Retailers’ extended warranties give no more cover than existing consumer rights, Choice says

Consumer group found 91% of stores it investigated tried to sell extended warranties and claims 71% provided misleading information

Australian consumers are being sold extended warranties that provide no more cover than standard legal rights, the consumer group Choice has claimed.

Choice bought products from 80 stores in the Harvey Norman, JB Hi-Fi and The Good Guys chains.

It found 91% of the stores tried to sell extended warranties, and claimed 71% provided misleading information on a consumer’s rights if their product broke beyond the warranty period.

They often suggested that consumers had to pay for repairs themselves after the warranty period, and used those discussions to suggest consumers buy an extended warranty, the investigation found.

But consumers are entitled under the law to a repair, refund or replacement for a major fault within a reasonable amount of time of buying a product.

Marg Rafferty, the editorial director of Choice, said the law provided for full reimbursement if a product was faulty.

“Existing consumer rights provide all the protection you need against faulty products, so it’s incredibly disappointing to see these big retailers pushing these poor value extended warranties onto consumers during a cost of living crisis,” Rafferty said.

In some cases an extended warranty might offer a voucher to reimburse a consumer if a product failed, she said.

“But actually, under the consumer law, you’re entitled to ask for reimbursement for losses that happen as a result of a faulty product and there’s no dollar limit on it. Whereas the the extended warranty will say you can request $100, but that’s actually selling short what you’re already entitled to,” she said.

Manufacturers’ warranties typically last for one year, but a $2,000 television, for example, would be expected to last more than two years, Rafferty said.

If a product fails under those circumstances the retailer is obliged to help the consumer get in contact with the manufacturer.

“People need to go back to the place where they bought the product, and explain what’s gone wrong,” Rafferty said.

“Let that store know that you know you have rights under the consumer law and ask them to provide a remedy that is suitable.”

She said extended warranties were sometimes sold under names such as “extended care” or “product protection” and upsold to customers at the checkout.

“We have seen examples where they’re automatically added to the product’s sale, especially online, you’ll see them added to your basket at checkout and you’d have to untick it,” Rafferty said.

None of the stores where Choice bought the products responded to a request for comment.

A spokesperson for the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said in a statement it had engaged with Choice as part of its investigation.

“The ACCC is concerned that the current consumer guarantees framework under the Australian Consumer Law does not provide sufficient incentives for businesses to comply with their statutory obligations.”

The spokesperson said the ACCC continued to advocate for law reform to compel retailers to meet consumer guarantee obligations and to make it illegal for manufacturers not to reimburse consumers when a fault in a product was the responsibility of the manufacturer.


Natasha May

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Australian banks should reimburse scam victims, ACCC and consumer advocates say
‘Glaring lack of regulations’ means Australia is a ‘wild, wild west’, Consumer Action Law Centre policy officer says

Cait Kelly

01, Feb, 2023 @2:00 PM

Article image
Sydney renter hit by 35% hike as housing crisis sparks calls to cap increases
Tenants’ Union says some form of rent control is needed to alleviate pressure during a ‘nasty’ time in the market

Mostafa Rachwani

03, Feb, 2023 @9:06 PM

Article image
Australia’s corporate watchdog joins calls for stricter regulation of buy now, pay later products
Asic raises concerns about missed payment fees and people giving up essentials to afford repayments

Jordyn Beazley

16, Feb, 2023 @2:00 PM

Article image
Australia should force banks to repay scam victims and adopt better protections, advocates say
Calls for federal government to mandate the checking of account details before money transfers are made

Cait Kelly

12, Feb, 2023 @2:00 PM

Article image
Will Labor’s super changes force people to sell assets to pay their tax? Here’s what the experts say
Fears that asset rich but cash poor Australians will be hurt by the new regime are overblown, economists argue

Jonathan Barrett Senior business reporter

03, Mar, 2023 @2:00 PM

Article image
Australian warranties acting to ‘discourage’ repairs or replacements under consumer law
Choice says consumers are wrongly assuming out-of-warranty product failures cannot be addressed

Josh Taylor

19, Jul, 2021 @11:21 PM

Article image
'Just another type of debt': Australia's struggle to regulate buy now, pay later firms
The sector has exploded and debt is soaring. While Asic lacks the power to follow the UK on regulatory action, consumer groups want it subjected to the same laws as other credit

Ben Butler and Nino Bucci

25, Feb, 2021 @4:30 PM

Article image
Australian debt management firm accused of threatening clients with prison for ‘pointless purchases’
Asic is taking federal court action against Debt Negotiators, alleging the company harassed and coerced customers

Ben Butler

17, Nov, 2021 @5:22 AM

Article image
Woolworths expands self-checkout AI that critics say treats ‘every customer as a suspect’
Supermarket says cameras used to detect accidental wrong scans while experts say the technology is ‘punitive’ and call for reforms to protect privacy

Josh Taylor

18, Feb, 2023 @7:00 PM

Article image
NAB to introduce buy now, pay later product placing further pressure on existing operators
Standalone operators feel burden of rising interest rates and slowing growth as third big Australian bank enters BNPL scene

Ben Butler

26, May, 2022 @5:32 AM