Free speech groups call for public interest defence for whistleblowers

English Pen, Index on Censorship and Reporters Without Borders condemn proposal for a more punitive Espionage Act

A public interest defence should be created to protect journalists and whistleblowers who disclose secret information that reveals serious criminal activity or widespread breaches of human rights, an alliance of free speech organisations has said.

English Pen, Index on Censorship and Reporters Without Borders have condemned a proposal by the Law Commission for a more punitive Espionage Act with longer maximum penalty for leaking official data.

The Law Commission has recommended there is no need for a public interest defence because “guidelines promulgated by the director of public prosecutions are designed to ensure that a journalist is only prosecuted when this is clearly in the public interest”.

In a combined submission to the commission’s consultation, which closed this week, the three organisations argue that a public interest defence could be inserted into the existing Official Secrets Act.

They say such a defence would protect disclosure of information “which demonstrated, for instance, criminal activity of a level of seriousness which attracts punishment above a particular threshold, or breach of human rights which applied to a large number of people.”

A public interest defence “would neither give rise to unworkable uncertainty nor provide cover for partisan political activities”, their submission asserts. A similar whistleblowing provision already exists within the 1996 Employment Rights Act, they point out; Canada’s Security of information Act also provides a public interest defence.

Relying on reporting concerns to the newly appointed investigatory powers commissioner, Lord Justice Fulford, as the Law Commission report proposes, would be impractical and overburden him as he pursues his broader responsibilities, the organisations say.

“The commissioner’s existing oversight and statutory duties may allow the post-holder little time to devote to the receipt of, investigation of, and reporting on, matters disclosed to him.”

Journalists and whistleblowers do not currently have sufficient protection, the three anti-censorship organisations say. “For instance, in 2013 the Guardian newspaper was threatened with prosecution under section 5 of the Official Secrets Act 1989 unless it physically destroyed hard drives and memory chips containing the secret files provided to it and others by Edward Snowden. The Guardian destroyed the files notwithstanding that their contents had in some cases already been published and that the files were still held by other media organisations.”

Jo Glanville, the director of English Pen, said: “This [proposal by the Law Commission] seems to be rolling the back the tide in a most pointless manner.”


Owen Bowcott Legal affairs correspondent

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Government advisers accused of 'full-frontal attack' on whistleblowers
Outcry follows plans to radically increase prison terms for revealing state secrets and to prosecute journalists

Rob Evans, Ian Cobain and Nicola Slawson

12, Feb, 2017 @7:52 PM

Article image
Free speech in parliament is precious, says lord chief justice

Lord chief justice declares principle is 'fundamental' and warns fellow judges on 'super-injuctions'

Alan Travis

20, Oct, 2009 @8:56 PM

An inquiry into press practice will be good for free speech | John Kampfner
John Kampfner: Though the timing may be opportunistic, Ed Miliband is right. Libel reform, privacy and media standards need looking at

John Kampfner

20, Apr, 2011 @8:00 PM

Article image
Nick Clegg slams politicians who proclaim free speech yet seek to constrain it
Deputy prime minister stands up for journalists in under-reported speech - to journalists

Roy Greenslade

16, Jan, 2015 @11:29 AM

Article image
No 10 denies plans would curb freedom of journalists and whistleblowers
Theresa May’s spokesman defends Law Commission proposals to radically increase prison terms for revealing and handling state secrets

Rowena Mason Deputy political editor

13, Feb, 2017 @12:54 PM

Article image
Super-injunctions do limit freedom of speech, Speaker's lawyers advise

Guidance contradicts justice minister's claim that injunctions do not affect reporting rights under 1688 bill

Caroline Davies

06, Dec, 2009 @9:50 PM

Article image
Whistleblowers endangered in digital age, says lawyers' report
Study backed by Guardian says new laws and interception of communications make it harder for journalists to protect sources

Owen Bowcott Legal affairs correspondent

22, Feb, 2017 @7:04 PM

Article image
Whistleblower protection and the public interest | Letters
Letters: In the Law Commission’s report, a beguiling premise that the interests of state, government and citizens are always synonymous is followed by an absurd but dangerous conclusion


13, Feb, 2017 @7:33 PM

Guardian claims right to free speech
The attorney general is taking the Guardian to court today to try to stop the newspaper's challenge to a 155-year-old law which still makes it a criminal offence to advocate abolition of the monarchy in print. By Clare Dyer.

Clare Dyer, legal correspondent

21, May, 2003 @6:55 AM

Article image
Keir Starmer to call for journalists to have a public interest defence
Former director of public prosecutions who pursued cases against reporters for paying public officials now wants them to have legal protection

Roy Greenslade

13, Jul, 2015 @9:31 AM