Mahler/Carpenter: Symphony No 10 – review

Tonhalle O Zurich/Zinman
(RCA)

As if determined to be the exception that proves the general rule, David Zinman closes his very fine Mahler cycle, one of the finest on disc in recent years, not with a recording of Cooke's version of the 10th, but with what was the earliest of all attempts to make a performing continuity of Mahler's final work by the American musicologist Clinton Carpenter, who began his "completion" in 1946 and finished it in 1966, though it was only performed 17 years later. It's a far more interventionist version than anything Cooke attempted, with textures regularly thickened and extra instrumental voices added, as Carpenter tries to second guess what Mahler might have added to the torso had he lived to see the symphony through to performance.

It's all entirely speculative, of course, but the main problem with Carpenter's version seems to me the fact that a number of passages just don't sound convincingly like late Mahler at all – the harmony has been enriched too much and the instrumentation bulked up, so it often seems like a step back from the spareness so characteristic of the sound worlds of the Ninth Symphony and Das Lied von der Erde, the other two works left unperformed in manuscript at Mahler's death. As you would expect, though Zinman and his orchestra play it wonderfully, and their accounts of the two movements that were completed, the opening Adagio and the third, the Purgatorio, are superb, but otherwise Carpenter's version can't really be recommended to anyone wanting a recording of Mahler's final musical testament.

Contributor

Andrew Clements

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Mahler: Symphony No 3 - review
Jonathan Nott's account of Mahler's Third with his Bamberg orchestra starts and ends well, but is not perfect, writes Andrew Clements

Andrew Clements

02, Jun, 2011 @8:30 PM

Mahler: Symphony No 3 – review
The orchestral playing is as good as any, but Jansons's interpretation can't stand up against the great benchmark recordings, writes Andrew Clements

Andrew Clements

04, Aug, 2011 @9:50 PM

Mahler: Symphony No 6 – review
Antonio Pappano's recording may not be to everyone's taste, but this pulverising, warts-and-all Sixth really gets under your skin, writes Tim Ashley

Tim Ashley

05, Jan, 2012 @10:30 PM

Mahler: Symphony No 4 – review
Philippe Herreweghe's finely judged account of the Fourth Symphony tries to do it like Mahler would have done it, writes Andrew Clements

Andrew Clements

03, Feb, 2011 @10:25 PM

Mahler: Symphony No 9 – review
Zinman's reappraisal of Mahler may not appeal to everyone, but this superbly controlled performance sounds near faultless to Tim Ashley

Tim Ashley

13, Jan, 2011 @9:45 PM

Mahler: Symphony No 2 – review
Simon Rattle's latest account of the Resurrection Symphony, although analytical, doesn't transcend his original Mahler cycle, writes Andrew Clements

Andrew Clements

24, Feb, 2011 @10:15 PM

Mahler: Symphony No 8 – review
There may be more refined versions of Mahler's gargantuan work put on disc, but I wouldn't wait for them, says Andrew Clements

Andrew Clements

03, Mar, 2011 @9:45 PM

Mahler/Cooke: Symphony No 10 – review
This is an utterly compelling behind-the-scenes look at Deryck Cooke's assemblage of Mahler's unfinished work, writes Andrew Clements

Andrew Clements

27, Jan, 2011 @10:10 PM

Mahler: Symphony No 9 – review
There are plenty of good discoveries to be made in Gergiev's interpretation, but the finale doesn't move as it should, writes Tim Ashley

Tim Ashley

08, Sep, 2011 @9:00 PM

Mahler: Symphony No 2 | CD review
Detail and precision are fine, but not at the expense of dramatic momentum, which is why this account of Mahler is underwhelming, says Andrew Clements

Andrew Clements

22, Jul, 2010 @9:45 PM