Guardian gagged from reporting parliament

Guardian prevented from reporting parliamentary proceedings on legal grounds which appear to call into question privileges guaranteeing free speech established under the 1688 Bill of Rights

The Guardian has been prevented from reporting parliamentary proceedings on legal grounds which appear to call into question privileges guaranteeing free speech established under the 1688 Bill of Rights.

Today's published Commons order papers contain a question to be answered by a minister later this week. The Guardian is prevented from identifying the MP who has asked the question, what the question is, which minister might answer it, or where the question is to be found.

The Guardian is also forbidden from telling its readers why the paper is prevented – for the first time in memory – from reporting parliament. Legal obstacles, which cannot be identified, involve proceedings, which cannot be mentioned, on behalf of a client who must remain secret.

The only fact the Guardian can report is that the case involves the London solicitors Carter-Ruck, who specialise in suing the media for clients, who include individuals or global corporations.

The Guardian has vowed urgently to go to court to overturn the gag on its reporting. The editor, Alan Rusbridger, said: "The media laws in this country increasingly place newspapers in a Kafkaesque world in which we cannot tell the public anything about information which is being suppressed, nor the proceedings which suppress it. It is doubly menacing when those restraints include the reporting of parliament itself."

The media lawyer Geoffrey Robertson QC said Lord Denning ruled in the 1970s that "whatever comments are made in parliament" can be reported in newspapers without fear of contempt.

He said: "Four rebel MPs asked questions giving the identity of 'Colonel B', granted anonymity by a judge on grounds of 'national security'. The DPP threatened the press might be prosecuted for contempt, but most published."

The right to report parliament was the subject of many struggles in the 18th century, with the MP and journalist John Wilkes fighting every authority – up to the king – over the right to keep the public informed. After Wilkes's battle, wrote the historian Robert Hargreaves, "it gradually became accepted that the public had a constitutional right to know what their elected representatives were up to".


David Leigh

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Guardian seeks urgent court hearing over parliament reporting gag

Editor Alan Rusbridger seeks court appearance over ban as Liberal Democrats table urgent question in Westminster

David Leigh

13, Oct, 2009 @11:25 AM

Article image
Carter-Ruck in new move to stop debate in parliament
Law firm claims controversial injunction obtained on behalf of oil traders Trafigura is 'sub judice'

David Leigh

15, Oct, 2009 @9:20 PM

Article image
How the Guardian was gagged from revealing Barclays tax secrets
An attempt by Barclays to suppress details of its allegedly massive tax avoidance schemes two years ago ended in farce

Rob Evans

18, Feb, 2011 @8:06 PM

Gag on Guardian reporting MP's Trafigura question lifted

The question from Paul Farrelly MP which was subject to a gagging order related to the Trafigura toxic waste scandal. By David Leigh

David Leigh

13, Oct, 2009 @12:08 PM

Article image
Free speech in parliament is precious, says lord chief justice

Lord chief justice declares principle is 'fundamental' and warns fellow judges on 'super-injuctions'

Alan Travis

20, Oct, 2009 @8:56 PM

Our weakened parliament | Denis MacShane

Denis MacShane: As the gagging of the Guardian shows, the transfer of power away from MPs is damaging our democracy

Denis MacShane

13, Oct, 2009 @3:00 PM

Parliament and free speech: The right to know

Editorial: It is rather shameful that British judges should have spared Trafigura's blushes by handing down secret injunctions. But at least the principle for which John Wilkes fought and was imprisoned in the 1770s – the right to report parliament – has not been clouded


13, Oct, 2009 @11:05 PM

MPs debate effect of libel law on reporting of parliament

Following last week's row about a 'super-injunction' preventing the Guardian reporting a question in the Commons about the oil trading firm Trafigura, MPs today debate the effects of libel law on the reporting of parliamentary proceedings

Andrew Sparrow

21, Oct, 2009 @11:43 AM

How super-injunctions are used to gag investigative reporting
The Guardian has been served with at least 12 notices of injunctions that could not be reported so far this year

James Robinson

13, Oct, 2009 @9:18 PM

Article image
The House of Commons discusses the Guardian's gagging order

Paul Farrelly raises the Guardian's gagging order in the House of Commons

13, Oct, 2009 @4:07 PM