publicly criticise government policy

Alan Travis

11, Nov, 2009 @7:40 PM

Article image
Alcohol worse than ecstasy - drugs chief
Professor David Nutt criticised politicians for 'distorting' and 'devaluing' the research evidence on illicit drugs

Alan Travis, home affairs editor

29, Oct, 2009 @12:05 AM

Drugs adviser says sorry over ecstasy article

The home secretary demanded an apology from Dr David Nutt after he said that taking ecstasy was no riskier than riding a horse

Alan Travis, home affairs editor

10, Feb, 2009 @12:01 AM

Article image
‘Curb drink culture’ says drugs expert David Nutt
New restrictions needed for leading cause of deaths of men under 50

Jamie Doward

20, Oct, 2019 @8:12 AM

Article image
David Nutt: my views on drugs classification

David Nutt, the government's former chief drugs adviser, on how he formulated his controversial views on drugs

David Nutt

03, Nov, 2009 @12:05 AM

Article image
Ease rules on research into psychedelic drugs, urges David Nutt
Ex-government adviser says substances such as psilocybin could have medical value

Nicola Davis

02, Apr, 2020 @2:00 PM

Article image
Drugs legislation is hampering clinical research, warns David Nutt
Former government drugs adviser says progress towards new treatments for pain, Parkinson's and depression being blocked

Alok Jha, science correspondent

04, Nov, 2013 @7:09 PM