EU’s gender ruling on car insurance has made inequality worse

It said car insurance firms couldn’t discriminate between the sexes ... since then men have seen a four-fold rise in premiums

In December 2012 the EU introduced controversial new rules insisting that car insurance companies no longer discriminate on the basis of gender. Until then, men were being routinely charged more than women, but after the European Court of Justice ruled that different premiums for men and women purely on the grounds of sex “were incompatible with the principle of unisex pricing included in EU gender equality legislation”, they had to go – even if it meant women would have to pay more as the gap between the sexes closed.

But what has happened since the rules came into force? Instead of the gap between men’s and women’s premiums narrowing, as expected, it has actually widened. In 2012, men on average paid £27 more for a car insurance policy than a woman, but rather remarkably they now they pay £101 more – nearly a four-fold increase.

These figures are based on an analysis by, which collects 4m quotes every quarter from British drivers looking to arrange their insurance, so one assumes they must be right.

So is this a case of an EU ruling spectacularly backfiring? Of well-meaning but deluded gender warriors in Brussels interfering in places they shouldn’t – and then shooting themselves in the foot? “It’s just equality gone mad” was the sort of comment that greeted this ruling when it was introduced.

So what’s going on here? First, it’s doubtful that the insurance companies are simply ignoring the EU ruling and breaking the law. It’s pretty simple for people like me to test this, by changing my name from Patrick to Patricia on an internet quote engine and seeing if I get different results – and I don’t.

What appears to be at work is that car insurance companies set a price very much according to all the other data they can find on you – without actually asking your gender. So the quote you get back reflects the risks attached to your occupation, how much you drive, the sort of car you drive and whether you have made any modifications to the car.

I asked to explain the worsening premiums for men, despite gender equality. It said: “The continuing disparity between men and women could be linked to the fact that certain male-dominated occupations may have a poorer claims experience.

“Also, on average, men may tend to drive larger and more costly vehicles. The more expensive/high-spec the vehicle, the more likely it is that the cost of repairs will be higher, and therefore this is reflected in the premium charged.”

There was a separate report from earlier in the week which revealed the occupations with the worst rates of drink- and drug-driving. Eight out of 10 of the worst are in the building trade, with scaffolders the worst. On average they have to pay an extra £470 for car insurance following a conviction.

On the other side of the equation are midwives, an occupation the least likely to drink- or drug-drive. Now I don’t want to be accused of sexism, but most scaffolders are probably men, and most midwives, women.

Kevin Pratt of says: “Women tend to drive fewer miles, have fewer accidents, the accidents they do have are less serious, and they have fewer convictions for drink-driving.

“Insurers don’t look at gender, but they will look at all these characteristics very carefully.”

My conclusion is that the EU ruling has done women a favour. Before, insurers bluntly charged you a bit more if you were male, a bit less if you were female. Now they have to price it according to rather more concise data reflecting your individual driving behaviour.

My guess is that women were actually paying too much before the ruling and are now paying premiums that more accurately reflect their risk.

Car insurance may have become less equal. But it is more fair.


Patrick Collinson

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Whiplash: the myth that funds a £20bn gravy train
After an accident I stepped away uninjured but was pestered to claim. Now, a brave neurosurgeon speaks out

Patrick Collinson

29, Apr, 2017 @6:00 AM

Article image
Male pensioners to lose out if European court backs insurance gender equality

New rules could ban gender discrimination for pension annuities and car insurance premiums

Rupert Jones

27, Feb, 2011 @2:00 PM

Article image
Your car in the Covid lockdown: how to save on insurance and more
Some Britons are driving much less than before– here are ways to cut costs

Sue Hayward

06, Mar, 2021 @1:00 PM

Article image
Swiftcover won’t pay out what I’m due after a serious car accident
We claimed, but we can’t get the £1,000 or so the vehicle was worth

Miles Brignall

20, May, 2019 @6:00 AM

Article image
Women count cost of car insurance as EU gender rules come into force
New EU gender rules mean women could pay up to 40% more for car insurance – and men will lose out on annuities

Mark King

21, Dec, 2012 @9:36 AM

Article image
Motor insurers feel the pain of whiplash
No-win no-fee outfits are adding hugely to our motor insurance premiums, but the industry needs to get its own act together

Patrick Collinson

17, Feb, 2012 @10:58 PM

Article image
Avoid paying a premium for car insurance
Latest figures reveal the soaring costs of cover, with warnings of further rises to come. But here’s what you can do to get a better deal

Rupert Jones

24, Sep, 2016 @6:00 AM

Article image
Car insurance firms use loopholes to keep costs high for loyal customers
It is banned from charging more for renewals than new deals, but the industry still has some tricks up its sleeve

Anna Tims

28, May, 2022 @8:00 AM

Article image
‘My parked car was hit twice, but the insurers won’t pay’
Jacqueline Green’s vehicle is a write-off after two crashes that weren’t her fault. So why is she unable to claim?

Miles Brignall

26, Aug, 2017 @6:00 AM

Article image
Electric car insurance in UK ‘is £45 less than for petrol or diesel vehicle’ analysis shows electric car drivers were charged an average of £566

Hilary Osborne

08, May, 2021 @6:00 AM