Law Lords affirm protester rights

Lord Chancellor upholds Stonehenge case plea

Protesters have a legal right to assemble on public roadsides for peaceful demonstrations, the law lords ruled yesterday.

By a three-two majority, they held that two demonstrators at Stonehenge were wrongly convicted of 'trespassory assembly', an offence introduced by the 1994 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act.

The act introduced a power for chief constables to ban assemblies of 20 or more people which exceeded 'the limits of the public's right of access'. The courts stated in earlier cases that the public had a right of access to public roads only for travelling.

Yesterday Lord Irvine, the Lord Chancellor, Lord Hutton and Lord Clyde held that there was a right to use the roads for peaceful, non-obstructive protest. However, Lord Clyde said it was not an absolute right but would depend on the nature, extent and duration of the protest. Lord Irvine, who has the right to sit as a judge in the Lords, was giving his second judgment since taking office nearly two years ago. Some legal minds believe that as a Cabinet minister he should be disqualified from the bench.

The ruling was a victory for Margaret Jones, a university lecturer, and Richard Lloyd, a student, who took part in a peaceful roadside demonstration at Stonehenge in Wiltshire in June 1995. In anticipation of the 10th anniversary of the 'Battle of the Beanfield', a confrontation between travellers and police, the chief constable of Wiltshire obtained an order banning assemblies of 20 or more.

The police estimated that 21 had gathered to demonstrate for the right of access to the ancient stones. Dr Jones and Mr Lloyd were arrested when they refused to move on, convicted by Salisbury magistrates, and then cleared by Salisbury crown court, which ruled that any peaceful and non-obstructive assembly was lawful.

The Crown Prosecution Service appealed, and in 1997 the High Court allowed the appeal, ruling that the prosecution need only prove that the assembly consisted of 20 or more and the protesters knew it was prohibited.

Allowing an appeal by Dr Jones and Mr Lloyd, Lord Irvine concluded that 'the public highway is a public place which the public may enjoy for any reasonable purpose, provided the activity in question does not amount to a public or private nuisance and does not obstruct the highway . . there is a public right of peaceful assembly'. Lord Irvine added that, for roads on private land, the laws of trespass protected owners.

Dissenting, Lord Slynn said the law clearly restricted public rights on highways to the right to 'passage and reasonable incidental uses'.

Lord Hope, also dissenting, said accepting a right of peaceful protest would 'affect the position of every private owner of land throughout the country over which there is a public right of way'.


By Clare Dyer, Legal Correspondent

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Stonehenge protester King Arthur Pendragon defies eviction order

Druid formerly known as John Rothwell vows to continue with protest until Stonehenge is open to all

Staff and agencies

03, May, 2009 @4:35 PM

Article image
Fathers' rights protester scales parliament

Staff and agencies

27, Sep, 2005 @5:50 PM

Lords back gay adoption rights
Campaigners for homosexual rights unexpectedly triumphed last night in the House of Lords when peers voted by 215 to 184, a majority of 21, to give homosexual and unmarried heterosexual couples the right to adopt.

Patrick Wintour, chief political correspondent

06, Nov, 2002 @4:34 PM

Paul Foot: Rights in the Lords' hands
Paul Foot: Things have come to a pretty pass when, under a Labour government, the fight against a new attack on trade union rights is left to a small old Labour band in the House of Lords.

Paul Foot

15, Oct, 2003 @8:04 AM

Lords uphold gays' tenancy rights
The rights of gays to take over tenancies when their spouses die was upheld by the law lords yesterday.

Press Association

22, Jun, 2004 @1:27 AM

Letters: Lords are defending our historic rights
You write that Labour must "ensure Tories never again use their unelected majority in the second chamber to wreck a programme coming from Labour's elected majority", which reads like the authentic voice of Lord Falconer (Leaders, March 22).

24, Mar, 2004 @2:32 AM

Article image
My advice to Brexiteer: it’s better to drink cask beer | Brief letters
Brief letters: Stonehenge tunnel | Lager v beer | Highway Code for cyclists | Under the weather | Buttered Weetabix | Insinuate, imply or infer


13, Jan, 2017 @6:54 PM

Article image
Why ruin Stonehenge to shave a few seconds off a car trip? | Tom Holland
Driving a £2bn dual carriageway through one of Europe’s most precious prehistoric sites would be an act of cultural vandalism

Tom Holland

07, Sep, 2019 @6:00 PM

Article image
Stonehenge £2bn road tunnel project funding uncertain, MPs warn
Public accounts committee says plan at mercy of spending review delayed by Brexit

Steven Morris

02, Jul, 2019 @11:01 PM

Article image
Monumental issues around Stonehenge | Letters
Letters: Malcolm Reading says it is more likely that ancient Greece and Rome, rather than Stonehenge, were the inspiration for The Circus in Bath, John Bailey wonders whether Chris Grayling is the right person to resolve road planning issues around the monument, Phil Turner says the need for the military training area nearby is questionable, and Mark Lyall wonders whether a relocation of the stones would be easier


11, Feb, 2019 @6:02 PM