Tom Ewing | A pantomime of pop, politicians and David Cameron's iPod

The urge to snigger at politicians' pop moves is a residue of a wider idea – that the natural state of pop is one in which establishment figures don't listen to it

From hustings ambushes to subverted ads, a British election comes with plenty of sideshows and nine-tweet wonders. Among the most reliable is the apparent misuse of pop music by politicians. It comes in three varieties: the unlikely claim to relevance; the outrageous song appropriation; and the misplaced lyric sheet. This week we got two of them in a single day, with Gordon Brown expressing his admiration for the "brilliant" Glee, and Keane stamping their feet crossly on learning that the Tories had launched their manifesto to the strains of Everybody's Changing. So we await only a lyrical gaffe to complete the set, along the lines of Brown using an old James hit to introduce his conference speech last year, unaware of the line: "Those who find themselves ridiculous, sit down next to me."

Sometimes these stories evoke sympathy, sometimes not. If you make music for some nebulous everyman, your squeaks of dismay when said everyman turns out to include Tory researchers may go unheeded. Really, though, the stories are a kind of pantomime: everyone trotting through the roles provided them. We all tut or laugh at the lazy parties and their obvious song choices, we all agree to pretend for a day that anyone remembers the lyrics to Sit Down or Movin' On Up beyond the title. We know that the prime minister doesn't have to care about Gaga v Madonna, and he knows we know, and we know that too, and everyone plays along with the whole awkward situation when he's asked who he prefers – and pop assumes its role is as a ready supply of minor political banana skins.

But why is it so awkward? After all, we're now well into the era when almost everyone entering British politics will be – or will have been – a music fan of some kind, but people still pounce on a politician's taste in pop culture as if it were cellulite on a starlet's bum. In the days before the Sun backed David Cameron, its report on his attendance at a Killers show included a fan suggesting he should be banned from all gigs, "except for Il Divo". But I've DJed at weddings full of fortysomething public schoolboys, and guess what – they all love the Killers! Indeed, Cameron's music taste is probably the most believable thing about him.

From a distance, other countries can seem more settled about politicians' tastes than we are. In the late 80s the NME ran an excited interview with Jack Lang, the French culture minister. The "Minister for Rock" – as the paper depicted him – was genial, sensible and perhaps slightly baffled at being presented as the political equivalent of a Martian. He was in charge of music: he liked music – no problem, surely. In 1992, Bill Clinton turned his presidential bid around by explicitly identifying himself with rock'n'roll and with Elvis – a process mapped in Greil Marcus's fine book Double Trouble. But Tony Blair's rock past never seemed much of an electoral asset, and his pop present was a source of mockery as soon as Noel Gallagher stepped over the Downing Street threshold in search of canapes.

There has been a tonal shift between the mocking of Cool Britannia and the interest in Cameron's iPod, though. People don't really doubt the Tory leader's tastes, they just wish he didn't have them. The urge to snigger at politicians' pop moves is a residue of a wider idea – that the natural state of pop is one in which politicians (and bankers, and admen, and other establishment figures) don't listen to it. But obviously they do, and have done for a long time. Still, the embarrassment people feel when the establishment nods at its embrace of rock comes out in the pantomime reactions to it.

So the idea of the misuse of pop in politics narrows to the notion that politicians do not listen to the right bits of pop music, or not in the right way. And the separation of pop and the establishment isn't based on anything other than the idea they should be separate. But there's a simpler way to manage this issue: if people really do want a culture where the political classes can't try to use pop as a tool, they should probably reward pop that isn't quite so likeable.

Contributor

Tom Ewing

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Why did David Bowie scupper the idea of an O2 musical?
Tom Ewing: Glam, new-wave sci-fi, neurotic lushness – the problem with making a preposterous 'jukebox musical' about Bowie is that he's done it all already

Tom Ewing

01, Dec, 2011 @10:01 PM

Tom Ewing | The Weeknd and indie
The Weeknd's suggestion that there's an awfulness at the heart of VIP area hedonism is always going to delight the indie crowd

Tom Ewing

24, Mar, 2011 @10:30 PM

Article image
Beyond music: Pop stars in the transmedia age | Tom Ewing
Many of today's top pop stars are transmedia operators to some degree, selling their music as part of their story, not as discrete art works, says Tom Ewing

Tom Ewing

10, Feb, 2011 @10:30 PM

Tom Ewing | Give me pop music that leaves adolescence behind
Tom Ewing: Where is today's pop music for grownups who don't want to be teenagers any more? Abba's icily adult 1980s hits are a good start

Tom Ewing

05, Aug, 2010 @9:29 PM

Article image
Tom Ewing | Move over summer hits – the 'summer jam' is here
Tom Ewing: Summer hits were the Black Death of music – infections brought home by hapless travellers. But the summer jam is a different beast

Tom Ewing

24, Jun, 2010 @10:05 PM

Tom Ewing | The tricky art of titling songs
Dull titles can't hurt good music, but good ones enhance it – more so now that mood-setting sleeve art is routinely relegated to a tiny jpeg

Tom Ewing

16, Sep, 2010 @8:44 PM

Article image
Tom Ewing | Why it's the little moments we should be celebrating in pop
We organise our listening by tracks and albums, but it's the isolated moments that provide pop's most immediate and repeatable pleasures

Tom Ewing

09, Dec, 2010 @10:30 PM

Article image
Introspection – the musical theme of 2011
Tom Ewing: Drake might not have any obvious connection to Bon Iver and James Blake – but they all inhabit a private world to which you, the listener, are not invited

Tom Ewing

15, Dec, 2011 @9:10 PM

Article image
Why do X Factor winners make rotten albums?
Tom Ewing: There's nothing in the setup of modern pop that inherently means X-Factor winners end up with duds. It must be the show itself

Tom Ewing

17, Nov, 2011 @10:30 PM

Article image
CD: Keane: Perfect Symmetry

Top marks to Keane for changing their sound - but did they really mean to turn into a preachy band from the 1980s? By Alexis Petridis

Alexis Petridis

09, Oct, 2008 @11:01 PM