John Roberts’ year-end report calls for judicial security but avoids abortion debate

Threats against federal judges surged as the conservative supreme court has been accused of ignoring public opinion

The supreme court chief justice, John Roberts, has focused a year-end judiciary report on the need for stepped up security for federal judges, amid a surge in threats and as the United States is embroiled in a bitter debate over abortion.

But Roberts chose to skirt around all the controversy engulfing the court in 2022, especially the chapter as its conservative super-majority struck down federal abortion rights afforded by the court’s landmark 1973 decision in Roe v Wade, in a decision that was scandalously leaked in the spring and then confirmed in June.

Instead he leaned into programs to protect judges against threats, which have escalated against supreme court justices in particular.

“The law requires every judge to swear an oath to perform his or her work without fear or favor, but we must support judges by ensuring their safety,” Roberts wrote, adding, “A judicial system cannot and should not live in fear.”

According to the US Marshals Service, judges were subject to 4,511 threats and inappropriate communications in 2021, up from 926 in 2015. Threats targeting members of Congress have also significantly surged in recent years.

An armed California man was charged last June with attempted murder after being arrested near the home of Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

The man told authorities he was upset about a leaked draft opinion to strike down Roe that was the key element in the Dobbs vs Jackson Women’s Health Organization case that emerged from Mississippi.

Justice Samuel Alito, who wrote the majority opinion in the Dobbs case, later said the leak made conservative justices “targets for assassination”.

Liberals have criticized the high court’s six-three conservative majority as being out of step with public sentiment on abortion and other cases touching on social issues.

With several more high-profile cases pending, the supreme court potentially could end affirmative action policies used to increase racial diversity on college campuses and make it easier for businesses to refuse services to LGBTQ+ people based on free-speech rights.

Roberts, writing in an annual year-end report about the federal judiciary, did not specifically mention the abortion decision, but the case and the reaction to it seemed clearly on his mind.

“Judicial opinions speak for themselves, and there is no obligation in our free country to agree with them. Indeed, we judges frequently dissent – sometimes strongly – from our colleagues’ opinions, and we explain why in public writings about the cases before us,” he wrote.

Polls following the abortion decision show public trust in the court is at historic lows. And two of Roberts’ liberal colleagues who dissented in the abortion case, Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, have said the court needs to be concerned about overturning precedent and appearing political.

After the leak and threat to Kavanaugh, lawmakers passed legislation increasing security protection for the justices and their families. Separately, in December, lawmakers passed legislation protecting the personal information of federal judges including their addresses.

Guardian staff and agencies

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Mike Pence calls supreme court justice John Roberts a ‘disappointment'
Vice-president, who is fervently anti-abortion, criticizes Roberts who sided with his four liberal colleagues on several decisions

Joan E Greve in Washington and agencies

06, Aug, 2020 @7:50 PM

Article image
Will 2020 be the year abortion is banned in the US?
A conservative supreme court will take up its first abortion case as activists brace for a fight that could change everything

Jessica Glenza in New York

21, Jan, 2020 @7:00 AM

Article image
Abortion forum: 2020 Democrats to take part in first US debate on reproductive rights
Nearly all of the Democratic candidates will participate in a first-of-its-kind forum, amid a climate that’s increasingly hostile to women’s health

Lauren Gambino in Washington

21, Jun, 2019 @1:45 PM

Article image
John Roberts is no longer the leader of his own court. Who, then, controls it?
Chief justice no longer sits in supreme court’s ideological center and has lost the power to cast the deciding vote in any ruling

Stephanie Kirchgaessner in Washington

11, Oct, 2021 @9:00 AM

Article image
Gillibrand calls abortion rights ‘fight of generation’ after ‘bone-chilling’ court draft opinion
New York Democrat urges her party to stand up to concerted efforts from Republicans seeking to abolish constitutional right

Maya Yang

08, May, 2022 @7:01 PM

Article image
Cecile Richards marks a year since RBG death with abortion rights battle cry
Former Planned Parenthood president cites Texas law and says Republicans are on brink of ending right to abortion

Martin Pengelly and agencies

18, Sep, 2021 @10:02 PM

Article image
Texas abortion providers ask supreme court to halt unprecedented abortion law
Center for Reproductive Rights and Planned Parenthood turn to justices in final bid to block near-total ban

Mary Tuma

30, Aug, 2021 @8:05 PM

Article image
The ‘rogue’ Trump-appointed judge with abortion pill’s future in his hands
Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk has amassed a litany of contentious rulings in less than four years

Ed Pilkington

10, Feb, 2023 @7:00 AM

Article image
Joe Biden scraps plan to nominate anti-abortion lawyer to Kentucky judgeship
Senator Rand Paul announced Friday he would not consent to Chad Meredith’s nomination, vetoing the president’s effort

Lauren Aratani

16, Jul, 2022 @6:56 PM

Article image
How Republicans pass abortion bans most Americans don’t want
Legalized abortion in some form is widely supported, but gerrymandered districts allow politicians to push extreme measures through

Sam Levine in New York

08, Jun, 2022 @6:00 AM