EU cites ‘anti-vaccine campaign’ as reason to toughen social media code

European Commission proposes more factchecking and algorithm changes to tackle disinformation

A “massive anti-vaccination campaign” has been cited by the European Commission as a reason for social media platforms to intensify their factchecking and revise the internal algorithms that can amplify disinformation.

Under a revised code of practice proposed by Brussels, companies such as Facebook, Google and Twitter would need to show why particular material is disseminated and prove that false information is being blocked.

The code would be voluntary but will work alongside an upcoming digital services act, under which companies could be fined up to 6% of their annual revenue for failing to remove illegal content where harm can be proven. Messaging services such as WhatsApp could also be covered by the code.

Social media companies that sign up will be better able to show they are dealing with online falsehoods and avoid financial penalties.

Věra Jourová, a European Commission vice-president, said the details of how the code will work would be discussed with the signatories, with the intention that it will come into force in 2022.

She said: “We see a very massive anti-vaccination campaign, which can really hinder our efforts to get people vaccinated and to get rid of Covid.

“Also we see the impact not only on individuals but also on our democratic systems on our elections, because the combination of micro-targeting technique and well-tailored is something which can be winning the elections and this is what we do not want to see in Europe.”

Jourová, a former minister in the Czech Republic, said the commission did not want to hinder freedom of speech but the platforms needed to be more effective in factchecking through independent operators.

In light of Twitter’s decision in January to block Donald Trump from using its platform, Jourová said the commission was seeking to distinguish between fact and opinion, the latter of which it was not the job of the commission to police.

“We would like them to embed the factchecking into the system so that it is systemic action, that the factchecking is more intense and so it also guarantees that the platforms themselves will not be those to decide,” she said. “We have had many discussions in light of what we saw in the United States where the platforms already reacted, for instance on President Trump’s tweets and so on.

“I lived in a communist Czechoslovakia and I remember well the functioning and very bad impact on them, on the society, of the Soviet ministry of information. This is not what we want to introduce in Europe.”

Google, Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft and TikTok signed up to the previous code of conduct established in 2018 but this was widely seen to have failed in its objective to demonetise disinformation.

“A new stronger code is necessary as we need online platforms and other players to address the systemic risks of their services and algorithmic amplification, stop policing themselves alone and stop allowing to make money on disinformation, while fully preserving the freedom of speech,” Jourová said.

Contributor

Daniel Boffey in Brussels

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Tech firms could face new EU regulations over fake news
EU security commissioner says new regulations may have to be brought in if tech firms fail to tackle issues voluntarily

Jennifer Rankin in Brussels

24, Apr, 2018 @8:45 AM

Article image
Opinion divided over Trump's ban from social media
Actions spark debate on free speech and whether chief executives of tech firms are fit to act as judge and jury

Alex Hern

11, Jan, 2021 @6:17 PM

Article image
EU gives Facebook and Google three months to tackle extremist content
Commission says internet companies also including YouTube and Twitter need to show progress on issue or face legislation

Samuel Gibbs

01, Mar, 2018 @2:42 PM

Article image
In the new robopolitics, social media has left newspapers for dead | Damian Tambini
Much of the success of the Brexit and Trump campaigns was due to Twitter, Facebook and co. Who needs mainstream media when you’ve got algorithms?

Damian Tambini

18, Nov, 2016 @9:17 AM

Article image
Social media firms must face heavy fines over extremist content – MPs
An inquiry by the Commons home affairs committee condemns technology companies for failing to tackle hate speech

Owen Bowcott Legal affairs correspondent

01, May, 2017 @5:01 AM

Article image
Facebook and Twitter told us they would tackle ‘fake news’. They failed | Julian King and Mariya Gabriel
Tech giants signed up to our EU code to counter disinformation – but with key elections looming, they are falling short, write Julian King and Mariya Gabriel

Julian King and Mariya Gabriel

28, Feb, 2019 @1:57 PM

Article image
Israel and Hamas clash on social media
As in the field, Israel deploys superior strength and resources as both sides attack each other on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube

Harriet Sherwood

16, Jul, 2014 @5:18 PM

Article image
Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Microsoft sign EU hate speech code
To tackle racism and xenophobia, big internet companies say they will try to review most notifications within 24 hours

Alex Hern

31, May, 2016 @12:16 PM

Article image
Trump's vote fraud claims go viral on social media despite curbs
President’s posts are top on Facebook as efforts to stop misinformation about election prove ineffective

Alex Hern Technology editor

10, Nov, 2020 @6:43 PM

Article image
Australia passes social media law penalising platforms for violent content
Labor supports legislation in response to Christchurch shooting that threatens jail for executives, despite media companies’ concerns

Paul Karp

04, Apr, 2019 @2:09 AM