Colin Norris: serial killer nurse conviction sent to court of appeal

New evidence calls into doubt 2008 case of man known as ‘angel of death’ for four murders in Leeds

New evidence could lead to the freeing of a nurse known as the “angel of death” who was convicted of killing four patients.

Key parts of the prosecution case that led to the conviction of Colin Norris in 2008 for the murders and for the attempted murder of a fifth patient have been brought into question by the expert evidence.

Norris, 45, has served more than a decade in prison, having been sentenced to spend a minimum of 30 years behind bars.

The official body that examines alleged miscarriages of justice on Friday announced it had sent Norris’s case back to the court of appeal. It has concluded there is a possibility the court will quash all of Norris’s convictions.

Norris was found guilty in 2008 by a majority verdict, meaning at least one juror was not convinced. The trial in Newcastle upon Tyne lasted five months and relied heavily on controversial expert evidence.

He was found to have injected insulin into his five alleged victims, who were all inpatients on orthopaedic wards in Leeds. Four died from hypoglycaemia, where blood sugar drops dangerously low, while the fifth survived.

There was no direct evidence against Norris, only circumstantial evidence. The prosecution said hypoglycaemia was “vanishingly” rare and it produced experts to testify to that effect. The Guardian understands that conclusion has been undermined by the new evidence.

Norris’s attempts to clear his name have so far been rebuffed. His case was investigated by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which decided it may be unsafe.

The commission said: “The prosecution said that spontaneous hypoglycaemia was extremely rare, and it was extraordinary to have a cluster of cases in one place in such a short space of time. They alleged that Mr Norris was present when or shortly before each of the patients became hypoglycaemic, and that his presence was the only factor common to all five cases.”

It added: “The experts agree that the hypoglycaemia in … four patients … may be accounted for by natural causes. The new expert evidence has also highlighted several other relevant developments in the understanding of hypoglycaemia, including its prevalence in the elderly and frail, which cast further doubt on the expert opinion relied upon by the prosecution at trial. This new expert evidence explored recent developments in a complex area where scientific understanding is still developing.”

Norris was convicted of murdering Doris Ludlam, 80, Bridget Bourke, 88, Irene Crookes, 79, and 86-year-old Ethel Hall.

Prosecutors alleged Norris disliked elderly patients and thus deliberately injected the women with insulin. The case was reminiscent of that of the serial killer Dr Harold Shipman and was investigated by the same police force, West Yorkshire, with some of the same detectives involved.

Norris’s mother, June Morrison, welcomed the fresh hope for her son. “At long last we have a glimmer of hope that the nightmare which has taken over all our lives since my innocent son was first interviewed by police in 2002 may be coming to an end,” she said. “I hope and pray that justice will finally prevail.”

Paul May, from a group trying to clear Norris’s name, said: “Colin’s case highlights the difficulties juries face when considering scientific and medical evidence. Today’s certainty may turn out to be tomorrow’s fallacy. Providing the court of appeal takes an objective view of Colin’s case as it now stands, we’re confident he’ll soon be freed and exonerated.”

The CCRC refers 3% of the 1,400 cases it examines each year back to the court of appeal. There, senior judges can uphold a conviction or quash it, leading to either the defendant going free or facing a new trial.

Contributor

Vikram Dodd Police and crime correspondent

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
'Angel of Death' Colin Norris could be cleared of insulin murders
Evidence nurse did not poison elderly Leeds hospital patients to be passed to Criminal Cases Review Commission

Duncan Campbell

03, Oct, 2011 @11:03 PM

Article image
Laura Mitchell loses appeal against Andrew Ayres murder conviction
Court of appeal’s judgment criticised by campaigners seeking changes to ‘joint enterprise’ rules

Owen Bowcott Legal affairs correspondent

14, Nov, 2018 @5:58 PM

Article image
Sam Hallam murder case sent back to court of appeal
Court to re-examine alleged miscarriage of justice and life jail term over 2004 London killing

Duncan Campbell

03, Aug, 2011 @12:26 PM

Article image
Sam Hallam to appeal against murder conviction
Young man jailed as a teenager over death of trainee chef in London to challenge guilty verdict after new evidence emerges

Sandra Laville, crime correspondent

16, May, 2012 @7:54 AM

Article image
Last Oval Four man has 1972 conviction referred to court of appeal
Constantine Boucher set to be cleared after mugging convictions of other three quashed

Duncan Campbell and agency

13, Jan, 2020 @4:49 PM

Article image
Special court orders cast doubt on Kevin Lane murder conviction
Kevin Lane has spent more than 18 years in prison, but has vowed to clear his name before being released

Jamie Doward

20, Jul, 2013 @11:04 PM

Article image
John Heibner's appeal fails, but 40-year fight against murder conviction goes on
Armed robber insists he is innocent of shooting in murder case seen as one of Britain's longest running miscarriages of justice

Duncan Campbell

07, Feb, 2014 @3:14 PM

Article image
Vulnerable man ‘humiliated’ into confessing to 1990 London murder, court told
Court hears Oliver Campbell, now 53, was convicted on basis of inconsistent confession made under police pressure

Emily Dugan

28, Feb, 2024 @7:12 PM

Article image
Simon Hall murder conviction goes to court of appeal
Criminal Cases Review Commission refers case of Simon Hall, convicted in 2003 of murder of mother's friend Joan Albert

Sam Jones and Natalie Hanman

14, Oct, 2009 @5:48 PM

Article image
Case of Profumo affair's 'pimp' will not go to court of appeal
Stephen Ward’s 1963 conviction will not be reviewed because original transcript of judge’s summing up cannot be found

Ruth Quinn

08, Sep, 2017 @11:37 PM