How women can invest more ethically | Letters

We need to think hard about the kind of future our money is going to support through our investments, writes Mary Stevens of Friends of the Earth. Plus a letter from Margaret Squires

Your article on why women need to start investing to exercise more control over their futures (Why finance is a feminist issue, G2, 9 April) contains much sound advice. However, it neglects an important consideration. If, as Emilie Bellet explains, women are “looking more at where we want to be in 10, 20 or 30 years’ time”, then we also need to think hard about the kind of future our money is going to support. Many women – and men – would be horrified to think that the price for their own security is increased uncertainty and instability across the world, as many funds continue to rely heavily on the fossil fuel and extractive industries. Even so-called ethical funds are often only undertaking basic negative screening, for example ruling out pornography, weapons, tobacco and gambling, but with very little to say on climate risk. The real bottom line is that there is no money to be made on a dead planet.

Happily, this can be a win-win situation. Increasingly, fund managers are recognising the risk of the “carbon bubble” and are starting to shift their own funds. And evidence is growing that over the long term, sustainable investments can outperform the broken business-as-usual market. But this shift won’t happen without ongoing consumer pressure on the financial sector. An influx of motivated women into this space presents an excellent opportunity.

At Friends of the Earth we have been campaigning for fossil fuel divestment and corporate accountability for many years. Through our innovation work we are currently piloting a new peer-led programme for women who want to take control of their finances, but in a way that supports their vision for a safe and liveable planet. Your readers may find the recently published Good Guide to Impact Investing a good place to start.
Mary Stevens
Experiments programme manager, Friends of the Earth

• Your article says “if you had invested £1 in the FTSE 250 10 years ago, it would now have grown to £2.53, once inflation is taken into account”. However, if you had invested it in 2007 rather than 2009 it would only just have recovered its value. Admittedly, you would have received dividends, but these were not guaranteed to do better than if you had put the money in Ernie.
Margaret Squires
St Andrews, Fife

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
World's biggest fund manager vows to divest from thermal coal
BlackRock CEO says climate crisis will now dictate investments but environmentalists remain wary

Joanna Partridge

14, Jan, 2020 @4:27 PM

Article image
UK's biggest pension fund begins fossil fuels divestment
National Employment Savings Trust to shun firms involved in coal, tar sands or arctic drilling

Patrick Collinson and Jillian Ambrose

29, Jul, 2020 @5:01 AM

Article image
World Bank and IMF must spearhead a green and inclusive recovery | Letter
Letter: A group of European ministers and the EC’s commissioner for international partnerships call for measures to foster long-term resilience in the global economy and environment

Letters

14, Oct, 2020 @4:42 PM

Article image
Storms, cyclones and floods will only worsen as the planet warms | Letters
Letters: Craig Bennett, CEO of Friends of the Earth, says rich countries must act to make disasters such as the cyclone that hit Mozambique less likely. Meteorologist Bernadette Woods Placky describes how Climate Matters is helping to end the ‘TV news desert’ around global warming. Plus letters from Caroline Evans and Daniel Scharf

Letters

20, Mar, 2019 @6:17 PM

Article image
Fossil fuel-free funds outperformed conventional ones, analysis shows
Investors who dumped holdings in coal, oil and gas earned an average return of 1.2% more a year over last five years, data from the world’s leading stock market index reveals

Patrick Collinson

10, Apr, 2015 @3:21 PM

Article image
BlackRock holds $85bn in coal despite pledge to sell fossil fuel shares
Loophole means asset manager can hold shares in firms earning less than a quarter of revenues from coal

Jasper Jolly

13, Jan, 2021 @5:00 AM

Article image
Those who caused the financial crisis still haven’t been held to account | Letter
Letter: Susan Hawley of Corruption Watch and Rachel Teka Davies of Transparency International UK say banks will act with impunity until our arcane liability laws are changed

Letters

20, Sep, 2018 @4:58 PM

Article image
Ignoring the lessons of the financial crash | Letters
Letters: Mistakes that led to the 2008 financial crisis are about to be repeated, fears Milan Bollecker, while David Reed is worried by the economic impact of soaring property prices

Letters

23, Oct, 2019 @5:28 PM

Article image
Can we humans save ourselves from self-destruction? | Letters
Letters: Richard Middleton, Robin Russell-Jones, Judith Wright, Tom Fyans, Richard Aldwinckle, John Nissen, and Mayer Hillman respond to the latest dire warnings from scientists and policymakers on biodiversity and climate change

Letters

07, May, 2019 @4:59 PM

Article image
Top UK fund manager divests from fossil fuels
Archbishop of Canterbury plays crucial role in BMO Global Asset Management’s decision to dump £20m of shares in firms such as BHP Billiton

Patrick Collinson

15, May, 2017 @5:01 AM