FT reporter accused of listening to Zoom calls of rival outlet resigns

Independent complained Mark Di Stefano had eavesdropped on sensitive meetings

A Financial Times reporter accused by the Independent of listening in on sensitive Zoom meetings held by senior managers telling staff about salary cuts and furloughs has resigned.

Mark Di Stefano, who joined the FT from Buzzfeed in January, tweeted on Friday that he had resigned and was “going to take some time away and log off”.

Di Stefano had been accused of listening to the audio feed of video conference calls held by the Independent and its sister title the Evening Standard about responding to the financial impact of coronavirus.

The FT suspended Di Stefano, who broke the news of the meetings on Twitter at the same time as staff were being informed, after the Independent discovered the eavesdropping from an analysis of Zoom log files and alerted the newspaper’s managers.

Hi, letting everyone know today was my last day at the FT. This afternoon I offered my resignation. Thank you everyone who has given support. I’m now going to take some time away and log off x

— Mark Di Stefano (@MarkDiStef) May 1, 2020

“Last week, the FT received a complaint from the Independent that a reporter had joined a staff conference call without authorisation,” an FT spokeswoman said. “Access details had been shared with him. The journalist in question has now resigned from the company.

“The FT wishes to apologise to the Independent and the Evening Standard, which subsequently informed the FT that the same reporter had accessed a meeting it had held.”

Di Stefano’s actions raised questions about whether or not he had broken the law, given the meetings were not password protected.

Christopher Hutchings, a lawyer at Hamlins who has dealt with a number of phone hacking cases, says “Zoombombing” could be in breach of the Computer Misuse Act and data protection and privacy laws.

Di Stefano’s actions were in breach of the FT’s code of conduct, which states: “The press must not seek to obtain or publish material acquired by … intercepting private or mobile telephone calls, messages or emails. Engaging in misrepresentation or subterfuge … can generally be justified only in the public interest and then only when the material cannot be obtained by other means.”

Hutchings said there was no a public interest defence to invoke in the case. “I would be extremely doubtful that the journalist’s conduct and actions would enable him to rely on this argument,” he said.


Mark Sweney

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
FT suspends journalist accused of listening to rival outlets' Zoom calls
Mark Di Stefano allegedly accessed sensitive Independent and Evening Standard meetings

Mark Sweney

27, Apr, 2020 @6:03 PM

Article image
Which parties are the UK press backing in the general election?
National newspapers and magazines make their endorsements clear, with a focus on Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn

Ruth McKee

03, Jun, 2017 @1:36 PM

Article image
Can Apple, Amazon and Google's new mini-tablets revive the news industry?
Charles Arthur: Apps on cheaper, portable computers could prove a boost for national newspapers

Charles Arthur

03, Sep, 2012 @5:42 PM

Article image
FT journalists end strike prospect with vote to accept new pension offer
NUJ members also criticise decision to shut Independent and Independent on Sunday print editions without consulting staff

Mark Sweney

15, Feb, 2016 @7:44 PM

Article image
Evgeny Lebedev: Press Complaints Commission is not fit for purpose

Publisher critical of watchdog's handling of phone-hacking affair and says newspapers should work together to uphold standards

Dan Sabbagh

04, Jul, 2011 @7:15 PM

Article image
Alexander Lebedev sounding out buyers for Independent titles
Any deal would exclude London Evening Standard, while separate sale of profitable i thought to be open to discussion

Mark Sweney

16, Jan, 2014 @8:27 PM

Article image
Press regulation battles fought without much public, or journalistic, interest
As Impress stands on the verge of official royal charter recognition, editors who support Ipso lay claim to official recognition for their code

Roy Greenslade

23, Aug, 2016 @8:43 AM

Article image
Press freedom danger if MPs vote in section 40 by the back door
Warnings about the royal charter underpinning of press regulation come to pass with the Lords amendment to the investigatory powers bill

Roy Greenslade

27, Oct, 2016 @2:48 PM

Article image
Former civil servant appointed to review independence of Ipso
Sir Joseph Pilling will also consider the regulator’s effectiveness and its funding

Roy Greenslade

24, Feb, 2016 @12:01 AM

Press regulator Impress ready to reveal its first 'clients'
Body independent of the industry soon to announce publishers’ identities

Roy Greenslade

15, Jan, 2016 @3:52 PM