Sky added £3,000 to pensioner’s bill but sent statements to late wife

Online bills can mean some vulnerable people have no way of tracking what they are spending

When Kate Harrison’s father was in hospital, she started going through his bills and bank statements to make sure all were in order. She was shocked to discover he had been paying Sky a massive £179 a month – a fifth of his pension income.

The huge bill was made up of £109 for his TV package and £70 for “CLI charges”, a levy she knew nothing about. And, after investigating, she found he had been paying that fee for four years – amounting to more than £3,000. It was an enormous sum for 81-year-old Mike, which contributed to him going into debt to his credit card company.

The charges began when Mike was a carer for his wife Barbara, who had dementia. Since she dealt with a lot of the household outgoings and received bills online, he had little knowledge of what he was expected to pay for services such as TV. Even after she died in 2018, the statements continued to go to her email address.

“He had no idea that £179 was outrageous, and thought that was just what you had to pay. He was not getting any kind of statement and he was not going to challenge it,” explains Kate.

She also says that her father was too preoccupied at the time, caring for his wife, to focus on bills.

When she challenged Sky initially, she says the call handler told her it would only refund £220, and suggested it was her responsibility to monitor her dad’s bills.

After she took to social media, Sky apologised and handed the money back. But the case illustrates the pitfalls of online billing, particularly where vulnerable customers are involved.

When Sky customers have a number of its boxes in their home, each one is separately subscribed to the customer’s full package, called Sky Multiscreen. But you don’t have to pay the full subscription for each box – a discount is applied.

However, to ensure each box is being used in the right location, Sky insists it is connected to the internet or a telephone line to monitor usage. If not, call line identification (CLI) charges apply. This is a way for the company to take back the discounts if it cannot see that all the boxes are being used by one household.

The measures are meant to stop people selling the additional box, using it in another location, or taking it to another property when they are away from home.

In this case, four years of charges were levied even though Mike’s two boxes remained in his house in Liverpool. The second box he had was disconnected at some point in 2017.

Notifications of the charges were sent in 2017 and 2018 to Barbara at a time when she was unable to deal with them. The charges continued unnoticed for four years, with the only detailed bills from Sky going to her inbox.

“Sky’s system should be telling it that a person has not responded, or even read, any emails for years, and a letter should be triggered to remind them why they’re being charged so much,” says Kate.

“My parents had been customers for 14 years with an out-of-date box that can’t even connect to wireless internet.”

She acknowledges that her father could have queried the bills, but he did not know what was an appropriate amount and, at the time the charges started, was looking after his dying wife.

The company has agreed to pay back £3,104.50 to cover them, but she feels some compensation should be paid for “neglectful communication”.

Sky subsequently agreed to reduce his monthly bills.

In a statement to the Observer, Sky said the CLI charges are “a legitimate security measure so we can check Sky boxes are being used in the correct home by the customers they’re meant for”.

It added: “These charges end when the box is connected to the internet or telephone line and the location is verified. When a box isn’t connected, customers are informed three times before the charges start, and we continue to regularly remind customers that the charges are being applied until the box is connected.

“Unfortunately, in this case, we were unable to verify the location of the box from 2017 onwards. Due to circumstances outside of the customer’s control, it was never reconnected. We have apologised, and refunded the charges in full.”

The company has also heavily discounted his TV package for 18 months, which now costs £4 a month, and it is sending paper bills.

Sky refuses to say how many customers get CLI charges, or how much it collects every year from them.

Ofcom, the communications regulator, says all providers must have policies in place to make sure vulnerable customers are treated fairly.

“People’s circumstances can change at any point, and we expect providers to understand and identify the characteristics and needs of vulnerable customers, and make sure they get the support,” it adds. “Any customer who doesn’t think they’ve been treated fairly should complain to their provider in the first instance. If you’re unhappy with the outcome, you can take the complaint to an independent ombudsman who will look at the case and make a judgment on it.”

In the case of Sky, the independent ombudsman is the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution (Cisas), which has not responded to a request for comment.

For Kate, the importance of discussing finances with older family members, especially after bereavement, has been highlighted. “Money’s a delicate subject, but I wish we’d talked about it sooner,” she says. “Older, or vulnerable, people aren’t always aware of what charges are fair. Often they are worse off for not being online, or trying to negotiate better deals, as younger customers routinely do.”

Contributor

Shane Hickey

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
£3,000 bill from British Gas …and I’m not even a customer
I’ve been harassed over six years and threatened by debt collectors

Anna Tims

28, Apr, 2016 @6:00 AM

Article image
Installation of smart meter leaves elderly woman facing £4,000 bill
Vulnerable 94-year-old’s boiler had to be scrapped following work by SSE

Miles Brignall

27, Sep, 2020 @8:00 AM

Article image
Outrageous £206,000 water bill blunder took 10 days to sort
Thames Water said it would ‘look into it’ … and I only knew about it because my bank alerted me

Anna Tims

28, Mar, 2018 @6:33 AM

Article image
Why did Npower bill me £2,800 a year after I moved out?
The energy company adjusted its meter readings and seems to have lost control of its billing

Anna Tims

05, Jul, 2018 @6:00 AM

Article image
Co-op says it has ‘a heart’. So why send a £12,600 backbill?
One family plans to sell their home to pay, and others are fighting off debt collectors in the wake of a corporate IT failure

Anna Tims

15, Sep, 2019 @6:00 AM

Article image
BT left me without a phone for four weeks and blamed Sky
Consumer advice: As a disabled, terminal cancer patient it’s vital that I can communicate with the hospital and the GP’s surgery; BT have offered a paltry £200 in compensation

Anna Tims

05, Dec, 2014 @7:01 AM

Article image
How can Vodafone charge me £1.50 a minute for an EU call?
I’ve been phoning my partner in Greece from the UK at an eye-watering rate despite changes to roaming rules

Anna Tims

05, Oct, 2017 @6:00 AM

Article image
Npower does not have the energy to sort my partner’s billing issue
He has been sent numerous demands for payment, ranging from £450 to more than £2,000, and many figures in between

Anna Tims

19, Aug, 2016 @6:00 AM

Article image
It took all my energy to get EDF to install a meter for my flat
There was only one supplying two flats and I needed my own

Anna Tims

02, Mar, 2018 @7:00 AM

Article image
Scottish Power accused of ‘cruel’ harassment of householders over debts they don’t owe
Its ‘chaotic’ accounting system is sending out bills and bailiff threats to non-customers

Anna Tims

01, Mar, 2020 @7:00 AM