Money talks: why is selling out OK now?

It’s an argument that’s raged for decades, taking in everyone from the Who to Nirvana to the Spice Girls, but a recalibration of what that term means has changed everything

In the Guide’s weekly Solved! column, we look into a crucial pop-culture question you’ve been burning to know the answer to – and settle it

In 1992, Kurt Cobain told Rolling Stone: “I don’t blame the average 17-year-old punk-rock kid for calling me a sellout.” Nirvana had moved from indie label Sub Pop to Geffen, a major, to release Nevermind. “And maybe when they grow up a little bit, they’ll realise there’s more things to life than living out your rock’n’roll identity too righteously.” As ever, Cobain was right: three decades on, bellyaching about integrity is outdated when ethics don’t pay the rent.

The argument over selling out is as old as pop itself. Everyone was at it in the 60s (the Rolling Stones shilled Rice Krispies), as satirised by the Who on 1967’s The Who Sell Out. A decade later, punk poked at it from all angles: the Sex Pistols, for example, were a provocatively commercial confection. The 80s were more hardline, the decade’s excesses making integrity a crucial point of difference. Old-timers backed their cause: “Ain’t singin’ for Pepsi, ain’t singing for Coke,” Neil Young sang in 1988.

Orthodoxy inevitably inspires contrarianism. Lou Reed was unapologetic about his 1985 Honda ad; in 1989, Sonic Youth left indie Enigma for Geffen, lured by greater creative freedom. They inspired Teenage Fanclub, Beck and Nirvana to follow suit. The latter’s success prompted the grunge boom, a honeymoon period when alternative acts could make major cash. Indie label Matador partnered with Atlantic, then Capitol. Motörhead hawked Pot Noodle.

No Stones left unturned ... the Who.
No Stones left unturned ... the Who. Photograph: Pictorial Press/Alamy

Teen pop – primarily the Spice Girls’ rise – briefly made selling out objectionable. But Y2K ad execs embraced their tastemaking potential: Gap had Run DMC and Low; Levi’s made Mr Oizo’s Flat Eric famous; Apple and mobile phone companies exposed the mainstream to Feist, the Dandy Warhols and Arthur Russell. Moby, famously, synced every track from his 1999 album Play. Starbucks sold millions of CDs, and a pre-teen Taylor Swift aspired to see her music sold there (it was). Venue and festival corporatisation meant even commercial holdouts were likely to perform in front of a beer logo.

Then came the ravages of Napster. Indie became less stance than (woolly) genre, and hipster gatekeeping was derided. By the 2010s, any flak around selling out was directed at companies ripping off indie hits without paying the songwriters. Rage at the emergent Lana Del Rey for pairing indie aesthetics with major label money swiftly looked very silly.

Perhaps the most significant recalibration of what it meant to sell out was rap ascending to total cultural dominance, its often aspirational, entrepreneurial mindset inspiring respect among fans. Artists with a sense of humour embraced advertising’s pop-cultural potential, as when producer Sophie let McDonald’s use Lemonade.

It’s not a total free-for-all – Clean Bandit were mocked for their excruciating 2015 Microsoft Cortana ad – but, short of performing for dictators, selling out lost its sting, especially given that streaming revenues were hardly lucrative. These days you’re more likely to get cancelled for being a snob about a musician’s finances than they are for accepting a payday. Telegraph your loyalty to the cause by purchasing a Ramones T-shirt from Marks and Spencer.

Contributor

Laura Snapes

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The show must go on: can a band continue without its lead singer?
From Queen to the Doors, many bands have attempted to keep going after the departure of the singer – with very mixed results

Leonie Cooper

02, Nov, 2020 @1:00 PM

Article image
What constitutes 'classic rock'?
This week we investigate the slippery definition of a music genre according to sound, popularity and the passing of time

Jumi Akinfenwa

14, Sep, 2020 @12:00 PM

Article image
What ended Britpop: Oasis, Diana or Euro 96?
A quarter of a century on, debate still rages about the demise of the lager-loving scene. But who was the real culprit?

Matt Charlton

12, Oct, 2020 @12:00 PM

Article image
Chapter and verse: what makes the perfect lyric?
From Nick Cave to Courtney Love, brilliant songwriters use a host of techniques to make the listener think, feel, and – in the case of Enya – sail away

Leonie Cooper

05, Jul, 2021 @12:00 PM

Article image
Piercing feedback and pig noises: what's the most out-there album ever?
Defying tradition and bothering the mainstream, the likes of John Cage, Matthew Herbert, Laurie Anderson and Lou Reed battle it out for the best of the bizarre

Daniel Dylan Wray

01, Mar, 2021 @1:00 PM

Article image
Repeat offenders: what is the most overplayed song?
It has to be an omnipresent, year-round stinker. So which is it?

Luke Holland

31, May, 2021 @12:00 PM

Article image
Who is the planet's biggest pop star?
This week, we investigate whether one lone superstar can shine brightest in a constantly shifting pop landscape

Michael Cragg

20, Jul, 2020 @12:00 PM

Article image
All doom and boom: what’s the heaviest music ever made?
From Swans to Sunn O))), heavy music isn’t just about volume – it’s about atmosphere, intent and bowel-rupturing physicality

Dom Lawson

24, Nov, 2020 @1:00 PM

Article image
Clapton, Hendrix, Spinal Tap: which is the best ever guitar solo?
Overblown musical pomposity to some, the guitar solo is seen as a benchmark of brilliance to many. But which is best?

JR Moores

26, Apr, 2021 @12:00 PM

Article image
What’s the most important part of a song: melody or lyrics?
While the two are often inextricably entwined, there can only be one winner when it comes to a song’s vital ingredient

Niall Doherty

23, Aug, 2021 @12:00 PM