Lachlan Murdoch alleges Crikey hired marketing firm to turn legal threat into subscription drive

News Corp co-chair’s lawyer tells federal court she intends to show Crikey did not republish article for public interest reasons

Crikey hired a marketing company to capitalise on a legal threat from Lachlan Murdoch in order to drive subscriptions, the co-chair of News Corporation has alleged in the federal court.

Murdoch launched defamation proceedings in August against the independent news site over an article published in June that named the Murdoch family as an “unindicted co-conspirator” in the US Capitol attack. The trial has been set down for March 2023 but the parties are in dispute over pretrial matters.

One of the matters heard by justice Michael Wigney in a brief hearing was an allegation by the Murdoch team that a marketing campaign, run by brand strategists Populares, undermines the public interest defence on which Crikey publisher Private Media was relying.

In response to a concerns letter from Murdoch in June, Crikey initially agreed to take down the article but after failing to reach agreement it was reinstated on 15 August.

Sue Chrysanthou SC, for Murdoch, said she intends to show that republication of the article was not for public interest reasons but for a marketing campaign.

She said Populares produced a “significant report” titled “Lachlan Murdoch Campaign” about how “a dispute with my client could be marketed for the purposes of attracting new readers and gaining subscriptions”.

“The purpose of the re-posting was not for the public interest, it was for the media campaign,” she said.

In his statement of claim in August Murdoch alleged that the placement of a New York Times advertisement inviting him to sue Crikey over the alleged defamation was “seeking to humiliate” the executive chair and chief executive of Fox Corporation.

Chrysanthou said social media was “the modern-day grapevine” and alleged Crikey had paid for some posts about her client “to be promoted and advertised”.

She sought orders for Crikey to provide further information in response to questions because the submitted outlines of information did not address anything after the 29 June publication of the article by Crikey’s politics editor, Bernard Keane.

Wigney said the request for written answers to about 180 questions, including sub-questions, could delay proceedings and he repeatedly asked Chrysanthou: “Do you want this to go to trial in March?”

“I would withdraw those interrogatories you can cross-examine them,” he said.

Private Media’s lawyer, Clarissa Amato, said Chrysanthou’s request would result in a “a catastrophic waste of time and money”.

“Some of those may be things simply left out of the discovery list by accident … there are other requests that are effectively new categories of documents,” Amato said.

Chrysanthou said the social media posts about her client had spread “like a virus”, and she would call a social media expert to give evidence explaining the reach.

“We want the expert to address that issue, and the effect of promoting particular posts and how that then causes those posts to appear in different people’s feeds,” Chrysanthou said.

She said the expert would be asked to explain a few essential posts, relevant to claims of serious harm from the publication.

Murdoch is seeking damages because through the publication and republication of the article he alleges he “has been gravely injured in his character, his personal reputation and his professional reputation as a business person and company director, and has suffered and will continue to suffer substantial hurt, distress and embarrassment”.

The parties will return to court on Thursday.

Contributor

Amanda Meade

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Crikey: small independent news website challenges Lachlan Murdoch to sue it for defamation
Crikey.com.au issues challenge in newspaper ads, including in the New York Times, after Murdoch issues legal threat over article

Ben Doherty

22, Aug, 2022 @10:32 AM

Article image
Lachlan Murdoch accuses Australian news site Crikey of using legal threat to attract subscriptions
Lawyers for Murdoch say an ad in the New York Times sought to ‘humiliate’ the Fox Corporation chief executive

Amanda Meade

24, Aug, 2022 @3:26 AM

Article image
Lachlan Murdoch files defamation action against Australian independent news outlet Crikey
Claim lodged by co-chairman of News Corp names news website, politics editor Bernard Keane and editor-in-chief Peter Fray as respondents

Amanda Meade

23, Aug, 2022 @10:41 AM

Article image
Lachlan Murdoch adds Private Media chairman and CEO to Crikey lawsuit
Federal court ruling expanding defamation case to include Eric Beecher and Will Hayward set to significantly delay trial

Amanda Meade

30, Jan, 2023 @7:54 AM

Article image
What’s in the public interest? Murdoch v Crikey trial could test new defamation defence
Lachlan Murdoch says independent Australian publisher can’t rely on defence after it connected media baron to evidence at hearing into January 6 riots

Amanda Meade

10, Oct, 2022 @8:03 AM

Article image
Lachlan Murdoch defamation case: Crikey article was ‘self-evidently hyperbolic’, publisher argues
Private Media says in court documents that ‘no one’ would read the words of the Crikey article literally

Amanda Meade

22, Sep, 2022 @2:46 AM

Article image
What sort of country are we? That’s the question implicit in Lachlan Murdoch v Crikey | Richard Ackland
For Australian media, this case is important – it asks whether anyone is free to publish in the public interest a hyperbolic remark about a wealthy media baron

Richard Ackland

09, Dec, 2022 @2:00 PM

Article image
Crikey kicks off fortnight of apologising to Lachlan Murdoch and Christine Holgate | The Weekly Beast
Online publisher launches two front-page apologies for serious mistake in Stephen Mayne column. Plus: News Corp top brass at SMH birthday bash

Amanda Meade

23, Apr, 2021 @2:31 AM

Article image
Lachlan Murdoch asked to appear at parliamentary inquiry into YouTube’s suspension of Sky News Australia
Hearing to examine temporary ban for breaching Covid misinformation policies with chair hoping to grill Murdoch on ‘standards of journalism and accurate reporting’

Amanda Meade

01, Sep, 2021 @5:30 PM

Article image
Chris Dore’s exit from News Corp lifts lid on behaviour at governor general’s residence | Weekly Beast
Dore was promoted to editor-in-chief of the Australian despite alleged behaviour and remained in post until WSJ event. Plus: Friendlyjordies’ fire scare

Amanda Meade

25, Nov, 2022 @3:15 AM